Ashley County Now (2025)

19/06/2025

Norwood and the Portis Voice: Ashley County’s Own Deadpan Genius
Part 5: Oddballs and Ordinary Folks

Nobody writes about oddballs quite like Charles Portis. In Norwood, the road trip is packed with unforgettable characters—a fortune-telling chicken, a would-be country singer, a circus performer, schemers, drifters, and talkers of every kind. These people aren’t just comic relief; they’re the heart and soul of Portis’s world.

What makes Portis different is that he never mocks his characters from above. Even the quirkiest figures are treated with a kind of gentle affection and respect. Their dreams, schemes, and everyday struggles matter, even when they’re funny. To Portis, there’s real value in the lives of those the world might overlook. It’s a sensibility you’ll recognize from any small town in Arkansas: nobody’s too strange, too quiet, or too ambitious to deserve their own story.

Norwood celebrates the local and the ordinary, showing that the best stories aren’t always found in far-off places, but in the everyday encounters and unexpected friendships we make close to home. It’s a tribute to the idea that everyone—no matter how peculiar—belongs in the tapestry of life.

Sources:
Charles “Buddy” Portis: A Comprehensive Biography, compiled by K. Brad Barfield;
2001 Oral History Interview, University of Arkansas / Pryor Center.

19/06/2025

Breaking the Cycle: Education, Families, and Generational Change
Day 5 | June 19, 2025

If you want to predict how well a child will do in school, one of the strongest clues isn’t found in test scores—it’s found in the education level of their parents. Across South Arkansas, this truth shapes our communities in ways that are easy to see, but not always easy to solve.

The Family Link
A parent who struggles to read is less likely to read to their child. If a parent dreads math, helping with homework can feel overwhelming. The result? Kids can enter school already behind—and the cycle continues, generation after generation.

It’s not just about what happens at home, either. When a large share of adults in a county lack strong functional literacy or numeracy, schools, libraries, and even local businesses face greater challenges in building a thriving, educated workforce for the future.

Barriers—And Possibilities
Breaking this cycle is hard, but not impossible. The barriers are real:

Poverty makes it tougher to afford books, stable housing, or extra help for struggling students.

Parents working multiple jobs may not have the time or energy to be as involved as they’d like.

Many adults are embarrassed to seek help for their own skills.

But so are the possibilities:

Family literacy programs can help parents and children learn together.

Schools and community groups can create safe spaces for adult learning—no shame, just support.

Mentors, local literacy councils, and afterschool programs all make a difference.

Real Change Starts Close to Home
It doesn’t always take big government or national initiatives. Real change often begins with neighbors helping neighbors—churches offering reading groups, employers supporting worker training, and schools inviting parents to take part in their child’s education, no matter where they’re starting from.

Every time a parent builds their own skills, a child gets a better shot. Every time a community invests in learning, the next generation grows up with more opportunity.

Tomorrow: We’ll look at proven solutions—programs and approaches in South Arkansas that are already making a difference, and how we can support them.

Source Acknowledgment:
This essay series is based on Educational Attainment and Functional Capacity: An Assessment of Seven South Arkansas Counties, compiled by K. Brad Barfield. Data and analysis are drawn from the latest U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey, the PIAAC Skills Map, and additional resources included in the report.

19/06/2025

“Articles IV–VII: The Glue That Holds”

Not every part of the Constitution makes headlines.
Some sections do their work in the background—
quietly binding the nation, state by state, year by year.

Article IV speaks to the states:
Each one must respect the others’ laws and court decisions.
It guarantees every state a “republican form of government.”
Promises protection from invasion, and—if the need arises—help in times of unrest.

It also offers a roadmap for new states to join,
and a reminder that territory and change are part of the story.

Article V is the process for amending the Constitution—
not easy, not impossible.
A balance between tradition and adaptation.
It takes more than a whim to alter the framework, but not so much that it becomes stone.

Article VI puts the Constitution—and federal law—above all others.
No state law can overrule it.
It is the “supreme Law of the Land.”
Oaths are sworn to the Constitution, not to a leader or a party.
No religious test may be given for public office.
The law binds, but it is meant to bind equally.

