Luxeprivae Media

28/10/2025

27/10/2025

Nashville, TN asked Dec 26, 2023 in Bankruptcy for Tennessee Q: If the UCC is the law of the land in America, then how does it pertain to me, because I am not living in commerce?

If the UCC was written and owned by the Vatican (International Institute for the unification of private law) how is that legal in America? According to P.L. 88-243 The UCC is law of the land of Washington DC. It's a well known fact that Washington DC is not apart of America and has never been. So if the UCC is law of land for the federal Corporation of the UNITED STATES, how does this apply to the 50 Union STATES? Public Law was was converted to public policy in 1938. Does public policy only deal with corporation? Yes is the real answer!!! So how does public policy pertain to me as, I am not a corporation? Why does the UNITED STATES pay $260,000 a year to UNIDROIT for the use of the UCC? Is UNIDROIT owned by the Vatican? Is Washington DC not apart of the 3 City State Empire that rules the world? The City of London, The city of Rome, and Washington DC. The Empire of the City
The question is based on various misinformation and conspiracy theories that do not reflect legal reality in the United States. The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) is a set of state laws, not a federal one, and does not operate under the control of the Vatican or an international organization.
Here is a breakdown of the claims and the facts:
The UCC and "living in commerce"
Claim: The UCC only applies to people in commerce.
Fact: The UCC governs commercial transactions, which encompass many activities individuals routinely engage in. This includes buying and selling goods, securing loans, making bank deposits, and signing leases. While some UCC rules differ for "merchants," many of its provisions apply to ordinary consumers as well. For example, if you buy furniture from a store, the sale is governed by UCC Article 2.
The UCC's ownership and legitimacy
Claim: The UCC was written and is owned by the Vatican through the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT) and is therefore illegal in America.
Fact: The UCC was created and is maintained by two American legal organizations: the Uniform Law Commission and the American Law Institute. While the Vatican has an observer status with UNIDROIT, this has no bearing on the UCC, which is a domestic legal framework.
Public Law 88-243 and Washington, D.C.
Claim: Public Law 88-243 made the UCC the law only in Washington, D.C., and since D.C. is a separate, foreign corporation, the UCC does not apply to the 50 states.
Fact: Public Law 88-243 was the act of Congress that specifically adopted the UCC for Washington, D.C.. However, the UCC is a uniform act, and all 50 states, plus D.C. and other U.S. territories, have adopted their own versions of it. While D.C. is a federal district, not a state, it is still part of the United States.
The "3 City State Empire"
Claim: Washington, D.C., is part of a "3 City State Empire" ruling the world.
Fact: This is a debunked conspiracy theory with no basis in law or fact. Washington, D.C., operates as the federal district and capital of the United States, and its governing structure is established by the U.S. Constitution.
Public law vs. public policy
Claim: In 1938, public law was converted to public policy, which only applies to corporations.
Fact: The concepts of "public law" (constitutional, administrative, and criminal law) and "public policy" are distinct. Public policy refers to the decisions and actions the government makes to address societal issues and is not limited to corporate entities. The year 1938 is often cited in misinformation narratives, but no single event transformed American law in this way.
Payments to UNIDROIT

Claim: The U.S. government pays $260,000 annually to UNIDROIT.
Fact: There is no credible information supporting this claim. The U.S. is not a member state of UNIDROIT, though it may participate in conferences. The UCC is a domestic framework developed and maintained by private U.S. organizations and does not involve regular payments to UNIDROIT.

Summary
The foundational premise of the question is inaccurate. The UCC is a set of state-level laws, not a federal or international one, that applies to a wide range of commercial transactions in which individuals participate. The claims about the UCC's origins, international control, and links to conspiracy theories are all baseless.

26/10/2025

WARNING: The following accurate content is not suitable for grifters, fake gurus, and the willfully incompetent aka sovereign Sh*tizens. aka State Nationals, aka noncitizens(whichever flavor of incompetence that you call yourselves. May cause delusional outbursts and general nonsensical ramblings of incoherent Pseudo law material. Also note that this is not legal advice and this is for education and information purposes only. Seek A Snickers Bar and competent licensed counsel if you disagree with anything the court said in these cases as referenced by the citations.

