14/12/2023
IDF execution-style massacre of women, children and babies seeking refuge in a school in Gaza. Shot point blank with side-arms, not killed by bombing or shelling.
I honestly don't know how anyone can justify this to themselves. I know the official government/ media Axis justifications that are deployed: "Israel has a right to defend herself." "Hamas have embedded themselves within the civilian population, some collateral civilian damage is acceptable". And the good old. "Well, they had it coming".
I'll deal with those one by one:
"Israel has a right to defend herself." Yes, and the Israeli government was warned thirty-six hours upfront of an impending terror-attack by Hamas, coming out of Gaza. By, of all people, the Egyptian government. The Israeli government chose to ignore the warning and chose not to redeploy troops to defend those settlements immediately adjacent to Gaza. That would have been self-defence, but they chose to let it happen and then go down a path of massive retaliation against a civilian population instead. Something expressly forbidden by international law, namely Article 33 of the Geneva Convention of 1949.
"Hamas have embedded themselves within the civilian population, some collateral civilian damage is acceptable". Yes, well that was the strategic thinking behind the My Lai massacre too. It was believed that the VC 48th Local Force Battalion had taken refuge in the Son My area, and embedded themselves among the local civilian population. By the time the acceptability of civilian collateral damage had filtered it's way down the US chain of command, it'd translated into "anyone who runs is a VC". Including women and children. We all know how that turned out.
"Well, they had it coming". Really? Premature babies dead in incubators in bombed-out hospitals? I can't imagine the human conscience that can adjust itself to that. And anyone who believes that the history of the region starts on Oct 7th 2023 is demonstrating a profound ignorance of history. Frankly, if that justification is to be accepted, then the British would have been quite justified in carpet-bombing Jewish settlers in 1946 after the bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem in 1946 by Irgun.
..and yes, Britain did indeed firebomb Dresden and Hamburg during WW2, but that was after we'd taken 143,000 civilian casualties in the seven month period known as the Blitz. The response was proportionate, and it was warfare: when our bombers went over, they were facing an enemy equipped with squadrons of day and night fighters, numerous anti-aircraft batteries, radar and all the co-ordinated responses of a fully-equipped enemy in the field....and the RAF suffered huge casualties in consequence. That was warfare. When you bomb a completely defenceless civilian population, with no air force, no anti-aircraft defences etc....that's not a war you're conducting. It's genocide. For which there can never be any moral justification.
I could write reams more on this topic, I've barely skimmed the surface. I'm looking at it from the point of view of a historian, however amateur I may be, and thinking of how these historical chains of cause and effect usually play out. And let me tell you, there are always survivors of genocides, and the ethnic cleansing of any region is always a bloody, dirty business, and casts a very long, very turbulent shadow across that region and her peoples, sometimes for centuries.
Now we have evidence that it might not stop at Gaza. The Israeli Ambassador in Paris gave a speech the other day, where he appeared alongside a map of "Greater Israel", that marked the kingdom of Jordan as Israeli territory. He also said that there are no such people as Palestinians, that they're a historical invention. Which I have to say is one of the most contemptuously racist conceits I've ever heard. I wish I could say that it's the first time I'd ever heard of an entire ethnicity and their very identity being slandered like that....but it's not.
I cannot believe the times through which I'm living. The world seems to have learned nothing.
Oh, hang on, I forgot the other one: "why don't the Palestinians just protest peacefully?" Well, they do. They've tried that on the anniversary of the Nakba, when they just go down to the fence of their prison-camp and stand in peaceful protest. The last two times, the IDF opened fire on them, on one occasion resulting in sixty casualties. including international journalists who were hit while standing quite separately from the protesters and identifiable by their hi-vis media vests. Peaceful protest is somewhat difficult to persist with when it's met by live rounds. And again, from a historical perspective, British troops opening fire on a peaceful march by the Irish Civil Rights Movement was what kicked off The Troubles in Northern Ireland. Opening fire on peaceful protesters is the best recruiting sergeant ever for violent paramilitary forces.