Article VII is the final signature.
Ratification—nine states were enough to make it real.
A single moment where ink turned into order.

These are the parts that keep the country from coming apart at the seams.
The glue, the thread, the silent agreements behind the louder debates.

Who holds the power to bind or unbind?
When does a union become too fragile, or too rigid, to hold?

19/06/2025

Ashley County at 12PM – Day 5: 1927 – A Year of Change and Reckoning
June 19, 2025

1927: A Year of Change and Reckoning

In Ashley County, as in much of the South, the year 1927 was not just another chapter—it was a turning point. The Great Mississippi Flood, devastating as it was, marked the beginning of reconstruction in more ways than one. But it wasn’t only the flood that defined 1927 for Ashley County. It was also the bold innovations in forestry, the quiet revolution that was taking place behind the scenes, as the region learned to adapt, rebuild, and chart a new course.

It was a year when the land itself demanded change—not just in how people lived, but in how they thought about their relationship to it. The floodwaters reminded everyone of nature’s power, while the new approach to timber hinted at how the county could balance industrial growth with environmental sustainability.

The Great Flood of 1927: A Disaster that Reshaped the Landscape
In the spring of 1927, Ashley County was ravaged by one of the worst floods in American history. As the Mississippi River swelled and breached its levees, communities in the Delta, including parts of Ashley County, were submerged. It was a disaster that impacted not only the immediate areas but also the social and economic fabric of the entire county.

For the people in the eastern parts of the county, the flood was devastating. Crops were destroyed, livestock lost, and homes washed away. Families who had been living off the land were forced into refugee camps, and the government and Red Cross scrambled to provide aid. The flood tested the resilience of the people, but it also highlighted how little infrastructure existed to protect them from such a natural disaster.

In the wake of the flood, there was an undeniable sense that the county needed more than just recovery—it needed a new vision for its infrastructure, flood management, and future growth. The 1927 flood became a pivotal moment that pushed local leaders, state governments, and even the federal government to rethink the way they built cities, dams, levees, and roads.

A New Era in Forestry: Cap Gates and Sustainable Timber
While the floodwaters were still receding, another quiet revolution was underway in the western part of the county. Cap Gates, the visionary behind the Crossett Lumber Company, was spearheading what would later become a national model for sustainable forestry.

Before Gates’ leadership, most timber companies used a “cut-and-run” approach, where entire forests were harvested without regard for replanting or regeneration. But Gates, influenced by scientific forestry, saw a future where forests could be managed sustainably, ensuring a constant supply of timber for generations to come.

By 1927, the Crossett Lumber Company had begun employing Yale-trained foresters, mapping out harvest schedules and fire protection systems, and rotating timber harvests to prevent over-exploitation. This vision would later lead to the establishment of the Crossett Experimental Forest in 1933, a research site that would become a leading model for sustainable forest management throughout the country

The Intersection of Change: Floods, Forestry, and the Road Ahead
The flood of 1927 and the rise of sustainable forestry were both reminders of Ashley County’s vulnerability and its potential. On one hand, nature’s forces were beyond human control, pushing the community to adapt and rethink infrastructure. On the other hand, the forestry revolution was an example of how human ingenuity could help shape a more sustainable future—one that balanced industrial growth with ecological responsibility.

1927 was the year that Ashley County started to rebuild, not just physically but philosophically. The flood showed how fragile progress could be, but it also demonstrated the power of community resilience. The rise of sustainable forestry, meanwhile, revealed how industries could thrive without stripping the land bare.

As we look back on 1927, it becomes clear that the county was not simply reacting to crises—it was shaping its future. It was about balance: the flood, which could have wiped out the land’s potential, was met by a new way of thinking about the land’s potential as a renewable resource. What began as a disaster became a turning point in Ashley County’s history—just as we now stand on our own turning point, facing the challenges and opportunities of our time.

Did You Know?
The 1927 Mississippi Flood affected over 700,000 people across the region and was the worst flood in U.S. history to that point

Cap Gates’ sustainable forestry practices became a model for other timber companies across the country, leading to a more scientific approach to logging

After the flood, the federal government began investing heavily in flood control, leading to the construction of levees and dams across the Mississippi River and its tributaries

Short Social Blurb:

The floodwaters of 1927 reshaped the landscape of Ashley County, but it was the vision for sustainable forestry that showed us the way forward. Today’s 12PM essay looks back on a year of monumental change and its legacy.