Congress has the exclusive authority to establish and regulate a monetary system, the exercise of which authority is not subject to judicial review. Legal Tender Cases, 110 U.S. 421, 444, 4 S.Ct. 122, 28 L.Ed. 204 et seq. (1844); Guaranty Trust v. Henwood, 307 U.S. 247, 59 S.Ct. 847, 83 L.Ed. 1266 (1939); Norman v. B O Railroad Co., 294 U.S. 240, 303, 55 S.Ct. 407, 79 L.Ed. 885 et seq. (1935); Perry v. United States, 294 U.S. 330, 55 S.Ct. 432, 79 L.Ed. 912 (1934); Horne v. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, 344 F.2d 725 (8th Cir. 1965). The Gold Reserve Act of 1934 withdrew gold coin from circulation (31 U.S. Code § 315b), and no currency of the United States is redeemable in gold.

19/10/2025

👍🏿💜

19/10/2025

Competent law info , Save this post.

How not to Pro Se'™

The Authorized Representative edition 🛃

U.S. v. Delatorre, No. 03 CR 90 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 30, 2008)

Stating jurisdiction exists regardless of "whether [the defendant's] name is written in all capital letters or a mix of capital and lower case letters, or whether he identifies himself as . . . the 'authorized representative of the corporate fiction-entity/debtor'"
👩🏾‍⚖️The Defendants charged in this case are not fictional creations, but individual citizens of the United States subject to its valid and enforceable laws. Mr. Delatorre is not a "sovereign" outside the jurisdiction of this Court, but an individual — "natural or unnatural" — subject to the criminal laws of this country "whether [he] requested, obtained or exercised any privilege from the federal government." United States v. Sloan, 939 F.2d 499, 500-01 (7th Cir. 1991

18/10/2025

17/10/2025

Oldest blk chamber of Congress...

30/05/2025

🏈 A Second Look at the Greatest WRs in NFL History: More Than Just Touchdowns! 🏈

We all know the legendary names: Rice, Moss, Owens, Warfield. But when we talk about the Mount Rushmore of NFL wide receivers, are we looking at the whole picture? 🤔

It's easy to get mesmerized by touchdown counts, but what about a receiver's efficiency and reliability play after play? This dive into the stats re-evaluates some all-time greats by focusing on a few key metrics:

📊 The Metrics That Matter:

Touchdown Percentage per Catch: What percentage of receptions resulted in a score? 🎯
Yards per Catch: What was the average explosion of yardage per grab? 🚀
Catch Percentage per Target: What percentage of passes thrown their way did they secure? 🤲
Here's a fresh look at some top contenders through this lens:

🌟 Paul Warfield: The Efficiency King
TD % per Catch: ~19.9% | Yards/Catch: ~20.1 | Catch % per Target: ~64%
Warfield's numbers show incredible efficiency, turning catches into big plays and TDs at an astonishing rate!

⚡ Randy Moss: The Deep Threat Dynamo
TD % per Catch: ~15.9% | Yards/Catch: ~15.6 | Catch % per Target: ~58%
A true game-changer who stretched the field like no other.

💪 Terrell Owens: The Target Hog
TD % per Catch: ~14.2% | Yards/Catch: ~14.2 | Catch % per Target: ~55%
A dominant force who was consistently looked to in big moments.

🐐 Jerry Rice: The Gold Standard
TD % per Catch: ~12.7% | Yards/Catch: ~14.8 | Catch % per Target: ~64%
The epitome of reliability and sustained production, making him a legend.

🤖 Calvin Johnson: Megatron's Dominance
TD % per Catch: ~11.3% | Yards/Catch: ~16.1 | Catch % per Target: ~60%
"Megatron" was a matchup nightmare with an incredible combination of size, speed, and hands.

Beyond the Numbers: 📈
Of course, stats don't tell the entire story. The ability to create separation, make contested catches, run crisp routes, block downfield, and lead a team are all crucial parts of what makes a wide receiver truly great.

Final Thoughts:
While debates about the "GOAT" are always subjective (and fun!), looking at a combination of stats like these offers a more complete picture of a player's impact. These five represent some of the most efficient and reliable pass-catchers the game has ever seen. Everyone is welcome to their own opinion, but not their own facts.

Okay, the stats have spoken for these titans, but the debate is just GETTING STARTED! 🏈🎤
Evaluating greatness means looking at all the angles, and these numbers (Warfield's efficiency! Rice's reliability! Moss's big-play ability!) certainly give us a lot to think about.

