Foreign Policy Observer

Foreign Policy Observer Following US foreign policy with a critical eye. Views from outside the mainstream media. I am a mix of an anti-war idealist with some Mearsheimer-style Realism.

Plus throw in some wisdom from Noam Chomsky. Per Chomsky, I think western elites manufacture and manipulate public opinion using the media - especially when it comes to foreign policy! I hope to expose people to news and opinions that they might not otherwise hear.

*I deliberately do not source from RT or Sputnik to avoid being labeled as a Kremlin stooge.

“Nobody, of course, wants the war to continue because there have been a lot of sacrifices, a lot of victims. But at the ...
12/07/2025

“Nobody, of course, wants the war to continue because there have been a lot of sacrifices, a lot of victims. But at the same time we don’t want to give up, to give our land because we don’t then want those sacrifices to be wasted,” Bohdan says, dirt still on his hands and uniform.

It is a familiar sentiment across the unit. Andriy, a 31-year-old sergeant responsible for drone operations at the unit’s command point, when asked about Ukraine handing over land for peace responds by saying, “Do you want me to be honest?”, before adding: “It’s fu***ng bullsh*t.” A group of comrades who have been quietly listening in burst out laughing in agreement.

But for all the defiance of Bohdan and many other soldiers like him, there are strains elsewhere. A Ukrainian military psychologist said between 3% and 5% of those returning from frontline deployments needed further examination or treatment, in addition to those killed or wounded. Bohdan and Ivan were being monitored to ensure they could be sent back to the front.

A record 21,602 went absent without leave from the Ukrainian army in October. A frequent complaint across the military is the lack of reserves, meaning there is a shortage of troops available for rotations. Long deployments at the front are common.

As peace hopes falter, infantry soldiers face more long deployments risking their lives against Russian attacks

12/06/2025

You know things aren’t going well for Ukraine when both the NYT and WaPo have stories on it

Ominous maps of a falling fortress city reveal a change in Ukraine warOn Tuesday, Russian President Vladimir Putin decla...
12/06/2025

Ominous maps of a falling fortress city reveal a change in Ukraine war

On Tuesday, Russian President Vladimir Putin declared that Russia had taken the Ukrainian town of Pokrovsk, marking the culmination of a 20-month campaign. Ukraine denied the town had fallen, saying that its troops were still in control of the north.

Most military analysts believe Pokrovsk will eventually succumb. When it does, it will mark a Pyrrhic victory for Russia that is unlikely by itself to unravel Ukraine’s defense in the country’s east.

But though the final capture of the town will provide Russia only marginal tactical benefits, the campaign shows that the Russian military is learning and adapting — which, if gone unchecked, could foreshadow serious trouble for Ukraine in the near to medium term.

Pokrovsk had a prewar population of 60,000 and occupies 11.42 square miles of terrain (approximately 8.5 Central Parks). Despite being a small town, Pokrovsk played an important role because of its proximity to logistical supply lines: the E-50 highway (one of only three highways connecting the contested eastern region of Donetsk to the rest of Ukraine) and a railroad line that connects the Ukrainian-held portions of Donetsk to the logistical hub of Dnipro city and the rest of the country — key for routing supplies to Ukraine’s frontline forces.

The Kremlin is hyping the importance of the capture of Pokrovsk in order to portray Russia’s battlefield advances as inevitable. That sense of inevitability is being echoed by some members of President Donald Trump’s negotiating team trying to pull together a peace proposal for the Ukraine war.

But nothing is inevitable. In reality, Russia has paid a heavy price for its relentless campaigning in Donetsk. Over the past 20 months, Russian forces have advanced only about 25 miles from Avdiivka to Pokrovsk. Russian forces lost at least five divisions’ worth of armored vehicles and tanks (more than 1,000 armored vehicles and over 500 tanks) in the Pokrovsk area since beginning offensive operations to seize Avdiivka in October 2023 through the summer of 2024.

Since then, Russian forces have changed their tactics to deprioritize mechanized assaults in favor of small unit infantry infiltration missions, likely to preserve vehicles that have low survivability against Ukraine’s drones. This switch has enabled Russian forces to continue advances at literal footpace and at high losses.

In just the Pokrovsk area, Russian forces gained only about 12 square miles in October this year. During the same period, they reportedly lost 25,000 troops.

Pokrovsk’s fall is unlikely to result in a breakthrough for the Russians. The forces arrayed there, now well-versed in grinding positional warfare, lack the capacity to move quickly to take more land. And with Russia estimated to have suffered more than 1 million casualties and more than 250,000 killed, and with recruitment failing to fully make up the losses, Russia lacks the troops to decisively punch through at scale — especially since Ukraine maintains a dense field fortification network immediately west of Pokrovsk.

