Populist News Wire (2025)

15/02/2024

For those touting the virtues of "clean energy"(it's not that clean) and EV:

It's not working out well, already, as it is totally overloading the grid, causing utilities to ask people to NOT get full charges for their vehicles.

With the grid expecting to double within the next 40 years and relying more and more on an unreliable grid of wind/solar, and with a far more complex grid dispersion to boot, one can only shudder.
A more complex grid also means fixes are also more complex. Simple logic.

My local utility is already experiencing more very costly transformer burnout due to the above variability of load, now with the additional complex variability of the generative process.

The days of keeping a generator spun up to handle that variability are going away, with the cost of storage of potential energy being far more costly, than a pile of coal outside the plant.

Expect a LOT more brownouts, requests for less usage, and rationing. We will be living in a real dark ages.

07/02/2024

One of the major principles/fundamentals, when discussing scientific phenomenon, is that of NOT making an overstatement. Sadly, overstatement/over assumption/hyperbole is very much a part of the AGW world, and it destroys their credibility.
While I am called a "denier" I do not deny climate change.
I do not deny we may be currently experiencing a warmer period.
I have no problem with finding other VIABLE sources of energy outside that of carbon based fuels, with wind/solar having very limited viability and extreme cost to boot.
Point is, you just don't chop off the hand to spite a finger, which is metaphorically being done in the climate change world. As we say in the medical community, "you don't use a garden hose to put out a single match and you don't use a garden hose on a forest fire"
However, I am questioning just how severe warming really is and if its not just transient in nature. Then, when I look at past CO2 levels, like 2000 ppm during the Triassic/Jurrasic, even more so, as life thrived during that time.
It's not uncommon and correlation/observation is not causality.
Point is, there is a LOT of really bad science behind the CO2 climate change mantra and its really easy to prove.

07/02/2024

Oh, the memories and life's lessons.
Some 50 years ago, while visiting my girlfriends parents., I took up a pickup basketball game with their next door neighbor kid, just a high school freshman.
I repeatedly kicked his butt. He simply did not hustle. And then his dad intervened. He said to his son, I will give your $20 dollars if you beat Bill. That was his cue and also my cue.
Well, the kid actually picked up the pace and worked hard. I slowed down my pace and worked less hard, basically throwing the game, guaranteeing him a win, but not by too much, as he would have figured that out.
His dad looked at me with a huge smile on his face while shaking his head. He knew and I think was thankful. I was not going to beat that kid down.
But his son, was none the wiser and learned the lesson of winning, hustle and hard work that day. A good life's lesson.

28/12/2023

Carbon credits is a scam. The ONLY people who benefit from that program are the wealthy elites like King Charles, as the cost of energy skyrockets for the rest. The elites benefit both financially and gain more power at the same time, as the middle classes become poor and the poor become desperate.
More importantly, desperation can go two ways:
1. The not elites can become the beggars of history.
or
2. The non elites can fight back and actually eliminate the wealthy elites.
And as more of our law enforcement, namely the military, sees their families evolve into great hardships, guess what side they will be on?
Only problem, this evolution takes time and in the meantime, many human lives will be lost to poverty for something that could have been prevented, had it not been for the greed and power sought by the elites.
Point is. The humanity is on a very slippery slope with such a program.

19/12/2023

Since this is the season for peace and love, I have a solution that can be applied to all here.
Several here want to eliminate the use of fossil fuels and they are adamant about it, regardless of the data presented. Net zero.
Here's what they need to personally do to satisfy their interests and fears. I will enumerate a few.
1. The first thing they can do is to rid themselves of their computers and the internet. Why? ALL parts of a computer and the internet are very much dependent on fossil fuels with little exception. If EV energy was even used to mine the minerals necessary the cost of computers and the internet would be so incredibly high they could no longer afford them.
Of course, the side benefit would be those of us with a lick of common sense would not have to listen to their continuous hysteria about the climate.
2. Housing. They need to build mud homes or stone homes using no mortar or nails as that also requires masses of energy to produce, especially mortar. Guess they could pound out their nails on a coal fired forge. LOL.
3. They could become hunter/gatherers once again, as no refrigeration would also decrease the load on the grid. Of course, individual wind or solar would also not be able to sustain household refrigeration. All they would have to do, in the colder climates, would be to chop and store ice. Screw those in warmer climates. And to quote Kamala Harris..."it's the science." Actually its the math.
4. They need to forsake all modern medicine as it is very much dependent on fossil fuels for both the product and the dispensation of modern medicine. And if you had taken any organic chemistry, you would already know that.
5. Food. They should grow ALL their own food or only purchase foods grown, or produced locally, eliminating farm equipment and transportation. And, of course, a LOT of jobs would also be eliminated in the process. Gonna really suck for the city people. Free ranging dog are not all that bad tasting. Cooking hint: Dog meatloaf is delicious. I actually mean that. If they can't screw them, too. Most don't produce much, anyway. But hey, we can depend on the kindness of the anti fossil fuel people to care for these people now out of a job or living in the cities. Right?
6. Transportation. Walking or getting a horse, maybe? Maybe in population dense areas we could have public transportation also powered by horses, as wind/solar are simply not enough to provide the transportation in our massively overpopulated cities. Again, per Harris, "it's the science."
The above solutions with make a major step in the goal of attaining net zero.
However, as individuals? Do your duty. Get rid of your tech products, build your own sod houses or stone house without mortar(the Inca's did it), no modern medicine and just live out your lives naturally, walk or horseback but no bikes as they require manufacturing using steel and a lot of heat, grow all your own food or become hunter/gatherers, make you own clothes out of natural fiber.
You can do it! I know you don't want to be hypocrites. If you considered it your personal adventure, you would not be such a pain in the ass to the rest of us.