Source Acknowledgment:
Sources for today’s feature include:

South Arkansas in the Late 1920s

Crossett, Arkansas: A Comprehensive History

An Architectural Analysis of Ashley County, Arkansas

19/06/2025

A Submerged Sanctuary: Felsenthal’s Ecosystem Under Siege

At the heart of the flood sits the Felsenthal National Wildlife Refuge—a place normally defined by its balance with water. Sprawling across more than 65,000 acres where the Ouachita and Saline Rivers meet, Felsenthal is a living mosaic of rivers, swamps, sloughs, and upland ridges. Here, the annual pulse of water isn’t just tolerated—it’s expected, and life is tuned to the rhythm of seasonal floods.

But the 2025 flood broke all the rules. Instead of winter’s carefully managed, dormant-season rise, a relentless surge of water arrived in late spring and summer—the exact period when bottomland hardwoods are leafing out, wildlife is raising young, and the entire system is at its most productive—and its most vulnerable.

A Crisis of Timing

Trees that usually survive (even thrive) under controlled winter flooding were now left standing in water during their growing season, risking lethal stress and dieback. Oaks and hickories—critical food producers for wildlife—faced drowning roots and leaf drop. The green understory that feeds everything from deer to black bears simply vanished beneath the murky surface.

For the animals, the effects were even more dramatic. Black bear cubs born in winter dens now faced evacuation with nowhere dry to go. White-tailed deer fawns, just weeks old, were stranded or swept away. Ground-nesting birds and small mammals lost broods and burrows. With food and shelter both wiped out, the ecosystem’s fabric began to unravel.

Wildlife on the Move

This is why so many displaced animals found themselves at the edge of Highway 82, desperate for high ground and food. Felsenthal, usually a sanctuary, became a submerged gauntlet—forcing bears, hogs, raccoons, and others out of their flooded world and into the dangerous, unfamiliar strip of roadside and embankment.

The same flood pulse that for centuries created one of the most diverse wild places in Arkansas now threatened to reset the balance, shifting both the landscape and its inhabitants in ways that will be felt long after the water finally recedes.

Sources
This essay is based on research and findings from High Water and High-Risk Crossings: An Ecological Analysis of Wildlife on Highway 82 During the Ouachita River Flood of 2025, compiled and curated by K. Brad Barfield. Additional archival material was curated from the Ovid T. Switzer, Jr. Collection, of which we have on loan.

19/06/2025

Ashley County at 11AM – Day 5: Flood, Oil & Innovation – The Tumultuous 1920s
June 19, 2025

Flood, Oil & Innovation: The Tumultuous 1920s

The 1920s in south Arkansas weren’t just “roaring”—they were wild, muddy, and sometimes near catastrophic. Ashley County stood at the crossroads: pine and oil, drought and deluge, the old South and the modern age. This was the decade when survival meant adapting fast—or getting washed away.

The Great Flood of 1927: A County Underwater

Nothing shaped the region like the Mississippi Flood of 1927. When the levees broke, water swallowed up Delta fields, washed away farms, and drove families from their homes. Across Ashley County, especially in the east, the impact was profound: livestock lost, roads gone, and communities cut off from each other. Refugee camps sprang up; the National Guard and the Red Cross set up relief stations. Local officials scrambled to distribute food, shelter, and hope—sometimes equitably, sometimes not

The flood’s scars lingered for years, reshaping not only the land but the region’s sense of vulnerability and need for better infrastructure.

Roads, Bridges, and the New Arkansas

Out of disaster came a push for progress. The late 1920s saw a revolution in infrastructure—thanks to a new state highway program (and some political wrangling from local heroes like Governor John E. Martineau and Ashley/Chicot’s own Harvey Parnell). For the first time, real highways began to cross the county:

U.S. Highway 82—connecting Hamburg, Crossett, and beyond—meant travel and trade no longer depended on the old meandering wagon roads.

New bridges (like the future Ouachita River crossing at Calion) started to link communities and bring rural Arkansas into the modern world.

