Holmes & Co.

Holmes & Co. Commentary from independent journalist Rick Holmes Rick Holmes writes editorials and columns for the MetroWest Daily News o and GateHouse Media.

17/12/2025

(My latest column, published in The Commons.)

Trump’s new war on drugs

After 50 years of failure, Trump still following Nixon’s playbook

By Rick Holmes

In the spring of 1971, President Richard Nixon faced crises on all sides, from the Pentagon Papers scandal to the rising tide of opposition to his Vietnam War. So he announced a War on Drugs.

Nixon’s motivations for launching his war were largely political. Use of ma*****na and other drugs was associated with Black and Hispanic people and with long-haired college students, his chief policy advisor later explained, and those were all groups that supported Democrats.

All these decades later, we have a president who got his political instincts from Nixon and who exceeds Nixon in his cynicism. So Donald Trump, beset by the Epstein scandal and rising opposition to his economic policies, has now declared his own War on Drugs.

Nixon’s War on Drugs was built on unspoken assumptions: That substance abuse was a problem better addressed by the criminal justice system than the public health system; that all drugs were all bad and abstinence was the only acceptable policy; and that experts were best ignored.

Thus Nixon appointed a special commission to study ma*****na policy, only to renounce it when it recommended decriminalizing pot possession. The National Institute on Drug Abuse, created in 1974, was prohibited in its founding documents from funding research on potential positive uses of drugs. Psychedelics, which had shown promise in the treatment of alcoholism and other illnesses, were classified as no better than he**in and all research ground to a halt.

Police power was expanded, with anti-drug task forces established at the local, state and federal levels. New prisons were built, and new laws enacted to fill them up with those who used and sold the forbidden drugs.

Nixon’s War on Drugs outlasted him and then some. The presidents who followed – Republican and Democrat alike – bought into the old, flawed assumptions. Ronald Reagan added a slogan: “Just Say No.” Amid public panic over crack co***ne, Bill Clinton (with an assist from then-Sen. Joe Biden) made drug sentences even longer. Two President Bushes kept Nixon’s war going at the federal level, while governors and legislatures at the state level, where most drug crimes are prosecuted, followed suit. War on Drugs politics ruled for generations. Politicians of both parties, at all levels of government, had to appear tough on drugs if they hoped to be elected.

For a half-century, America faced a new drug crisis every few years: ma*****na, L*D, co***ne, ecstasy, he**in, crack, m**hamphetamine, Oxycontin, fentanyl. The names of the drugs changed, but national drug policy was always the same: More police, more mass incarceration. The U.S. prison population rose from 328,000 in 1970 to 1.6 million in 2009. Billions in tax dollars were spent, millions of American lives disrupted. The War on Drugs went on and on, but the drugs kept winning.

For those who looked closely, there were lessons to be learned along the way. The crystal m**h epidemic showed drug addiction could be a rural phenomenon, not just an urban blight, and that hard drugs didn’t have to smuggled across the border. A m**h lab could be built in an isolated barn or the Breaking Bad camper. The crack epidemic prompted more incarceration, but those who have studied crack’s impact on big cities found the tide turned when young people, reinforced by Black movies and hip hop music, swore off the drug that they had seen decimate their neighborhoods. The opioid epidemic showed that a billion-dollar pharmaceutical company can be as heartless and destructive as the most notorious narcotics trafficker, and that driving up the price of street drugs isn’t a cure for addiction. When Oxy prices spiked, users just switched to he**in and fentanyl.

