KungFu & Action Icons

KungFu & Action Icons Martial arts, action, and more

12/09/2025

😳📢Steven Seagal questioned Jean Claude Van Damme’s real kickboxing record and Mocked Him as a ‘small Hollywood tough guy’ but turned down a $ 20 million offer to fight Jean Claude Van Damme. What are the details of the feud between Steven Seagal and Jean Claude Van Damme?

🥷🤜🥋In the 1990s, Steven Seagal and Jean-Claude Van Damme became the era’s most talked-about action-star rivals—a clash fueled by ego, martial arts credibility, and decades of public jabs. The conflict began in 1991 when Seagal went on The Arsenio Hall Show and dismissed Van Damme’s fighting background, implying JCVD’s kickboxing credentials were exaggerated. Van Damme, who did have competitive experience (even if some titles were overstated), took the dig personally, especially since Seagal had a habit of belittling other martial artists.

🤜📢The feud escalated in 1997 at a Miami party hosted by Sylvester Stallone, where Van Damme challenged Seagal to fight on the spot. According to Stallone and other witnesses, Seagal refused to engage and avoided the confrontation, cementing his reputation among stunt performers as someone who talked tough but ducked real challenges. Around the same time, producer Peter Guber tried to arrange a $40 million cage match between the two; Van Damme was willing, but Seagal never agreed, reinforcing the perception that he wouldn’t risk a real bout.

😳📢Through the 2000s, both men continued trading small public insults—Seagal mocking Van Damme as a “Hollywood tough guy,” Van Damme responding with mild, humorous remarks. Their careers diverged: Van Damme embraced self-aware roles and remained culturally beloved, while Seagal drifted into low-budget films and controversy.

😳📢Then, unexpectedly, in 2025 the two appeared together celebrating Seagal’s 73rd birthday. Van Damme posted a friendly video, framing their old feud as youthful posturing. Fans were shocked but intrigued, joking about deepfakes and demanding a team-up.

😳📢In the end, their rivalry symbolized the ’90s action-film era—authentic martial arts versus Hollywood mythmaking. Van Damme’s humility and adaptability aged well; Seagal’s bravado didn’t. But their public reconciliation offered a rare feel-good epilogue to one of Hollywood’s most infamous macho showdowns.

12/09/2025

📢📝"Steven Seagal has a tendency to cheese off the wrong people, and you can get hurt doing that…So Steven Seagal talked too much and I shut him up", Said Judo Gene LeBell after choking Seagal Out on the movie set.

📢📝The long-circulated story about Gene LeBell choking out Steven Seagal comes from the set of Out for Justice in 1991. Seagal—known for his swagger and aikido background—claimed he was immune to chokes and dismissed grappling techniques as inferior. Gene “Judo” LeBell, a highly respected judoka and stunt veteran, accepted the challenge after Seagal repeatedly questioned his skills.

😍🤜In a small trailer with several stuntmen and bodyguards watching, LeBell applied a rear-naked choke at Seagal’s invitation. Seagal allegedly struck LeBell in the groin trying to break free, but LeBell took him down, secured the hold, and choked him unconscious within seconds.

😍📝The most sensational part of the tale—the claim that Seagal involuntarily defecated (sh*tted his pants)—remains disputed. LeBell never confirmed it, though he also never denied the choke itself, and many stunt performers have repeated the story with varying levels of embellishment. Seagal has always dismissed the entire incident as fabricated.

📢📝😳The reason the story has endured is simple: it symbolized a clash between movie-martial-arts bravado and real grappling technique. It reinforced LeBell’s legendary status and damaged Seagal’s reputation for toughness. Whether or not the “soiling” detail is true, the choke is broadly accepted among those who were there, and the episode has become a staple of martial arts folklore—essentially a reminder not to challenge a true grappling master.

12/07/2025

📢📝Why did Steven Seagal claim that Bruce Lee didn't impress him? Seagal cited Lee's focus on performance and 'lack of full-contact experience' to support his claim that Bruce's abilities were 'developed for the screen rather than actual combat'.

📢😍🤜Steven Seagal, who is well-known for his action movies and Aikido training, has openly voiced doubts about Bruce Lee's fighting skills, frequently portraying Lee more as a performer than a skilled fighter. Although Seagal has stated in interviews (such as a 2012 conversation with Michael Schiavello) that he met and even sparred with Lee—stories that have been widely refuted due to timeline inconsistencies (Seagal was a teenager when Lee died in 1973 and had no documented contact), his main criticism of Lee is that he lacks verified real-world fighting credentials.

