Where Free Speech Meets Big Tech (Part 2) with David Hancharik
In this week’s episode of More Than Politics (the second of a two-part conversation) I talk with David Hancharik, an electrical engineer who has worked in the telecommunications industry for over 36 years. David and I discuss the controversy regarding free speech and “Big Tech” – the technology companies that make our internet and social media usage possible.
In the wake of the January 6th attack on the U.S. Capitol, social media companies suspended accounts (President Trump’s most notable among them) and hosting companies took websites offline. To many, these actions felt like attacks on Americans’ freedom of speech.
But were they? It’s not such a simple question. Do private companies infringe on individuals’ freedom of speech when they don’t permit them to use the companies’ platforms? In a world where most political speech has moved online, have those platforms come to be our newest, and most important, public square? And which is more important: companies’ rights to their private property or individuals’ rights to use that property for public speech?
David and I spoke at such length on these questions (and more) that we split the conversation into two episodes. This episode covers: the Fairness Doctrine; the differences between bias, accuracy, and fairness; the question of whether office-holders should always be allowed access to social media platforms; how social media companies cooperate with the government when it comes to threats to public officials; the unintended consequences that might result from efforts to restrict social media companies’ ability to censor content on their sites; and the importance of considering matters of conscience when it comes to those who work in “Big Tech.”
I hope you'll come listen.
https://morethanpolitics.buzzsprout.com/1210460/8079887
Where Free Speech Meets Big Tech (Part 1)
Free speech. "Big Tech." They sure are hot-button topics these days, aren't they? So how about we explore them? How about we talk them through, engage in a little #calmconversation so as to try to understand this big, important debate and come to some well-informed opinions?
In this week’s episode of More Than Politics I talk with David Hancharik, an electrical engineer who has worked in the telecommunications industry for over 36 years. David and I discuss the controversy regarding free speech and “Big Tech” – the technology companies that make our internet and social media usage possible.
In the wake of the January 6th attack on the U.S. Capitol, social media companies suspended accounts (President Trump’s most notable among them) and hosting companies took websites offline. To many, these actions felt like attacks on Americans’ freedom of speech.
But were they? It’s not such a simple question. Do private companies infringe on individuals’ freedom of speech when they don’t permit them to use the companies’ platforms? In a world where most political speech has moved online, have those platforms come to be our newest, and most important, public square? And which is more important: companies’ rights to their private property or individuals’ rights to use that property for public speech?
David and I spoke at such length on these questions (and more) that we’re splitting the conversation into two episodes. This first episode covers: the often-discussed (but perhaps seldom understood) “Section 230” of the Communications Decency Act; how the right to free speech interacts with the right to private property; the concept of the public square; what “Big Tech” currently protects its users from; the enormity of the current moment; and the fact that “Big Tech” is made up of real, individual people, each with their own consciences.
I hope you'll come listen:
https://morethanpolitics.buzzsprout.com/1210460/8034321