Eventually, America’s addiction crisis reached so deeply into largely white suburbs and rural communities that people started talking about alternatives to incarceration. In the last decade or so there’s been a quiet shift in drug policy. Voters, not politicians, led the charge to legalize ma*****na in half the country. Officials in conservative states, sick of ever-growing corrections budgets, were the first to put the brakes on mass incarceration. Biden apologized for the excesses of his 1992 crime bill and pardoned nearly 2,500 non-violent drug offenders. Research on psychedelics resumed, resulting in promising treatments for depression and other mental illnesses. Harm reduction strategies like safe injection sites and Narcan to reverse opioid overdoses are saving lives. New treatments for addiction are showing some success, and the stigma associated with what we now call Substance Abuse Disorder is being reduced. New research on brain functions, along with the experiences of families touched by the opioid crisis, reinforced a consensus that addiction is an illness, not a character flaw.

Then, a few steps down the road to a more humane drug policy, along came Donald Trump.

Trump has paid no attention to the new thinking on drugs. His campaign rhetoric on the subject reflects 1980s-level anti-drug hysteria: not just “lock ‘em up” but the death penalty for drug dealers. But he and his administration have a mixed record when it comes to drugs. Elon Musk brags about his use of ketamine and other psychedelics, while his DOGE cut $11 billion from public health spending on research, drug treatment and drug use prevention. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. talks frequently about his struggles with he**in and alcohol addiction, but since becoming secretary of Health and Human Services, he had devoted his energy toward undermining childhood vaccination, not helping adults dealing with substance abuse and mental illness.

Meanwhile, Trump has pardoned nearly 100 felony drug traffickers, including drug kingpins in Chicago and Baltimore. This month he pardoned the former president of Honduras, who had been convicted of taking bribes from the drug cartels that terrorized his country and facilitating the smuggling of more than 400 tons of co***ne into the U.S. Is that how you wage war on drugs?

“War on drugs” is a misleading term to begin with. Nations don’t go to war against substances, and mental illness isn’t fought with guns and prisons. “Narco-terrorists” – Trump’s term for the enemy – is even more misleading. Terrorism is the use of violence to achieve a political goal. Narcotics is a global industry with billions of customers. You can be a terrorist or you can be a narcotics supplier; you can’t be both at the same time.

When it comes to the “drugs” part of Trump’s War on Drugs, the president’s rhetoric and actions are contradictory, even incoherent. But what he really likes is the “war” part. So now he orders the military to blow up small boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific, no matter that the boats are too small to make it to the U.S. mainland. He threatens to bring his war to Venezuela, no matter that Venezuela mostly sends co***ne to Europe, not fentanyl to the U.S.

It's hard to know what’s really behind Trump’s war on drugs. He may be more interested in regime change and grabbing a piece of Venezuela’s massive oil reserves than in helping American families struggling with substance abuse. Either way, Trump’s war on drugs, like Nixon’s, is doomed to failure. “History repeats itself,” Karl Marx wrote, “first as a tragedy, second as a farce.”

Rick Holmes of Marlboro is a retired newspaper editor.

In Vietnam, celebrating the end of the American WarBy Rick HolmesHo Chi Minh City, Vietnam – Fifty years ago, North Viet...
26/04/2025

In Vietnam, celebrating the end of the American War

By Rick Holmes

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam – Fifty years ago, North Vietnamese tanks and Viet Cong soldiers streamed into Saigon from all sides, greeted by celebrating crowds. At the U.S. embassy and a CIA outpost on Gia Long Street, helicopters evacuated the last of the Americans, and the luckiest of their Vietnamese allies, to ships waiting offshore. It was the humiliating ending to America’s longest war, the only war we’d ever lost.

Back in the U.S.A., I was finishing my senior year in college. On the day Saigon fell – April 30, 1975 – my friends and I flew a Viet Cong flag, ordered a keg and threw a small party to celebrate. Saved, just barely, from the draft by a high lottery number, I fought against the war, not in it. I never set foot in Vietnam – until this year.

Don’t expect America to celebrate on April 30 this year. It’s the anniversary of events the young don’t remember and the old would rather forget.

But the Vietnamese remember, and all year they’ve been celebrating their victory in what they call the American War.