Nevertheless, in this campaign the Russians have demonstrated a newly developed operational template for seizing Ukrainian towns: First, systematically degrade Ukraine’s logistics lines with drones, then send in infantry assault and infiltration groups to overwhelm the beleaguered defenders. Specifically, Russia’s ability to weaken Ukraine’s battlefield position with intermediate range strikes is a troubling development.

Ukraine’s defense of the fortress belt — the highly fortified towns of Slovyansk, Kramatorsk, Druzhkivka and Kostiantynivka — will be greatly complicated if Russia can deny Ukraine the railroads and highways needed to supply these strongpoints. Indeed, Russia is already attempting to replicate its lessons from Pokrovsk. In early November, Ukraine shut down rail traffic to Kramatorsk, likely due to encroaching Russian drone threats.

Ukraine needs to find a way to counter this template. It needs to field more effective drone countermeasures to protect its rear, while at the same time better targeting Russia’s drone operators. To do so, Ukraine will need to improve its ability to strike intermediate-range targets some 40 to 60 miles beyond the front. Un-jammable drones currently in development by Ukraine’s entrepreneurial start-ups are part of that solution.

But to truly stop the Russians, Western aid remains vital. Ukraine needs intelligence sharing to continue, as well as a fresh supply of more conventional weapons to engage midrange targets, including artillery and rockets. As long as Russia keeps making battlefield gains, it is unlikely to pursue meaningful negotiation to end the war. All of the Trump administration’s diplomacy will amount to little until Russia’s advances are stopped cold.

Putting Russia’s campaign to capture the Ukrainian fortress city into perspective.

12/06/2025

If you would like to read the new US National Security Strategy for yourself, here it is.

Battlefield Picture Worsening for Ukraine as Trump Pushes Peace PlanIt was a clear attempt to project Russian power.Hour...
12/06/2025

Battlefield Picture Worsening for Ukraine as Trump Pushes Peace Plan

It was a clear attempt to project Russian power.

Hours before meeting U.S. officials in Moscow this past week about their plan to end the war, President Vladimir V. Putin claimed that Russia’s forces had seized the strategic Ukrainian city of Pokrovsk after a monthslong fight.

The reality was murkier. Slivers of the city were still contested, according to battlefield maps and the Ukrainian military. But Mr. Putin’s claim, even if premature, reflected a trend shaping his unbending approach to negotiations: Russian forces are on the march.

“The Russians do have the upper hand,” said Emil Kastehelmi, a military analyst with the Finland-based Black Bird Group. Ukraine is not yet at the point where it must capitulate, he said, but it “is looking weak enough that the Russians think that they can impose demands.”

Mr. Putin has ordered the Russian military to prepare for winter combat, signaling after the talks with U.S. officials that he is not budging from his hard-line demands. Mr. Trump’s special envoy, Steve Witkoff, has since held a series of discussions in Miami with Ukraine’s delegation — with another expected to take place on Saturday — that both sides called “constructive.”

As these statements were being released, Russia unleashed more than 650 drones and 51 missiles on towns and cities across Ukraine in an assault that began overnight on Friday and stretched through Saturday morning, Ukrainian officials said.

In recent weeks, Russian forces have advanced on several fronts. They are on the brink of capturing Pokrovsk, a onetime logistics hub in the eastern region of Donetsk, and have nearly encircled its neighbor, Myrnohrad. They are moving quicker in the southern region of Zaporizhzhia. They are pressing closer to the northeastern city of Kupiansk, and they are making gains around the eastern city of Siversk, according to battlefield maps, analysts and soldiers.

The advances have been slow and costly, in both lives and equipment. Ukrainian officials and analysts say Mr. Putin could still be years away from achieving his territorial goals. Chief among them is capturing the rest of the Donetsk region, which would give Russia all of the broader eastern Ukrainian area known as the Donbas.

But Russia’s pace is quickening, and incremental moves have started to add up. Moscow’s forces captured 505 square kilometers, or nearly 200 square miles, of territory in November, up from 267 square kilometers, or about 100 square miles, in October, according to the battlefield map maintained by DeepState, a Ukrainian group with ties to the military.

“The future looks really, really grim for Ukraine,” said Mr. Kastehelmi, the analyst. “I don’t see a clear path out.”

On Monday, Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, is expected to meet in London with Prime Minister Keir Starmer of Britain, President Emanuel Macron of France and Chancellor Friedrich Merz of Germany, “to take stock of the situation and the ongoing negotiations within the framework of the U.S. mediation,” Mr. Macron wrote on social media.

