10/03/2024
The Anatomy of Anti-Vegan Trolls
A Psychological & Sociocultural Breakdown
In the sprawling digital age, vegans find themselves facing an unusual adversary…drumroll…the anti-vegan troll. These trolls surface in almost every vegan social media post, armed with arguments that range from lazy to outright bizarre, often repeating themselves verbatim as if they’re reading from a collective troll manual. Their behavior, though seemingly ridiculous on the surface, is deeply entrenched in psychology, speciesist indoctrination, & social conditioning. Each type of troll presents a unique facet of this resistance to veganism, though they all share a common goal…to defend their dietary choices in a way that mocks or belittles vegan advocates. Below, we explore each archetype of anti-vegan trolls and why they seem to act in such predictable ways.
The Steak Picture Comment Troll
This troll wastes no time. The moment a vegan post hits their feed, they feel compelled to upload a photo of a steak…often oozing, seared, and center stage, as if its sheer existence is enough to invalidate the entire movement. Psychologically, this is a textbook example of provocation by visual stimulus. The steak represents defiance and is an assertion of dominance, mirroring primal instincts to showcase the consumption of meat as an evolutionary right.
In reality, this behavior stems from a learned association of meat with status and identity. For many, meat-eating is as much a cultural and familial symbol as it is a dietary choice. The steak-picture troll feels threatened by veganism not because they believe their meal is under attack, but because veganism challenges a core part of their identity and upbringing. Rather than engage in conversation, they rely on the visual equivalent of shouting—a juvenile attempt to elicit a reaction by flaunting what they perceive as the vegan "enemy."
The BBQ Gif Troll
Closely related to the steak-picture troll, the BBQ gif troll floods the comment section with looping clips of sizzling ribs, charred chicken wings, or flipping burgers. The purpose here is not just to incite but to drown out meaningful discourse with images that reinforce societal norms around meat consumption.
At its root, this is cultural reinforcement by repetition. By spamming imagery associated with BBQs…events tied to family, community, & celebration—this troll is reaffirming the social validation of meat-eating. BBQs, with their nostalgic & communal connotations, make it difficult for this troll to dissociate meat from personal joy. It’s a knee-jerk defense of tradition, wrapped in digital mockery.
The Laughing Troll
The laughing troll, often leaving strings of "😂😂😂," responds to any argument or fact with derision. Their laughter is not born from genuine humor but from discomfort. It's cognitive dissonance manifesting as ridicule. When confronted with facts that challenge their worldview…whether it be the environmental devastation of animal agriculture or the ethical implications of slaughter, this troll uses laughter to minimize their emotional discomfort & distance themselves from feelings of guilt.
By laughing, they hope to trivialize the vegan message, subtly reinforcing their belief that veganism is silly, extreme, or over-the-top. It's an attempt to shield themselves from cognitive conflict by mocking the messenger instead of confronting the message.
The ‘Lions Tho’ Troll
Ah, the classic Lions tho argument… Lions eat meat, so why shouldn’t we? This troll’s reasoning, though deeply flawed, reflects justification by natural fallacy. In their mind, pointing to carnivorous animals legitimizes human meat consumption. It’s a desperate attempt to align their behavior with nature, as though sharing an instinct with wild predators absolves them of ethical reflection.
The problem with this argument is that humans, unlike lions, have moral agency and the capacity for ethical reasoning. Lions eat meat because they must to survive…humans do not. However, this troll refuses to acknowledge the nuance, preferring the simplicity of “nature does it” to avoid grappling with uncomfortable ethical questions.
The Denialist
The denialist troll takes the approach of flat-out rejecting the reality of vegan claims. They’ll argue that factory farming isn’t cruel, that animals don’t suffer, or that veganism isn’t environmentally sustainable…despite mountains of evidence. This stems from a deep-rooted need to protect their worldview, a phenomenon often described as motivated reasoning. When faced with facts that challenge their behavior, the denialist selectively filters information to support their beliefs, even going so far as to deny the lived experiences of others.
For the denialist, acknowledging the suffering of animals or the harm caused by animal agriculture would necessitate a shift in behavior. It’s far easier to pretend these issues don’t exist than to engage with them meaningfully.
The 'Vegan Is a Cult' Troll
This troll loves to liken veganism to a cult, claiming that vegans are blindly following a movement without thinking for themselves. Ironically, this troll is projecting their own inability to question societal norms back onto the vegan. The accusation of veganism being a cult stems from in-group/out-group bias…the psychological tendency to view those who deviate from the societal norm as "other" or inherently wrong.
By calling veganism a cult, they attempt to invalidate it by placing it in the realm of irrationality, thus sidestepping any need to engage with vegan arguments. However, the irony is thick: the societal pressure to conform to meat-eating is far more pervasive & unexamined than any so-called vegan “cult.”
The 'Vegans Are na,zis' Troll
The “vegans are na,zis” troll takes the absurdity a step further, comparing vegan advocacy to some of the most heinous regimes in history. This tactic is false equivalence at its worst, designed to discredit vegans by associating them with extremism. Psychologically, this argument is the last-ditch effort of someone with no real argument left. By drawing an outrageous comparison, they hope to derail the conversation entirely, shifting the focus away from the ethical questions raised by veganism and onto a wildly inappropriate analogy.
The 'Plants Feel Pain' Troll
The plants feel pain troll loves to bring up the so-called suffering of plants in an attempt to undermine the ethical basis of veganism. While this argument has been debunked time & again…plants don’t have a central nervous system or the capacity to experience pain…this troll clings to it as a last-ditch effort to equate plant life with animal life.
Psychologically, this is moral equivalence gone wrong. By equating plants with animals, they hope to muddy the ethical waters, making it harder to draw a line between justifiable & unjustifiable harm. It’s a transparent attempt to deflect from the reality of animal suffering by invoking an irrelevant parallel.
The 'We Are Apex' Troll
The apex predator argument is yet another way for anti-vegan trolls to justify meat consumption by invoking nature. "We’re at the top of the food chain," they chant, as though this biological fact alone justifies all manner of cruelty. This is a clear case of speciesism…the belief that humans are superior to other animals, and therefore their needs & desires take precedence.
The apex predator argument, like the "Lions tho" argument, ignores the fact that humans, with their moral reasoning and ability to thrive without animal products, have long transcended mere survival. But for this troll, it’s easier to hide behind biology than to confront the ethical implications of their choices.
Most anti-vegan trolls are, at their core, uncomfortable with the cognitive dissonance caused by their dietary choices. Veganism confronts them with the uncomfortable truth that their food choices contribute to animal suffering & environmental degradation. Rather than engage with these facts, they lash out…projecting, deflecting, & clinging to culturally ingrained justifications that reinforce their behavior.
Diet is learned, and anti-vegan trolling is a social experiment that reveals just how deeply entrenched speciesist beliefs are. These trolls respond almost identically because they’re products of a culture that has normalized the consumption of animals while ignoring the ethical implications. They repeat the same arguments because these are the arguments they've been taught, passed down from family, society, and an animal agriculture industry that spends billions to maintain its grip on the public.
Anti-vegan trolls may come in many forms, but they all share a deep-seated discomfort with the reality that veganism forces them to confront. Whether they’re sharing BBQ gifs, invoking lions, or crying “plants feel pain,” their arguments are born from a culture that has normalized speciesism. Their resistance is less about genuine disagreement and more about protecting a way of life they’ve been conditioned to see as normal. Veganism challenges the status quo, and for many, that’s too much to handle…so they troll instead.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