On Nguyen Hue Flower Street, in the heart of Saigon, displays celebrating the 50th anniversary of the victorious spring offensive of 1975 are sprinkled among the more gaudy giant snakes celebrating Tet, the lunar new year. There are grand patriotic pageants and teeming crowds of people taking photos of themselves and each other. An outdoor museum illustrates, day by day, the Spring Offensive that ended with the reunification of Vietnam. Everything is decorated in red and yellow, the traditional colors of Tet, and flags are abundant: the national flag, a yellow star on a red field, and the flag of the Communist Party, red with a yellow hammer-and-sickle.

Within days, Saigon was renamed Ho Chi Minh City, after the founder of modern Vietnam, who drove the French out of their Southeast Asian colonies and led the North Vietnamese government after the country was split in two. A huge statue of “Uncle Ho,” as he was affectionately known, stands at one end of Flower Street, in front of the French Colonial-era city hall.

On Flower Street, the symbols of communism decorate storefronts advertising capitalism’s most famous products: Chanel, Rolex, Cartier, McDonald’s. To an American visitor old enough to remember, this is jarring. We fought that war as part of a grand battle between capitalism and communism. If we lost in Vietnam, the argument went, communism – an economic system in which the government owned everything and free enterprise was prohibited – would spread throughout Southeast Asia and the world.

The American government turned out to be wrong about that, and so much more.

Hearts and minds

An hour and a half from downtown Saigon, the Cuci Tunnels keep wartime memories alive. The Viet Cong – guerilla fighters taking on America and its South Vietnamese allies – built miles of tunnels under forests, fields and villages. They hid in the tunnels by day and came out at night to wage crippling attacks on government forces.

Fifty years later, the section at Cuci is preserved to tell the story of those battles, mostly telling it to foreign tourists who know little about Vietnam’s 30-year struggle for independence. There are displays of captured tanks, unexploded bombs, secret entrances to the tunnel system and grisly b***y traps the Viet Cong set for their pursuers: deep pits lined with sharp steel spikes.

At the end of the tour, visitors are invited to go down into a tunnel and travel from one entrance to the next. Some of the tunnels have been widened to accommodate foreign tourists, often much larger than the typical Vietnamese of 50 years ago. Still, it’s as claustrophobic an experience as I’ve ever had, fully bent over and walking at first, crawling on hands and knees at the end. I can’t imagine living there.

The tunnels had storage rooms for food and ammunition, classrooms and medical offices. Families as well as soldiers slept in the tunnels, underground to escape the hell being unleashed above ground. American B-52s carpet-bombed the villages, forests and fields of South Vietnam. They dropped na**lm, a jellied gasoline intended to burn the jungle to the ground, the better to expose shipments of ammunition headed for the tunnels. They sprayed Agent Orange, a toxic defoliant, across the countryside, destroying crops and killing livestock. The idea was to drive Vietnamese civilians out of their homes in the Viet Cong-controlled villages and into cities, then under government control. The Pentagon said it was a way to win their “hearts and minds.”

Bombs and tourists

Luang Prabang, Laos – Vietnam’s war didn’t stay in Vietnam. Laos and Cambodia, the neighboring countries in what had been known as French Indochina, fell into civil strife soon after Ho Chi Minh’s forces sent the French packing at Dien Bien Phu. Supplies and ammunition for Viet Cong fighters in South Vietnam came from the north along the Ho Chi Minh Trail, which ran through both Cambodia and Laos. American B-52s ran through Laos and Cambodia too.

Laos is a poor, mountainous country most Americans couldn’t find on a map. The B-52s found it. American bombers hit Laos every nine minutes, 24 hours a day, for nine years. A third of the 80 million bombs dropped on Laos failed to explode. Despite efforts to clean up the unexploded ordinance, bombs and landmines are still exploding, killing Laotians at the rate of one per month, most of them children.

Up in the mountains, you can still see the craters left by American bombs, our Laotian guide tells me. On a boat ride up the Mekong River, I confess to him that I’m an American who lived through that war, protested against it, did everything I could to stop it. Still, I said, I feel I need to apologize for what my country did to your country.