The Ashley, Drew & Northern Railway was the lifeline for Crossett’s timber, hauling logs, lumber, and even passengers out to the national rail networks

These new connections helped tie together a county still divided by rivers and bayous, finally giving remote communities a fighting chance at economic survival.

Oil Across the Border: El Dorado’s Boom and Its Ripple Effect

While Ashley County’s wealth came from trees, just across the county line in Union County, a different kind of “gold” was gushing from the ground. The oil boom in El Dorado and Smackover turned those towns into instant boomtowns. The result?

New money flowed into the region.

Railroads and highways were improved to handle the flood of workers and equipment.

Ashley County watched closely—wondering if oil would strike here, too, and preparing for the changes (and chaos) that boomtowns bring

Timber’s New Frontier: Cap Gates and Sustainable Forestry

But the biggest innovation for Ashley County was happening in the pine forests. Under Edgar Woodward “Cap” Gates, the Crossett Lumber Company made a bold pivot:

Instead of just cutting until the trees were gone, they hired Yale-trained foresters (like Albert “Wack” Wackerman) and pioneered sustained-yield forestry.

They mapped the timber, left young trees standing, started fire patrols, and planned for harvest rotations that would keep the woods alive “twenty, thirty, forty years” into the future.

Gates told a national audience: “We have proved to our own satisfaction that a forest can be ‘farmed’ as practically as a cabbage patch or a corn field…it just takes longer and must be done on a large scale.”

This new ethic meant Crossett avoided the fate of most Southern mill towns—no “cut out and get out,” but a future built on “perpetual operation.” It was radical, and it worked.

A Community Rebuilds

Through flood and upheaval, innovation and struggle, the people of Ashley County rebuilt—sometimes because they had to, sometimes because they saw a chance to make it better. New roads, new ideas, and a new faith in the future turned disaster into opportunity.

Did You Know?

The Crossett Lumber Company’s approach to forestry in the late 1920s was so advanced that it became a national model—long before “sustainability” was a buzzword

Refugee camps in the county during the 1927 flood often revealed deep social and racial divides, with Black sharecroppers facing the brunt of hardship and discrimination

By 1927, Crossett was actively managing “second-growth pine,” turning what other mills saw as scrap into new profits and healthier forests

Short Social Blurb:

Floods, oil booms, and a radical new way to treat the forest—Ashley County’s 1920s was an era of upheaval and reinvention. Today’s 11AM is a story of disaster, innovation, and the stubborn hope that still drives us.

Source Acknowledgment:
Sources for today’s feature include:

South Arkansas in the Late 1920s

Crossett, Arkansas: A Comprehensive History

An Architectural Analysis of Ashley County, Arkansas

19/06/2025

Day 5: Injustice on Trial

The Elaine Twelve and the NAACP’s Fight

Published June 19, 2025, 10AM

The Arrests Begin
When the guns fell silent in Phillips County, the violence was far from over. Soldiers and local authorities swept through the countryside, arresting hundreds of Black men—sometimes entire families—on suspicion of “insurrection.” Homes were searched, people were pulled from fields and churches, and many were beaten, threatened, or worse. Martial law hung heavy in the air, and with it came a new wave of terror: the threat of legal retribution.

The targets of this campaign were not only those who had defended themselves, but union members, outspoken leaders, and anyone unlucky enough to be caught in the dragnet. Most would face harsh treatment in makeshift stockades, under armed guard, with little food, water, or protection from the elements.

Torture and Forced Confessions
Once in custody, the accused were subjected to brutal interrogations. Some were tortured with beatings, threats, and even electric shocks. The goal was simple: to extract confessions that would justify the violence and support the official narrative of a Black-led uprising. In reality, these confessions were forced, often dictated word-for-word by law enforcement, and signed under duress.

Dozens were indicted on charges ranging from murder to attempted insurrection. But the most infamous were the Elaine Twelve—a group of Black men accused of leading the supposed “rebellion.” Their cases were rushed to trial within weeks, the atmosphere inside the Phillips County courthouse charged with fear and hostility.