“We must continue to exert pressure on Russia to compel it to choose peace,” he wrote.

For now, Ukraine appears to have enough resources to keep the front line from collapsing. But it is bending. Mr. Putin has suggested that Ukraine, facing manpower shortages and uncertainty about Western aid, should concede to his demands before the war gets even worse.

The Russian leader, in an interview with an Indian news outlet that was published on Thursday, said Russia would take additional territory in Donetsk by whatever means necessary.

The Kremlin’s summer offensive, which was aimed at capturing all of Donetsk, produced limited gains. But starting in the fall, the tide there started to turn in Russia’s favor. After months of bombarding Pokrovsk with artillery, drones and glide bombs, Russian forces punched through a string of villages and settlements to fight their way into the city.

“Things started to fall apart a bit on our side” starting in September, said Ihor, a Ukrainian drone pilot in the area who gave only his first name, according to military protocol. “The line just began collapsing from exhaustion.”

Russian forces are sending fixed-wing Molniya drones and waves of mini kamikaze drones that carry explosives, he said, adding that Ukraine had nothing comparable in mass production.

The current push for a peace plan is “all bluff,” he said, adding that as long as the Russians have “the ability to press us, they will keep pressing.”

At the same time, Russian forces have taken aim at other critical cities in Donetsk, including Kostiantynivka and Lyman.

Oleh Voitsekhovskyi, a Ukrainian captain whose unit is near Lyman, said Russian forces were attacking “all the time” and “along all directions.”

Drone strikes, shelling — it never stops, he said. “In the last two months,” he added, “you can feel an increase in the intensity of hostilities.”

Russian forces move in small groups, he said, as Ukrainian drones keep watch overhead. Heavy fog has made it harder for the drones to fend off the Russians.

Russia’s push toward Kostiantynivka, though, has so far failed to yield much in the way of territorial gains, the DeepState map shows. The same can be said for Lyman.

That has put more emphasis and urgency on Pokrovsk.

A thick fog descends there every day, accompanying “the smell of burned coal and the smell of gunpowder that has a hint of manganese, like at a firing range,” said Maksym Bakulin, who is with the 14th Operational Brigade of the National Guard.

While the city was “alive” a year ago, he added, Pokrovsk’s once bustling streets now have “civilian bodies and military bodies mixed together, with no possibility to retrieve them.”

Russian forces see Pokrovsk as a steppingstone toward Sloviansk and Kramatorsk, two heavily fortified cities in Donetsk that Ukraine still controls.

Some analysts have questioned Ukraine’s decision to keep fighting in Pokrovsk and incur heavy losses there. Analysts and some Ukrainian soldiers have said Kyiv may be trying to hold on to avoid feeding Russia’s narrative of inevitable victory as peace talks heat up. Staying in Pokrovsk could also increase Russian forces’ losses.

As Ukraine concentrated so many resources on that battle, analysts say, Russian forces spotted an opportunity elsewhere on the 75-mile-long front line, in the southeastern Zaporizhzhia region.

Russian forces made a relatively quick march there in recent weeks, seizing about 75 square miles around the city of Huliaipole in November, nearly 40 percent of Moscow’s total territorial gains last month, according to DeepState.

Ukraine has sent some reserves to the area, which has helped slow the advance, “but still the pace there is relatively alarming,” said Mr. Kastehelmi, the analyst.

The onset of winter could reduce the pace of Russia’s advances along the broader front, and also Ukrainian movements. The preponderance of drones is slowing things down even further, forcing a shift away from infantry-heavy attacks. Because of the drones, the front line is less of a line and more of a patch of land, what soldiers call a “kill zone,” up to 15 miles wide in places.

But Russia has a seemingly endless spigot of soldiers and a willingness to absorb heavy losses in a style of warfare that has been likened to a meat grinder.

“Russia has committed itself to a war of attrition, and they are currently trying to militarily break Ukraine, slowly,” Mr. Kastehelmi said.

As the 18-month battle for Pokrovsk seemingly enters its final stages, fears have risen for the neighboring city of Myrnohrad.

Russia is storming Ukrainian positions there daily, said Oleh, a sergeant platoon commander in the area who also would give only his first name per military protocol. Drones have turned the roads in and out into death traps.

“Neither by day nor by night do they give us peace,” Oleh said.

He marveled at Russia’s resources, including night vision, resupply aircraft and soldiers.

“If we have three people, they have 30,” he said. “How much manpower they have is just unreal.”

“But,” he added, “they also did not expect that we would fight for so long.”

Russian forces have advanced on several fronts recently. President Vladimir V. Putin signaled after talks with U.S. officials that he was not budging from demands.

