09/04/2022
I understand why some people think this. But it’s just not that simple.
INSULT NO.5 of our month long insult series is:
"Trust me, they would eat if they were hungry"
This is and can be actually quite damaging for our restrictive eaters. There are many reasons why a child can't (notice I said "can't" not "won't" here) and those reasons are usually unknown to the parent/carer and takes a whole lot of detective work to figure out why. It could be sensory related, an aversion to the taste, smell, feel, look and appearance of some food. It could be they rely on familiarity. A certain look, or brand of chicken nuggets or a specific drink.
I think of GrumpyDad and his situation here where his kid will only drink a certain brand of juice which is being discontinued and where they are struggling to find supply of this juice. Ben would and has stopped drinking for certain periods due to his restrictive intake of this juice. Ben has also previously been hospitalised and this statement can have a really dangerous outcome for those who take this advice as fact and who do not know any better.
Before we comment or advise on particular topics, differences, situations, we must stop and think about the repercussions that our advice may have on a particular child/adult with a different neurology.
⭕️It really isn't always this simple. Don't make this judgment until you know ALL the facts!