data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9f70/d9f7094d08e15d6500a435fb9f2f01d9465ad25d" alt="Addendum:Creating knowledge and its branching utilities when something novel emerges. From lightbulbs to CRT screens (wh..."
29/01/2025
Addendum:
Creating knowledge and its branching utilities when something novel emerges. From lightbulbs to CRT screens (when we once feared we’d run out of glass) to today’s LCDs; from diesel engines (amid concerns about depleting diesel supplies) to electric vehicles, the creation of knowledge, along with its error-correction processes, consistently leads to new fractals of efficiency. These advancements = new opportunities and works centered around that progress.
When I said "alarming," I was referring to the tremendous acceleration of technological advancements. I didn’t explicitly label it as good or bad, just alarming.
By making our surroundings smarter, we might unintentionally be making ourselves replaceable. Each leap forward in technology comes at the cost of losing certain skills and forms of knowledge that have been built over millennia.
We might be letting ourselves be outgrown by something far greater than we can grow.
I don’t think most people realize the alarming rate of acceleration and the growing gap between individuals or corporations well-positioned in technology and those outside the tech business—except, perhaps, for those whose businesses deal with basic human needs like food, shelter, and so on.
Maybe next year (or months), a person could input an application idea into their computer, and it could generate a fully functional program. Just two years ago, this might have taken a programmer a month or more, depending on the complexity of the application. This means there is an alarming disparity between individuals who have already established a certain level of licensure, certification, competence, or a portfolio before the rise of advanced LLM models, proof of their ability to be trusted, liable, and responsible for certain work vs those who haven’t.
We could soon see an alarming decline in jobs, leaving millions unemployed. Corporations and individuals who are already well-positioned themselves will continue to accumulate leverage and wealth. The more advanced technology makes the more their operations more efficient and cost-effective. It's obvious why wouldn’t replace human workers with technology that can do the work faster and cheaper?
While the idea of technology so advanced that it can think and execute tasks at incredible speeds is exciting, the reality is much harsher for those whose livelihoods depend on jobs that could be replaced by intelligent machines. Imagine millions of individuals rendered obsolete in a single day, with no work left.
What would that world look like?
And if you were one of those individuals, because, at the rate at which technology is improving now, the odds aren’t in anyone’s favor without intervention, especially without clear regulations determining who stays employed and who doesn’t
How would you feel?
Alarming.
_Rai