“People don’t do these things,” he said with a shrug. “Governments do these things. Now, the American tourist is king.”

Politics and war

Siem Reap, Cambodia – The tourists start arriving well before dawn, using flashlights to find their viewing spots. Their phones turn in unison to capture the first rays of light hitting the ancient towers of the temple of Angkor Wat. A thousand years ago Angkor, the capital of the Khmer empire, was probably the largest city in the world. Its people built dozens of temples, each more magnificent than the last. They were dedicated to Hindu gods, then to Buddhism, going back and forth as religions vied for the devotions of kings and their subjects.

Up to a million people lived and flourished here for five centuries, until politics and war forced them to move. The jungle reclaimed the land, and the city of Angkor and its temples all but disappeared. The ruins were rediscovered by Europeans in the late 19th century, and a long process of restoring them began, interrupted often by politics and war.

Now tourists from every corner of the globe have discovered the Angkor temples again. They come at sunrise in part to avoid the even larger mid-day crowds. At night they crowd the streets of Siem Reap and the bars of Pub Street, a little bit of Times Square where the great Khmer Empire once stood. A huge new airport, built by the Chinese, welcomes more than 2.5 million visitors a year.

On the walk from the buses to the temple, tourists pass by a group of musicians, seated on a platform, playing traditional instruments. Those paying attention will notice the prosthetic limbs. These are victims of the millions of landmines planted in Cambodia over decades of modern war.

The United States invaded Cambodia in 1970, part of its campaign against the North Vietnamese Army and its supply routes. America supported a coup against Cambodia’s popular monarch, and a civil war tore the country apart. An estimated 300,000 Cambodians were killed in the war, as much as half of them from U.S. bombs. America’s ally in Cambodia was defeated the same month its ally in South Vietnam was driven from Saigon.

At an active Buddhist temple a short walk from our hotel, a pile of skulls tells what happened next. The winners of the civil war, who became known as the Khmer Rouge, set out to build a new Cambodia by wiping out the old. They ordered the cities emptied, their populations forced into field work. They went on a killing spree, beginning with local officials, bureaucrats, professors and teachers. They stripped Buddhist monks of their robes and privileges and knocked the heads off Buddha statues at Angkor Wat.

The temple in Siem Reap was one of hundreds of ex*****on sites that collectively became known as the Killing Fields. A small park preserves what had been a well, used for drinking water before the Khmer Rouge filled it with bodies. “This mass grave recently has been excavated and (they) found 23 more bodies,” a sign reads. “Some of them are children. The victims were beheaded, hacked and whacked with iron bars, machetes, axes and hoes by the Khmer Rouge Regime Executors.”

Hundreds of skulls peer out from behind glass doors in a memorial nearby, their identities still unknown, some of the 1.3 million victims of the Khmer Rouge genocide. Their killing didn’t stop until Vietnam’s invasion in 1979.

Today, Cambodia is a strongman state, with a popular but powerless king and a powerful political dynasty that has wiped out the independent press. Cambodia doesn’t hide its ruined temples or the bones of the Killing Fields, but it’s still suffering from 50 years of politics and war.

War in the North

Hanoi, Vietnam – The capital of Vietnam feels less modern than Saigon, especially in the Old Quarter, where merchants in narrow storefronts have sold locally-made products for centuries. Today, the sign above many stores reads Made In Vietnam. Inside, they sell Nike sneakers, North Face jackets and Apple earbuds, all made in Vietnam.

Other parts of Hanoi reflect the influence of Soviet Russia. The grand plaza between the National Assembly building and Ho Chi Minh’s mausoleum is as empty as the Old Quarter is crowded. Ho Chi Minh died in 1969, leaving instructions in his will that he should be cremated, like most Vietnamese. But the party leaders who succeeded him preferred to follow the example of their patrons in Moscow. Like Lenin, Uncle Ho was embalmed, with his remains on permanent display in a fortress-like temple, because the regime’s legitimacy still rests on his cult of personality.