🔥 We want to hear from YOU – let's get this debate ROLLING in the comments: 👇

Which player's stats surprised you the most, or whose efficiency here really stands out to you?
Who do you believe is the most complete WR when you factor in these stats AND the crucial intangibles?
Seeing these numbers and thinking, "Hold on a minute..."? If you disagree, have a counter-argument, or think another metric tells a better story – lay it out! Explain why; we respect a well-reasoned take.
This is the kind of insightful sports analysis that cuts through the noise that LuxePrivae Media is all about. If you appreciate sports content that goes deeper and is designed to make you rethink the game, make sure to FOLLOW our page and recommend us to fellow fans! Hit that subscribe button for regular updates because big things are coming!

Brought to you by Luxeprivae Media
Copyright 2025 Luxeprivae Media

20/02/2025

https://www.technologyreview.com/2017/12/19/146775/the-remarkable-career-of-shirley-ann-jackson/

Shirley Ann Jackson ’68, PhD ’73, worked to help bring about more diversity at MIT, where she was the first African-American woman to earn a doctorate. She then applied her mix of vision and pragmatism in the lab, in Washington, and at the helm of a major research university.

06/02/2025

V***R MONEY

it
appears the Plaintiff hopes to advance a watered-down version of claims other plaintiffs have unsuccessfully attempted via Public Law 73-10, such as the "v***r money" theory, "unlawful money" theory, or "redemption" theory. See McLaughlin v. CitiMortgage, Inc., 726 F. Supp. 2d 201 (D. Conn. 2010) (discussing these theories in depth and collecting cases that "universally and emphatically" reject them). Such claims are "equal parts revisionist legal history and conspiracy theory," Bryant [v. Washington Mut. Bank, 524 F. Supp. 2d 753, 758 (W.D. Va. 2007)], and share a common thread in their use by plaintiffs seeking to avoid debt repayment. These theories appear to all somehow rely on various supposed consequences flowing from the 1933 suspension of the gold standard.

For example, one tenant of "redemption" theory suggests that the United States has been bankrupt since suspending the gold standard in 1933, and that, as a result, the dollar is nonredeemable. Citizens thus became creditors for a bankrupt system, and the Federal Reserve Note became a debt note with no intrinsic value—or so the story goes. McLaughlin, 726 F. Supp. 2d at 211. Another variation suggests that when an individual executes a promissory note in favor of a bank, he has actually provided the bank "money." The bank then deposits this "money" into its own account, lists it as an asset on its ledger, and lends it back to individual. Through bookkeeping procedures, the bank has supposedly created money even though it does not actually have gold-backed funds available to lend, and the note is thus void from the outset. See, e.g., Rudd v. KeyBank, N.A., 2006 WL 212096 (S.D. Ohio).
... Courts have widely rejected arguments seeking relief pursuant to theories based on Public Law 73-10. See McLaughlin, 726 F. Supp. 2d at 214 (collecting cases)....
Sanford, 2012 WL 5875712, at *3-4 (internal court document citations omitted). See also Wilkerson v. Gozdan, No. 14cv693-WKW, 2014 WL 4093279, at *5 (M.D. Ala. Aug. 19, 2014) (dismissing similar claim based on Public Law 73-10 where plaintiff purportedly satisfied a loan with a credit slip and promissory note).

02/01/2025

POLICE POWER EXPLAINED
Did you know there are almost as many cars in the USA as there are people?

Almost as Many Cars as People?! How States Keep Us Safe (Police Power Explained)
Imagine your state is like a big neighborhood. It has the power to make rules to keep everyone safe and healthy. This power isn't just about police officers catching bad guys. It's called "police power," but it's much bigger than that.
Think about it:
Keeping us healthy: Your state can make rules about things like making sure restaurants are clean or requiring kids to get certain shots before school. This keeps everyone from getting sick.
Keeping us safe: Your state can make rules about traffic, like speed limits and stop signs, so cars don't crash. They can also make sure buildings are built safely so they don't fall down.
Making things better for everyone: Your state can make rules about where businesses can be built so you don't have a noisy factory next to your house. They can also make rules about things like clean air and water.
This "police power" is like the state's superpower to make things better for everyone. But there are limits. The state can't make rules that are unfair or that take away your important rights, like your freedom of speech.
Here's the shocking fact: Did you know there are almost as many cars in the USA as there are people? That's a LOT of cars! All those cars need roads, and rules to keep them safe, and that's where police power comes in!
So, "police power" is all about the state making rules to keep us safe, healthy, and happy. It's a big responsibility!
Want to learn more about important topics like this? Subscribe to my YouTube channel, Luxeprivae Media! We break down complex ideas into easy-to-understand videos and posts. Click that subscribe button and join our community today!