11/02/2023
By Hon Charles Tebandeke Baale Constituency
According to my petition,court is supposed to declare the first bill passed by parliament as on,3/5/2022 ,
Not the reconsidered bill as re-passed by parliament as on 28/9/2022, because he had already contravined with article 91 (3) over prescribed time duration for him to respond to the bill passed by parliament in 30 days,
And parliament to had already contravined with article 91 (7) for speaker to cause to lay the bill passed by parliament after president's failure to respond to the bill within 30day as prescribed by law,
So by president assenting to bill after his failure to respond to it in a prescribed manner, its description of continuous violation and irrespect to constitutionalism and rule of law hence void and null,
The copy of the reconsidered bill the fisheries and aquaculture bill president assented to also valgalises the constitution because parliament also violated it own constitutional mandet reconsider the bill which the law had already considered by president failure to act with in the legal 30day as the law describes,
The act of the president assenting to bill after his failure to respond to the bill passed by parliament with 30 constitutional days is an interpretation of the president assenting for the second time because the law considers him to have already assented and it's not in line with the law,
It's further a matter of prejudice for him to assent to the bill yet through his attorney general,he knows the fisheries and aquaculture bill matter is in COURT against president's failure to respond to the bill passed by parliament with 30 constitutional days,
This won't limit court from hearing the case against his adamant action of omission and conducts in undermining rule of law and constitutionalism and he has described him self to underlook the powers and authority of Parliament and judiciary as whole,
As in our petition we prayed court to declare the first bill passed by parliament as on 3/5/2022 and as for the president is assenting to the ILLEGAL reconsidered copy of the bill passed by parliament on 28/9/2022 after his failure to respond to the bill within the 30 constitutional days
ALL SUCH PROCEEDING RESPONSES TO THE FISHERIES AND ACQUACULTURE BILL ARE OMISSIONS,VOID AND NULL HENCE UN CALLED FOR AND NOT IN RESPECT TO RULE OF LAW AND CONSTITUTIONALISM,
Tebandeke Charles mp Bbaale constituency kayunga district, for equity and generosity !