There was a time when Vietnamese students were required to learn Russian. Now they are required to learn English.

Hanoi is a city of lakes, one of which my Hanoi guide, insists on calling John McCain Lake, because that’s where the late U.S. senator splashed down after his plane was shot out from under him during a bombing run in 1967. McCain was dragged ashore, beaten by some of the people he’d been bombing, and locked up in Hoa Lo Prison. Americans of a certain age will remember the Hoa Lo Prison by the name POWs gave it: the Hanoi Hilton.

The prison is a museum now, popular especially with foreign visitors. Up until 1954, the French ran the prison, where it housed political prisoners agitating for independence. Visitors can see cells where prisoners were shackled to the floor, the dungeon where they were tortured, the guillotine that delivered their final punishment.

It also tells the story of Vietnam’s resistance to American bombing, especially in December 1972, which the Americans call the “Christmas bombing” and Vietnam calls “the Dien Bien Phu of the air.” More than 20,000 tons of bombs were dropped on the Hanoi area and more than 1,600 civilians were killed. In the twisted vernacular of the time, the operation was intended to “bomb the Vietnamese to the peace table.”

A few months later an agreement was signed, the POWs were released, and the U.S. brought its combat units home. Nixon and Henry Kissinger, his top advisor, wanted a “decent interval” between the American exit and a North Vietnam victory, which turned out to be about two years.

Communism and capitalism

Neither peace nor prosperity followed North Vietnam’s glorious victory of 1975. Vietnam had a brief border war with China, its traditional rival to the north, and invaded Cambodia to get rid of the China-backed Khmer Rouge. The communist victors imprisoned thousands of South Vietnamese in brutal “reeducation camps.” They imposed a centrally planned economy, which proved disastrous. In the years that followed, up to a million Vietnamese fled tyranny and poverty, most of them undertaking dangerous travel on overcrowded ships. The refugees became known as the “boat people,” and many eventually found homes in the U.S.

By the mid-1980s with Vietnam considered one of the poorest countries in the world, and with millions of its people starving, its rulers instituted reforms that gave the communist nation a capitalist economy. It legalized private property and invited foreign investment, and a slow recovery began.

A display in the Hanoi Hilton, titled “Reconciliation,” spotlights McCain’s return to Vietnam in 1995. President Bill Clinton had charged Sen. McCain, a Republican who spent eight years as a POW in the Hanoi Hilton, and Democratic Sen. John Kerry, a Vietnam veteran who had become an antiwar activist, with defusing the POW/MIA issue that had divided the two nations long after the warfare ended. Conspiracy theorists and Hollywood producers had promoted the myth that Americans were still being held in secret POW camps decades after the war. Once Kerry and McCain vouched for Vietnam’s efforts to find and return the remains of those missing in action, full diplomatic relations were restored between the U.S. and Vietnam. Economic sanctions were lifted and American investors and corporations began to pour in: Intel, Apple, Adidas, Cargill and more. Half of Nike’s sneakers are now made in Vietnam.

Today, Vietnam is a globalization success story, with a fast-growing economy and a sharply improved standard of living. It produces cheap sneakers for America and the world and profits for corporate giants. Its growing middle class is a rich market for U.S. exports.

Vietnam is also a bulwark against China. In recent years, China has been courting Southeast Asia with investments and goodwill. It has funded hydropower plants on the Mekong River, the new Siem Reap airport and a highspeed rail link between the capital of Laos and China. China’s diplomatic and economic initiatives are matched by its military encroachments in what most call the South China Sea. Vietnam, with historic sensitivity on the subject, calls it the “East Sea,” and has become a key U.S. ally in keeping its sea lanes open.