📢📝🥋Important Arguments from Seagal's Point of View:

📝Seagal's remarks are consistent with a larger criticism made by some traditional martial artists who believe that Lee's Jeet Kune Do philosophy and cinematic achievements are exaggerated:

📝 Lack of Full-Contact or Tournament Experience: According to Seagal, Lee was not put to the test in competitive or no-holds-barred situations. Lee only had two recorded fights: a private challenge match against Wong Jack Man in 1964 (a contentious, unresolved street-style bout) and a high school boxing match in 1958 (a victory over an inexperienced opponent). In contrast to grapplers or full-contact karate practitioners like Chuck Norris, Seagal, who places a strong emphasis on practical application in Aikido, believes that this is insufficient evidence of elite fighting ability.

📝Emphasis on Performance Over Practicality (such as one-inch punches and high kicks) over tried-and-true methods: Seagal has referred to Lee as a "actor and a dancer" first. Seagal contrasted this with his own purported real-world applications in the same 2012 interview, implying that although Lee's style appeared impressive on screen, it wouldn't hold up in a direct confrontation. This reflects opinions in martial arts circles that Lee's strength and speed were genuine but unproven against skilled opponents in uncontrolled combat.

12/07/2025

😳📢🤜⚡The irony hits hard: Steven Seagal called Bruce Lee “just a movie guy” … and the man who helped train Bruce Lee—Judo Gene LeBell—was the same legend who choked Seagal out on set and left Seagal unconscious⚡🤜. “He talked too much, so I shut him up”, Judo Gene LeBell said.

📢⚡📝What Actually Happened
• When: Around 1991–1992, during filming or preparation for the movie Out for Justice (1991).
• Context: Seagal was on set bragging that his Aikido wrist locks and techniques were so advanced that no one could choke him from behind because he could supposedly “relax the neck muscles” and resist any rear-naked choke or neck crank.
• Challenge: Gene LeBell, a legendary judo champion, stuntman, grappler, and one of the toughest men in Hollywood at the time, was working as a stunt coordinator or referee on the set. He took Seagal up on the claim.
• The result: LeBell got behind Seagal, applied a choke (accounts vary between a rear-naked choke and a judo-style neck crank), and Seagal quickly went limping and unconscious. Multiple eyewitnesses (including stuntmen and crew) say Seagal also lost control of his bowels when he woke up — a detail that has followed him ever since (Seagal has always denied the “pooped his pants” account about the incident).

📢📝⚡🥋Why This Matters in the Bruce Lee Context

Gene LeBell had a long friendship with Bruce Lee:
• He trained Lee in judo throws, grappling, and ground fighting in the late 1960s.
• Lee respected LeBell immensely and credited him with helping round out his Jeet Kune Do with real grappling knowledge.
• LeBell appeared in the famous “lost interview” footage with Lee and was one of the few men Lee openly praised as legitimately tough.

📝📢🤜So, when Seagal started dismissing Bruce Lee as “just a movie guy” and claiming no one could choke him, the irony was brutal: the same man who taught grappling to Bruce Lee had just choked Seagal unconscious on a movie set.
Seagal has never fully acknowledged the loss in public interviews. When pressed, he either denies it happened or claims it was “staged for the movie.” Gene LeBell, until his death in 2022, always stuck to the same straightforward version: “He talked too much, so I shut him up.”

12/05/2025

Remembering Jacky Chan #

12/04/2025

JCVD vs Bolo

12/03/2025
12/03/2025

😳🤜📢Steven Seagal once dismissed Bruce Lee's abilities, calling him overrated and more of a performer than a fighter. Seagal said Lee's speed was "impressive on film" but ineffective in real combat.

📝📢In the Rogan interview, Seagal dismissed Lee's abilities, calling him overrated and more of a performer than a fighter. He said Lee's speed was "impressive on film" but ineffective in real combat, adding, "I wasn't blown away by his martial arts."

📝🤜📢Seagal contrasted this with his own Aikido, implying Lee's striking style wouldn't hold up against grappling or redirection techniques.

👏🤜📝📢The Reality: Lee's peers (e.g., Chuck Norris, who fought him in Way of the Dragon) and students rave about his explosive power, one-inch punch, and innovative Jeet Kune Do hybrid style. Lee emphasized practical fighting over showmanship, training rigorously (150 finger push-ups). Seagal's critique ignores Lee's street-fighting background in Hong Kong and his influence on MMA.

🥋🤜📝📢Critics note Seagal's bias: Aikido shines in controlled demos but falters in no-rules scraps, while Lee's adaptability would likely overwhelm.

🤜😍📢📝Backlash: This irked Lee's inner circle. Enter the Dragon co-star Bob Wall (a black belt) was so furious he rallied a group of martial artists (dubbed the "Dirty Dozen") to confront Seagal in the 1990s. Seagal backed down and later apologized to Wall privately.

12/03/2025

Bolo Yeung amazing

12/02/2025
12/02/2025
12/02/2025

Address

9482 BEAVER CREEK Lane
Fishers, IN
46037

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when KungFu & Action Icons posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share