Kangaroo Courts
Justice was nowhere to be found. The trials of the Elaine Twelve were show trials in the truest sense: all-white juries, prosecutors and judges who were deeply connected to local power structures, and defense attorneys who did little to challenge the proceedings. Courtrooms were packed with angry white citizens, guns visible on their hips, and the accused men were offered no real opportunity to speak in their own defense.

Within minutes, verdicts were delivered: guilty. Twelve men were sentenced to death in the electric chair; others received long prison terms. It was, in every sense, an injustice rubber-stamped by fear and prejudice.

The NAACP Steps In
But the story did not end there. The sheer scale of the injustice drew national attention—especially from the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). Led by legendary attorney Scipio Africanus Jones, a former slave turned brilliant lawyer, the NAACP assembled a team to fight for the lives of the Elaine Twelve.

Scipio Jones and his colleagues risked their own safety to file appeals, challenge the forced confessions, and expose the sham nature of the trials. The battle for justice took years, working its way through the Arkansas courts and finally to the United States Supreme Court.

Moore v. Dempsey: Changing the Law
In 1923, in the landmark case Moore v. Dempsey, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Elaine defendants. For the first time, the highest court in the land recognized that mob-dominated trials violated the constitutional right to due process. The decision set a precedent that would echo for decades—helping protect the rights of the accused in courts across the United States.

Most of the Elaine Twelve eventually won their freedom, but the cost was enormous. Years spent behind bars. Families torn apart. Lives forever changed. Still, their case remains one of the most important legal victories for civil rights in American history.

A Bitter Aftermath
Justice, when it came, was too late for many. Some survivors left Arkansas forever, heading north as part of the Great Migration. For others, the trauma lingered—a reminder that the law, for too long, had been wielded as an instrument of oppression.

Tomorrow, we’ll explore the legacy of Elaine: the silence, the scars, and the long struggle to reckon with what happened in 1919.

Source Acknowledgment:
This essay is based on accounts from The Elaine Massacre of 1919 and chapters from Arkansas: A Narrative History (Second Edition) by Jeannie M. Whayne et al. We found these documents in The Ovid T. Switzer, Jr. Papers, of which we have on loan.

19/06/2025

🦚 Day 4: More Than Just a Pretty Face

Why the Peacock Stayed on Southern Soil

We’ve seen peafowl on plantations and loose in the suburbs. But in Day 4, we ask a simpler question:

Why did folks keep them?

It turns out, these birds didn’t stick around just because they were pretty. They stuck around because, in their own loud, strange, stubborn way — they were useful.

🚨 The Original Alarm System
You want a critter that’ll raise hell if someone’s creeping around at 2AM?

Get a peacock.

That wild, blood-curdling scream? It ain’t just for show. In the South — especially in the hills and hollers — peacocks were sometimes kept for one job:

Sound the alarm.

They’d squawk at bobcats

Holler at strangers

Even alert you when a snake slithered too close

Appalachian folks were known to say:

“They’ll holler before a dog does — and make a bigger fuss.”

🐍 Snake Patrol and Pest Control
They don’t just scream — they eat.

Peafowl are omnivores, which means:

Bugs ✅

Snakes ✅

Small rodents ✅

Garden slugs and crop pests ✅

Lucky Baldwin’s flock in California? Kept for beauty, yes. But also because they cut down on snakes. That same logic made its way into Southern farming folklore.

Now, let’s not pretend they’re perfect angels:

They’ll scratch up flowerbeds

They’ll p**p on your porch

And if you’ve got crops? Well… they might help themselves.

But for folks with land — especially the eccentric homesteader crowd — the tradeoff often felt worth it.

🪶 Feathers, Gifts, and Decoration
Even if you weren’t looking for a guard bird or a snake killer, you could still get something from your peacock:

Feathers.

Not plucked — just collected after molting season.
Peacock tail feathers were used for:

Decoration

Writing quills

Gifts

Spiritual charms (depending on your tradition)

Flannery O’Connor famously gave them to visitors at Andalusia. She saw her peafowl as sacred beings — but still handed out their feathers like calling cards.

Tomorrow on Day 5:
We go off-script. Not just the practical or the pretty — we explore the quirky, wild, legendary side of the peacock as a character, a companion, and sometimes even a neighborhood problem child.