All these factors led President Joe Biden in 2023 to visit Hanoi and sign agreements that elevated Vietnam’s status as a trading partner. Then we had an election.

The Trump era

Vietnam remains an authoritarian state, where one party rules and freedom of expression is limited. The party line blares several times a day from loudspeakers mounted on telephone poles in Hanoi, as it has for decades. “But nobody listens to them,” my guide tells me, “now that they have YouTube.” For professional guides like him, restrictions have eased in recent years, he says, and he can answer visitors’ questions with more candor, especially when they are back in the bus. But in public places, like the Ho Chi Minh Mausoleum and the Hanoi Hilton, he must be careful.

His grandmother, who fled to South Vietnam when the country was partitioned in 1954, refused to travel to the north long after reunification, my guide says. But the next generation of northerners moved south to find jobs, and the next generation forgot all about the partition and the American War. As for young Vietnamese today, “what they think about America is how can they go there and make money.”

Many have already gone to the U.S., lots of them illegally, he says, and now they are worried President Donald Trump will send them home.

That’s not the only change Trump has brought to Southeast Asia. His on-again, off-again tariffs – as high as 46 percent for Vietnam – threaten decades of economic cooperation and American investment. Within days of Trump’s tariff announcement, Chinese President Xi Jinping was in Hanoi, signing new agreements on trade and development of Vietnam’s rare earth mineral deposits.

The Trump administration has been breaking promises across Southeast Asia. It threatened to halt the cleanup of an enormous toxic waste site left behind by America’s use of Agent Orange. Trump has halted support for independent media in Cambodia and for projects clearing landmines and unexploded ordinance. When the U.S. freeze on funding forced a mine-clearing organization in Cambodia to close down, China rushed in funds to keep it open.

And when a major earthquake killed thousands in Myanmar and shook the region, the United States, traditionally the leader in emergency assistance, barely lifted a finger. Again, China was there to fill the gap, offering far more aid than the U.S.

Vietnam will celebrate its big anniversary next week with a grand parade through Saigon. Marchers will include military units from Laos, Cambodia and China, but not the U.S. The American ambassador and other U.S. representatives were scheduled to attend the festivities, but they’ve now been ordered to stay home, the New York Times reports.

A joint U.S./Vietnam exhibit had also been planned for Vietnam’s War Remnants Museum, which has long been dedicated to documenting American atrocities. The display was to highlight reconciliation between the two former enemies. But it was being put together by USAID and the National Institute for Peace, two of the agencies Trump is trying to disband, and now it’s been indefinitely postponed.

This is Trump’s foreign policy at work, marked by economic bullying, disrespect for prior commitments, disdain for allies, casual cruelty and corruption. One of the first things Vietnam did after Trump announced his tariffs was to try to win the American president’s favor by fast-tracking a $1.5 billion resort planned by the Trump Organization. This is not how you win hearts and minds, in Vietnam or anywhere else.

When Biden visited Hanoi two years ago, he took the long view, tracing “a 50-year arc of progress between our nations, from conflict to normalization, to this new elevated status.” For now, at least, that progress has stalled.

Selling the Presidential Medal of FreedomAug. 19, 2024Donald Trump caught some deserved criticism from veterans last wee...
19/08/2024

Selling the Presidential Medal of Freedom

Aug. 19, 2024

Donald Trump caught some deserved criticism from veterans last week for saying the Presidential Medal of Freedom is the equivalent of the Congressional Medal of Honor.

“It's actually much better,” Trump said, “because everyone gets the Congressional Medal of Honor, they're soldiers. They're either in very bad shape because they've been hit so many times by bullets or they are dead. She gets it and she's a healthy, beautiful woman. And they're rated equal, but she got the Presidential Medal of Freedom.”

First, the medals aren’t equal, or even equivalent. “Not even close,” retired Marine Gen. John Kelly told CNN. “The Medal of Honor is earned, not won, by incredibly brave actions on the battlefield under fire, typically by very young men who joined when others did not to defend their country.” The nation’s highest military honor, it is awarded after careful investigation by the Pentagon.