13/12/2023

From my brilliant friend, Richard Cronin:

Below are examples of really good scientists who dare to challenge the CO2 climate change narrative.

John Clauser (Nobel Prize in Physics) has much to relate regarding the bullying and intimidation leveled at “deniers.”
A few years ago on the evening of Earth Day, Dr. John Christie, Univ. of Alabama, had his office shot up in a drive-by.
Judith Curry quit her position at Georgie Tech due to death threats.
Peter Ridd was let go from James Cook University for disputing the b.s. about the Great Barrier Reef “dying”. He appealed his termination all the way to the Australian Supreme Court and lost because it was deemed to have impugned the work of others.
Susan Crockford did not have her contract renewed at the Univ. of Victoria (Canada). The University did not say why. Of course, she disputes claims about the imminent extinction of the polar bears.
Caleb Rossiter worked at a think tank to foster development of nations in Africa. He wrote an editorial to the Wall Street Journal promoting the use of carbonaceous fuels would be one of the best ways to improve conditions. He was informed of his dismissal by a curt e-mail …. clean-up your office a clear out.
I belong to the American Geophysical Union and they are bewailing the fact that students aren’t getting into climatology studies ….. good say I.

06/12/2023

There are some extremely false narratives being spread by DC insiders and the press today. Of course, it's Trump's fault, ad nauseam.
It's discussed how Trump put our "farmers on welfare." That is NOT true about our farmers and is only a part of the antiTrump propaganda machine looking for use fools.
Why do I know that? I am a farmer, as well, hiring people to do my work. It's part of my daily life. Farmers wholeheartedly supported and still support Trump and his economic policy, as they knew what was good for our nation. It's not even close.
Trumps policy was to make America SELF RELIANT. He did that as he saw American technology escape to China, to a point it was making us rather subservient to China. Not a good thing. Example: About all antibiotics are manufactured in China! And it pi**ed off China, as they saw their lucrative markets declining.
And making America more self reliant included building Keystone. When that was cancelled by Biden it really harmed the economy of Fairbury, Nebraska, a small town relying on that pipeline, as it was to be a major hub. Jobs just went away.
Trump was doing a good job of creating a more austere budget, namely attacking wasteful spending by the Pentagon. Angered them, as well. He got our stealth technology at a lower cost. as well as with the production of AF-1.
Trump was succeeding until Pelosi came in and held the federal government hostage if they did not pass her spending bills, including some incredible wasteful spending when Covid hit, also remembering funds for the uber endowed and wealthy National Symphony. Hence Trump signed off on frivolous spending just to stay in business.
I don't know where you are getting your info on gas prices, but I do know its bogus. Trump not only brought to us less costly gas prices compared to Obama, he was able to do that while he rebuilt our strategic reserve! That's very important.
The ONLY reason gas prices have lowered now is because Biden has depleted our strategic reserve to some rather dangerous levels. It's a national security issue, at this point.
You wanna see how our nation was betrayed by politicians. Treason, if you will.
Go no farther than VP Joe Biden's deal with China, selling the US high tech company by the name of Henniges to Chinese bankers, who, in turn, provided lucrative investment opportunities for Hunter's several shell companies, amounting to millions.

20/06/2023

My response to a person who was denigrating those who challenge the narrative of CO2 climate change:

So, you're sure that human produced CO2 is causing the current climate change.
Here's a few inconvenient facts.
1. CO2 makes up but .0004 of the total atmospheric gaseous profile. NOT much.
2. Humans safely produce 12% of that, although some will say most of it. And they are grossly wrong. I actually looked at the stoichiometry used to measure the tonnage of human produced CO2. Its GROSSLY over-exaggerated. Why? They assume ALL carbon atoms from carbon fuels eventually becomes the carbon atoms of CO2 molecules. That has NEVER happened and never will happen.
I used as a basis for my conclusion actual physical research of which I was a part. We once studied the properties of particulate carbon using Raman spectroscopy.

22/05/2023

OH...that is good.

30/08/2022

Pretty good analogy, as analogies go.

Populist News Wire

15/02/2024

07/02/2024

07/02/2024

28/12/2023

19/12/2023

13/12/2023

06/12/2023

20/06/2023

22/05/2023

30/08/2022

Address

Telephone

Website

Alerts

Shortcuts

Share