23/04/2022
From:Elmo RIVADENERIA 4/21/2022 THE NEW JERSEY CRIMINAL PROSECUTION SYSTEM. THE PROSECUTION OVERLY FOCUSED ON ELMO RIVADENERIA AS THE ATTACKER, DISREGARDING AND WITHHOLDING CRITICAL EVIDENCE LEADING TO ELMO RIVADENERIA CONVICTION. PROSECUTOR’S ARE NOT ARCHITECT’S OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICES SYSTEM AND MUST ABIDE BY THE LAWS WHICH HAVE BEEN PUT IN PLACE TO ENSURE THE RIGHT PERSON IS IMPRISONED. PROSECUTORS CAN NOT HIDE OR DISTORT EVIDENCE TO FIT THERE CASE. BUT MUST OBEY THE LAW AND DISCLOSE ALL CRITICAL EVIDENCE TO THE ACCUSED AND HIS ATTORNEY SO THE JURY GETS TO HEAR ALL THE FACTS,AND NOT JUST THE PROSECUTOR’S CHERRY PICKED FACTS,WHICH SUPPORT THEIR ASSUMED VERSION OF WHO IS GUILTY. SUCH PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT WILL NEVER LEAD TO A JUST RESULT. IT IS FOR THIS REASON THAT ELMO RIVADENERIA NOW PETITIONS THE FEDERAL AND THE STATE COURTS TO OVERTURN HIS CONVICTION BECAUSE HIS CONVICTION WAS THE RESULT OF WITHHELD AND DISTORTED EVIDENCE BY AN OVERZEALOUS PROSECUTOR THAT WENT OUTSIDE THE AMBIT OF THE LAW, WITHHOLDING EVIDENCE FROM THE JURY,IN ORDER TO SEND ELMO RIVADENERIA TO PRISON. PROSECUTOR’S RARELY, IF EVER, GET PUNISHED FOR SUCH PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT. SO, IF YOU ARE ASKING YOUR SELF WHY WOULD A PROSECUTOR DISTORT AND WITHHOLD evidence. THE ANSWER IS SIMPLE, BECAUSE they can,and do, with no consequences FOR DOING SO. NOT ONE PROSECUTOR WHO INTENTIONALLY SENT AN INNOCENT MAN TO PRISON HAS EVER BEEN PROSECUTED AND SENT TO PRISON. PROSECUTOR’S ARE HUMAN WITH AMBITIONS TO BE SUCCESSFUL. BUT NOT ALL HAVE THE SKILL TO DO SO FOLLOWING THE RULES THEY SWORE TO UPHOLD. A PRIME EXAMPLE OF A PROSECUTOR’S SELF AMBITIONS,CAN BE FOUND WITH THE SAME PROSECUTOR THAT PROSECUTED ELMO RIVADENERIA, HUDSON COUNTY ASSISTANT PROSECUTOR JOHN MULKEEN. PROSECUTOR MULKEEN WAS ASSIGNED TO PROSECUTE ALBERT J. ALVAREZ, AN OFFICIAL OF THE NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR OFFICE. FOR THE R**E OF A FEMALE CAMPAIGN OFFICE. KATIE BRENNAN. THE FEMALE CAMPAIGN OFFICIAL SWORE THAT THE MALE OFFICIAL R**ED HER IN HER HOME AFTER HE GAVE HER A RIDE HOME AND ASKED TO USE HER BATHROOM. PROSECUTOR MULKEEN CHOSE NOT TO CRIMINALLY PROSECUTE THE MALE OFFICIAL BECAUSE HE CLAIMED THAT THE R**E VICTIM’S STATEMENT ALONE DID NOT SUBSTANTIATE HER CLAIM OF RAP. HOW RIDICULOUS IS THAT. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY LATER PAID KATIE BRENNAN A LARGE SUM OF HUSH MONEY TO SETTLE THE MATTER OUT SIDE OF THE COURT. SO YOU MUST ASK YOURSELF, WAS THIS NOT SELF MOTIVATED ON THE PROSECUTOR MULKEEN’S PART. NOT TO TARNISH GOVERNOR MURPHY’S CAMPAIGN AND ULTIMATE ELECTION WITH AN INDICTMENT AND TRIAL FOR R**E OF A FEMALE OFFICIAL DURING HIS CAMPAIGN, IN WHICH, COMPLAINTS MY THE VICTIM WENT IGNORED BY THE GOVERNOR AND HIS STAFF. HOWEVER PROSECUTOR MULKEEN, HAD NO PROBLEM DISTORTING and withholding critical evidence, AND THEN DRAGGING, ELMO RIVADENERIA AND HIS FAMILY THROUGH A TRIAL WITH NO TRUE EVIDENCE OF GULT. A MIXTURE OF SKIN CELLS FROM 3 or 4 people, THAT WAS FOUND ON THE GROUND, AND NO IDENTIFICATION THAT ELMO WAS THE ATTACKER. HUDSON COUNTY ASSISTANT PROSECUTOR JOHN MULKEEN A PROSECUTOR WHO DOES WHAT HE WANTS,NOT WHAT THE LAW REQUIRES HIM TO DO.
A judge is debating whether the case against two Jersey City men should be dismissed because of the prosecutors' error.