🦚
“Proud as a Peacock” continues daily at 9AM.
These birds didn’t just land in the South — they made themselves part of the story.

19/06/2025

In the Green Hell—A Year in the Bush

The jungles of Vietnam became a world unto themselves—an endless, tangled wilderness where the air was heavy and the ground itself seemed to rise up against the men who walked it. The heat pressed down, sweat soaked every uniform, and each day brought a fresh battle with mud, insects, and exhaustion. Rain poured for days, filling foxholes, rotting boots, and turning the landscape into a maze of leeches and razor-edged grass. Here, the Southern draftee faced not just the enemy, but the relentless adversary of the land.

The enemy, too, was rarely seen. Instead of set battles, the war was fought in ambushes, sudden firefights, and the constant threat of b***y traps—mines, tripwires, pits lined with bamboo stakes. Every footstep could bring disaster. The line between soldier and civilian blurred; a farmer in the daylight could become a Viet Cong at night. The anxiety never lifted, sleep was fitful, and every movement was shadowed by uncertainty. Morale faltered as days blurred into weeks and the hope of survival shrank to the next meal, the next patrol, the next sunrise.

Camaraderie was forged in hardship and fear, and for many, it was all that kept them moving. The jungle left scars—on bodies, in minds, and in memory. For some, it was a crucible that changed them forever; for others, it became a nightmare that would never quite end.

Sources
Source Acknowledgment: This essay is based on historical accounts from The Unwilling Pilgrim: A Southern Draftee’s Journey Through the Vietnam War, compiled and curated by K. Brad Barfield. Dedicated to Kenneth Byron Barfield, Army 4th Division Infantry (1968–69).

19/06/2025

Layered Landscapes—The Archaeological Puzzle

In the forests where Ashley County leans west toward the Ouachita hills, the land does not offer its history in straight lines. It offers it in layers—mud and midden, stone and root, traces of hunters, farmers, gatherers, all pressed close together. For the archaeologist, this is both invitation and challenge. How do we read a land that never stopped being used?

The grinding stones of the Poverty Point tradition, shaped thousands of years ago from local sandstone, lie scattered not in tidy rows but in overlapping time. Nearby, in the same hollows and ridges, one finds tools and shards from much later peoples—especially the Caddo, who made this region their home from roughly A.D. 800 until European contact and beyond. Their ceramics, burial mounds, and stone tools sometimes resemble the earlier artifacts in form, but not always in context.

And so the question arises: how do we know what belongs to whom?

It turns out, this is not easily answered. In Ashley and Union Counties, the problem is compounded by erosion, looting, logging, and layers of repeated use. Sites that once may have been distinct are now blurred. Grinding bowls from the Poverty Point period might lie near arrowheads of a later time. Hearthstones shift when trees fall. Erosion collapses a bluff and mixes one world with another.

Archaeologists rely on a patient tangle of techniques: soil stratigraphy, radiocarbon dating, comparative morphology. But in south Arkansas, with its sandy soils and centuries of cultivation and logging, these layers are often disturbed. The sandstone tools themselves complicate things—they’re durable, yes, but also hard to date. A grinding stone doesn’t change style much over 1,000 years. One woman in 800 BCE might use a bowl nearly identical to one in 300 CE. And so the stone persists while the story around it blurs.

Still, certain clues help. Context matters. The deeper a tool lies, the older it’s likely to be—though this is not foolproof. Tool form also tells us something: the bowl-like metates with deep basins tend to trace back farther than the shallower slab types. Wear patterns reveal how a tool was used—and sometimes how long. In rare cases, residue analysis can uncover the ghost of a meal: traces of hickory, smilax root, or wild grapes ground to pulp on sandstone.

These aren’t just puzzles for curiosity’s sake. Untangling the past helps communities today understand the depth of their home’s story. For places like Fountain Hill, Chemin-A-Haut, or the Bartholomew bottoms, these tools root the land in ancient labor. They show that people were here long before county lines, long before cotton or pine, living by the rhythm of river and stone.

The work is far from done. Much of the Saline-Ouachita corridor remains lightly surveyed. Tributaries like Bayou de Loutre and Felsenthal’s swampy corners may yet yield stories. What’s needed is not just science but stewardship: the will to protect, preserve, and listen.