By contrast, the Presidential Medal of Freedom can be awarded to anyone, civilian or military (Colin Powell got it twice); citizen or foreigner (Lyndon Johnson gave it to Pope John XXIII, and George W. Bush gave it to Nelson Mandela). Presidents have sole authority in the matter; they can give the recognition to anyone they like. They also can give out as many as they like: Barack Obama awarded 118 medals during his two terms; Trump awarded 24 in his single term, including to the “healthy, beautiful woman” Trump was referring to. Her name is Miriam Adelson. What did she do to earn the nation’s highest civilian honor? We’ll get to that, but first a primer on the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

Established in 1963, the Presidential Medal of Freedom is, alongside the Congressional Gold Medal, considered the nation’s highest civilian honor. The list of recipients is a most distinguished bunch, drawn mostly from public service (Anthony Fauci, Henry Kissinger, Nancy Pelosi), the arts (Norman Rockwell, Steven Spielberg, Bob Dylan) and sports (Ted Williams, Bill Russell, Megan Rapinoe). Ronald Reagan hung the medal around the necks of his Hollywood buddies (Frank Sinatra, James Stewart, Helen Hayes). Obama honored more basketball players, while Trump elevated golfers. Joe Biden’s 38 honorees include Denzel Washington, Al Gore, Steve Jobs and Simone Biles.

The honor has never been rescinded, though there’s been talk of taking back Bill Cosby’s award, given by George W. Bush in 2002. The award has been refused by recipients three times: twice by Dolly Parton, who declined Trump’s invitation first because her husband was ill and a second time citing Covid; once by New England Patriots coach Bill Belichick in response to the Jan. 6 insurrection.

There are 652 Medal of Freedom honorees, and while they aren’t equally deserving (Tennessee Ernie Ford?), presidents have done a pretty good job choosing people whose contributions to the nation are genuine and significant. They include Martin Luther King Jr., Walt Disney, Helen Keller, John Steinbeck, Neil Armstrong, Rachel Carson, Walter Cronkite, Thurgood Marshall, Fred Rogers, Rosa Parks and Muhammad Ali.

Then there are Trump’s nominees: Babe Ruth, Elvis Presley aren’t exactly contemporary, but OK. You can make a case for Mariano Rivera, Roger Staubach and Antonin Scalia. But while other presidents honored their political allies, those nominees tended to be statesmen like Bob Dole, Walter Mondale or Tip O’Neill. Trump gave the Medal of Freedom to two of his most rabid defenders in the House, Devin Nunes and Jim Jordan. While other presidents recognized great journalists, Trump gave the award to Rush Limbaugh, the nation’s most divisive propagandist.

As for Miriam Adelson, her contributions to the nation are negligible. An Israeli-born physician, in 1991 she married Sheldon Adelson, owner of the Sands Casino empire. Since her husband’s death in 2021, she’s been ranked as the fifth wealthiest woman in the U.S., worth an estimated $35 billion. But her contributions to Donald Trump are huge. The Adelsons were major donors to Trump’s campaign in 2016 and helped underwrite his inauguration. They gave $90 million to a Super PAC supporting Trump in 2020. And at Trump’s Bedminster, NJ, golf club Thursday, she went one better, pledging $100 million to get Trump re-elected in November.

And that’s the story most people have missed. It’s not just that what Trump said about the Congressional Medal of Honor disrespects veterans. It’s not just that a billionaire can purchase a presidential campaign. It’s that Donald Trump – who sold presidential pardons, who sold overpriced hotel rooms to the Secret Service and who, we’re now learning, may have taken a $10 million bribe from the government of Egypt – also sold the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the nation’s highest civilian honor, for millions in campaign cash.

Address


Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Holmes & Co. posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

  • Want your business to be the top-listed Media Company?

Share