Vladimir Putin has told the Indian prime minister, Narendra Modi, that Russia is ready to continue “uninterrupted” shipm...
12/06/2025

Vladimir Putin has told the Indian prime minister, Narendra Modi, that Russia is ready to continue “uninterrupted” shipments of oil to India, signalling a defiant stance to the US as the two leaders met in Delhi and affirmed that their ties were “resilient to external pressure”.

Narendra Modi says energy security is ‘pillar of the India-Russia partnership’ as two leaders meet in Delhi

Venezuela’s dictator, Nicolás Maduro, says the real motive behind the massive US military buildup in the Caribbean is oi...
12/06/2025

Venezuela’s dictator, Nicolás Maduro, says the real motive behind the massive US military buildup in the Caribbean is oil: his country has the largest proven reserves in the world.

The US state department denies this, insisting that the airstrikes on boats that have killed more than 80 people and the vast military deployment off South America are part of a campaign against drug trafficking.

Either way, Donald Trump seems bent on regime change in Venezuela – a country whose main allies are China, Russia and Iran, and one that has endured a deep economic collapse that triggered the region’s largest migration crisis.

The South American country facing a huge US military buildup has almost a fifth of known global reserves

Larry Johnson:The 2025 National Security Strategy (NSS) of the United States, released by the White House on December 4,...
12/06/2025

Larry Johnson:

The 2025 National Security Strategy (NSS) of the United States, released by the White House on December 4, 2025, marks a potentially profound shift in US foreign policy under President Donald Trump’s second administration as compared to his first term as president. This 33-page document explicitly embraces an “America First” doctrine, rejecting global hegemony and ideological crusades in favor of pragmatic, transactional realism focused on protecting core national interests: homeland security, economic prosperity, and regional dominance in the Western Hemisphere.

It critiques past US overreach as a failure that weakened America, positioning Trump’s approach as a “necessary correction” to usher in a “new golden age.” The strategy prioritizes reindustrialization (aiming to grow the US economy from $30 trillion to $40 trillion by the 2030s), border security, and dealmaking over multilateralism or democracy promotion. It accepts a multipolar world, downgrading China from a “pacing threat” to an “economic competitor” and calling for selective engagement with adversaries.

The Trump Administration’s New US National Security Strategy Signals a Divorce from NATO Over Ukraine 5 December 2025 by Larry C. Johnson 191 Comments Zelenskyy-EU-NATO-Group-1 It is one thing to produce a written national security strategy, but the real test is whether or not Donald Trump is seri...

The term ceasefire ‘risks creating a dangerous illusion life is returning to normal’ for Palestinians squeezed into the ...
12/06/2025

The term ceasefire ‘risks creating a dangerous illusion life is returning to normal’ for Palestinians squeezed into the remaining 42% of their land behind Israel’s ‘yellow line’

The term ceasefire ‘risks creating a dangerous illusion life is returning to normal’ for Palestinians squeezed into the remaining 42% of their land behind Israel’s ‘yellow line’

Professor Glenn Diesen on the Judging Freedom podcast
12/05/2025

Professor Glenn Diesen on the Judging Freedom podcast

Prof. Glenn Diesen : Will Europe Challenge Putin?

Trump’s New National-Security Strategy Takes Aim at EuropePresident Trump has issued a new national-security strategy th...
12/05/2025

Trump’s New National-Security Strategy Takes Aim at Europe

President Trump has issued a new national-security strategy that sharply criticizes the “unrealistic expectations” of European leaders for settling the war in Ukraine and calls for an end to NATO expansion.

The long-awaited document sets out the core principles of Trump’s “America First” foreign policy, underscoring its priorities of addressing dangers in the Western Hemisphere, including the use of “lethal force” to stop drug cartels, and competing economically with China.

The document underscores the growing rifts between the U.S. and Europe. It fuses the criticism by top Trump administration officials of Europe’s domestic policies with Washington’s peace push in Ukraine, which many European leaders fear will come at Kyiv’s expense.

Trump’s new strategy document, which was issued late Thursday, says the U.S. “finds itself at odds with European officials who hold unrealistic expectations for the war perched in unstable minority governments, many of which trample on basic principles of democracy to suppress opposition.”

In recent days, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and other European leaders have urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky not to yield to Russia’s demand without obtaining firm security commitments from the U.S.

European and Ukrainian officials have repeatedly pushed back since the summer on some of the Trump administration’s ideas for ending the war, which in an initial 28-point plan included core Russian demands, such as barring the deployment of a European peacekeeping forces, capping the size of the Ukrainian military and handing over territory in eastern Ukraine that the Russian military hasn’t occupied.