Because every stone has a voice—but only if someone is there to hear it.

Source Acknowledgment: This essay is grounded in research from "Sandstone Grinding Implements of the Poverty Point Era in the Riverine Landscapes of the Saline and Ouachita Rivers, Arkansas," alongside historical frameworks from Arkansas: A Narrative History (2013) and place-specific memory drawn from the Tim Hollis Collection and regional accounts housed in the Fountain Hill Scrapbook.

19/06/2025

Sentinels and Symbols: The Wildlife of the River Bottoms

Within the complex world of south Arkansas’s river bottoms, a handful of species stand out—not only for their beauty or rarity but because they tell us something deeper about the fate of the entire ecosystem. The Prothonotary Warbler, the Wood Duck, and the Louisiana Black Bear are more than inhabitants; they are living indicators, each a sentinel whose fortunes rise and fall with the health of the forest.

3.1. The Prothonotary Warbler: The Golden Canary in the Coal Mine

Flashing like a golden light through the shadowed understory, the Prothonotary Warbler (Protonotaria citrea) is the soul of the southern swamp. Unlike most warblers, it nests inside tree cavities—often in snags or hollow limbs above still water. This specialization means it is deeply tied to mature, structurally complex bottomland forests with plenty of standing dead wood. Its presence signals that all the essential ingredients of a healthy wetland—old trees, standing water, a mosaic of microhabitats—are intact.

But this warbler’s song is in decline. Since the 1960s, Prothonotary Warbler numbers have dropped dramatically, with habitat loss and the removal of dead trees for logging or “cleanup” among the chief threats. Where the warbler is found, it acts as a canary in the coal mine: a sign of vibrant, functioning swamps. Where it disappears, it warns that critical pieces of the ecosystem are missing.

3.2. The Wood Duck: A Story of Recovery and Resilience

If the warbler is the symbol of fragility, the Wood Duck (Aix sponsa) is the face of hope. This dazzling waterfowl—males with their iridescent crests, females with subtle beauty and striking eyes—also depends on tree cavities for nesting. Once near extinction due to habitat loss and overhunting, Wood Ducks bounced back thanks to a blend of conservation actions: the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, hunting regulations, and especially the installation of artificial nest boxes. Arkansas’s bottomlands now host strong Wood Duck populations, thanks in part to decades of active management and citizen involvement.

Every spring, Wood Ducks put on a spectacle of faith and survival: ducklings leap from tree hollows high above the water, tumbling to the ground below, guided by their mother’s call. Their story is a testament to what happens when people step in with focused effort—a reminder that even in a damaged landscape, resilience is possible.

3.3. The Louisiana Black Bear: The Return of an Icon

Towering over these smaller sentinels is the Louisiana Black Bear (Ursus americanus luteolus)—an apex species whose needs encompass the entire floodplain. The bear was driven to the brink by the same clearing and fragmentation that hurt the warbler and Wood Duck. By the 1990s, only scattered individuals survived. Its comeback, centered on restoration and landscape-scale habitat connectivity, is one of Arkansas’s great conservation success stories.

The return of the bear is a sign of true ecological healing. Unlike the duck or warbler, the bear needs vast, unbroken forests for food, denning, and travel—meaning that its recovery requires cooperation among landowners, government agencies, and local communities. In 2016, after years of restoration and reintroduction, the Louisiana Black Bear was removed from the Endangered Species List—a symbol of what’s possible when an entire system is restored.

Sources
This essay is based on research and findings from An Ecological and Faunal Comparison of the Saline and Ouachita Rivers in Southern Arkansas, compiled and curated by K. Brad Barfield. We acknowledge the invaluable input and inspiration of Jeremy Ballard, a follower of Ashley County Now, whose insights helped shape this series. Additional archival material was curated from the Ovid T. Switzer, Jr. Collection, of which we have on loan.

Ashley County Now

19/06/2025

19/06/2025

19/06/2025

19/06/2025

19/06/2025

19/06/2025

19/06/2025

19/06/2025

19/06/2025

19/06/2025

19/06/2025

Address

Telephone

Website

Alerts

Contact The Business

Shortcuts

Share