They are now pressing the U.S. to say what its role will be in safeguarding Ukraine from a future Russian attack, arguing that is critical to what they can offer to Kyiv in terms of security guarantees. That will also be key to persuading Kyiv to make compromises, they say.

Trump’s strategy also takes aim at the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s policy of keeping its doors open for the potential admission of new members. A Trump administration priority, it states, is “ending the perception, and preventing the reality, of NATO as a perpetually expanding alliance.” The strategy says Europe needs to “take primary responsibility for its own defense.”

That contrasts sharply with the foreign policy of a previous Republican president, George W. Bush, who sought to put Ukraine on a firm path to inclusion in the alliance at the 2008 NATO summit in Bucharest.

The criticism of Europe in Trump’s new strategy document also contrasts with the 2017 national-security strategy that Trump issued during his first term in an administration that included principals like adviser H.R. McMaster, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and Central Intelligence Agency Director and later Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.

That 2017 strategy emphasized the need of the U.S. and Europe to work together to “counter Russian subversion and aggression” and dubbed Moscow a “revisionist” power that along with Beijing was determined to “shape a world antithetical to U.S. values and interests.”

It is also starkly different from the strategy issued by the Biden administration in 2022, which portrayed the world situation as a competition between U.S.-led democracies and autocracies and stressed the need to push back against Moscow’s “imperialist foreign policy.”

In contrast, Trump’s new document stresses the need to “reestablish strategic stability” with Russia and casts Washington as a potential moderating force between Moscow and a Europe that is anxious about the Kremlin’s objectives.

The description of Europe in Trump’s new strategy document echoes Vice President JD Vance’s February speech in Europe in which he charged that its leaders were curtailing free speech and urged European governments not to try to block hard right parties from power. The Trump strategy document says Europe faces “civilizational erasure” because of its failure to check illegal migration.

“A large European majority wants peace, yet that desire is not translated into policy, in large measure because of those governments’ subversion of democratic processes,” Trump’s strategy document states. “This is strategically important to the United States precisely because European states cannot reform themselves if they are trapped in political crisis.”

Some former U.S. officials were sharply critical.

“This administration wants results from allies without providing consistent leadership. Moscow will exploit any gap between American words and European capabilities,” said Jacqueline Ramos, who served as the deputy assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs during the Biden administration. “If credibility erodes in Europe, it erodes everywhere and adversaries will take note.”

Trump’s new strategy will be followed by the Pentagon’s National Defense Strategy. It is expected to be unveiled soon by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and will outline more details about U.S. military goals and programs.

Even so, Trump’s new strategy document underscores some of the top goals of the forthcoming Pentagon strategy. The document calls adjusting the U.S. global military posture so the U.S. can put more focus on the Western Hemisphere.

“The United States will reassert and enforce the Monroe Doctrine to restore American preeminence in the Western Hemisphere,” states the strategy document. “Targeted deployments to secure the border and defeat cartels, including where necessary the use of lethal force to replace the failed law enforcement-only strategy of the last several decades,” will also be pursued, it says.

It also stresses the need to “harden and strengthen” military capabilities in the Western Pacific to deter potential Chinese aggression.

The strategy says that the U.S. will seek to deny aggression anywhere in the First Island Chain, a string of territory from the Japanese archipelago through Taiwan and the Philippines to the South China Sea.

“America’s diplomatic efforts should focus on pressing our First Island Chain allies and partners to allow the U.S. military greater access to their ports and other facilities, to spend more on their own defense, and most importantly to invest in capabilities aimed at deterring aggression,” it stated.

“This will interlink maritime security issues along the First Island Chain while reinforcing U.S. and allies’ capacity to deny any attempt to seize Taiwan or achieve a balance of forces so unfavorable to us as to make defending that island impossible.”

In contrast with the Pacific, the document says the Middle East has receded as a central focus for U.S. foreign policy as the U.S. steps up its energy production. “The days in which the Middle East dominated foreign policy in both long-term planning and day-to-day ex*****on are thankfully over,” it states.

The optimistic sentiment comes as Washington and its partners are still struggling to organize and deploy an international stabilization force to establish order in Gaza and amid uncertainty over the status of Iran’s nuclear program after the U.S.’s June airstrike on its nuclear complex.

https://www.wsj.com/politics/national-security/trumps-new-national-security-strategy-takes-aim-at-europe-22f03581?

The document calls for an end to NATO expansion and chastises Europe over “unrealistic expectations” for how to end the war in Ukraine.

Address

Boston, MA

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Foreign Policy Observer posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share