EEI - publishing company

  • Home
  • EEI - publishing company

EEI - publishing company живём, чтобы вы жили

22/01/2022

RESETTING THE DIALECTICS

I think everyone knows about "dialectics". Why? Because in the era of universal higher education (I read somewhere that today 97% of high school graduates continue to study at universities) - ALL children are told about "philosophy": it is a "mandatory subject" of the higher education program.

Only times have changed! Changed interests and needs. Let us ask ourselves – what were those times when many people needed “universal” “same” “universal” knowledge? Am I seriously mistaken in assuming that such knowledge was needed in the industrial world, the world of Europe. Where “capitalism”, “industrial production” arose and developed, where, next, national states arose - as such formats for bringing people together, when collective common national goals were possible and arose: innovations arose in temporal marketing and temporal navigation. Temporal navigation? Temporal marketing? This is when small "communities" of people who settled on a certain (with an accessible perimeter, border) territory - suddenly began to cross such borders and unite into nation-states - with the same legislation, practices and protection from "strangers". So - from a completely practical plane, it's time to answer the question - what is "common" between "us"? And who are the “strangers”, who are the “enemies”? I am now acting as a "materialist" - trying to find some vital, living basis for various "theoretical" considerations. It is clear that a "philosopher" is such a special "person at court" who can try to answer questions. Commoners do not need to understand anything at all. The less they understand, the easier it is for them to tell that the time has come to “give up their lives” “for the Motherland” and, of course, to endure their poverty - since ALL the resources of the “country” are directed to the cause of the Great Victory. Enemies, common enemies and common goals, agreements, negotiations and victories - these are just a small range of issues that interested many rulers in Europe.

It is clear that responses have slowly emerged. There was some competition in philosophy. The philosopher who gave the most original answer to THESE questions provided the Sovereign with the tools to defeat those who risked remaining “abroad” of power with “standard thinking”. If someone wants to, he can see what kind of TOPICS at that time in Europe occupied those who ruled and those who “delivered to the court” “philosophy”. Menu "philosophy" - probably can be seen in the Hegelian philosophy. Each book is, after all, a response to the “request” of the court and the “public”! He has no "questions of ecology" or "theories of peaceful coexistence", "convergence" or "questions of democracy". Industrial production, capitalism - gave rise to "categories" and "universal laws of development": dialectics.

What is "dialectics" in a simple, school, lapidary abstract?

These are a few statements, replicas, theories about - HOW does the WHOLE WORLD work as a whole? These are remarks about the SCIENCE of LOGIC, about Phenomenology, about the State, Law, Ethics, Aesthetics, Religion, History. And everywhere - the very "maxims" of dialectics are squeezed in.

1. Who are the "enemies"? Where are they? The answer is simple: “enemies” are the PARTIES of the contradiction, these are “opposites”. These are those who do not agree with you and are ready to kill you, poison you, put you in jail for your beliefs, thoughts, principles, conversations, position and opposition, words, theories and slogans, calls, goals, ideals and values ​​...
2. PEACE - never possible. The struggle of opposites is forever. Black fights White. Devils are with Angels. Day - with Night. Women are with Men. Truth - with a lie ... And? Etc. There is no way to evade the fight…))) Struggle: it is a duty. This is the right to heroism and death. This is a matter of honor. Although, however, sometimes - you can "pretend", to deceive the enemy. To enter into a temporary agreement, some kind of agreement - at the same time understanding that the “agreement” is a “paper for a while”.
3. If you fight correctly, endure hardships and difficulties, then, in the end, “victory will be ours!”, And the number of battles will turn into the quality of prey! The winner's resources will increase.

In other words, the European concept of dialectics is the justification and general theory of wars, victories and patience. These are replicas - as it seemed to them - for ALL times. THREE "laws of dialectics" - this is all that the Sovereign needs to know - in order to lead the people and win. One small question remained aside - about the organization of private life. What is a “little man” to do who is not going to defeat his neighbor, who does not defeat his wife, who has a short life ahead of him and wants to have time to become happy and loved? How to navigate in everyday life? In a life where there are shops, a house, a dacha, a car, Egypt, a salary, a boring TV and difficulties ... As soon as the principle ended - “we all die as one in the struggle ... for THIS” - then the dialectic immediately became doubtful.

Times change. FOUNDATIONS, the processes that people face within their lives, are changing. And questions arise - what to do? In a NEW situation? "Industrial production"? It's over. The "factories and plants" were closed. Land for peasants? Not needed, and overgrown with weeds. Mortgage and dialectics? Not related at all. Credits and controversy? They have nothing in common. Universal High School and destiny? They have nothing to do with the "universal laws of development" ... "Bright future"? It is being postponed - because the “Bright Past” has not yet been equipped. Agreements on common goals, ideals, principles, rules, orders, norms and values? No. There is not even an “analysis of the situation” - no one needs it! ...

The dialectic that was born in Europe in the house of the "Germans" - here again, in Russia - has no chance! More precisely: there are chances - but only if the "bright Past" - will last until the Last Judgment. "Our" current slogan is forward to the Apocalypse! I don't have statistics, they bashfully keep silent about it. Everything. Both Adepts and Opponents. How many industrial enterprises in THIS city of a million people have closed (bankrupt) in the last 20 years? The bankruptcy of the K**a industry is a consequence of whose actions? Whose strategy is this? External observation (mine) tells me that out of every TEN enterprises - ONE remains afloat. So the "industrial base" for the existence of "topical issues of dialectics" - died, ended, died. And here is where things get interesting! In particular, what happens after the death of the "basis", the realities of real life... There, in Europe, the demand for "dialectics" was provided by competition, wars and temporary peaces between competitors. But! Dialectics was born, not DEAD!

And here, with us, in Russia, the "industry" - the basis for the "dialectical understanding of history and reality" - is dead! And what kind of songs are needed at the funeral? In what pit should the co**se of dialectics be buried? The modest consideration that it - NULLED - does not free us from the disgusting smell: the dialectic, having zeroed out, stinks! After the funeral of someone close - you have to "rebuild" the world. Or move to another, different, not this one. It also seems ... some navigational aids are needed ... (((

I have, of course, a couple of comrades who hope to "reanimate" "industrial production." They say - let's buy new machines, train new personnel - and: we'll live! Let's get rich and successful! My friends don't understand that the "industrial world" is over. They have already missed. Because you have to change your mind. Return to your roots and step by step to part with the rubbish. Received as part of the "best in the world" "Soviet education"!

Not about the "industrial world" is worth thinking about. Don't revive him. Capitalism, industrial civilization: ended. "Classes"? Run out. "Class struggle"? Too. Many times in my life I came across people who were dissatisfied with existence. My question is what are you ready to do? Something that would make you different from others? I received stories about who is to blame for the fact that THIS person does not know how to be the author of his life. The author of his own destiny. Computers have freed many from their "attachment" to monotonous operations "near their workplace." I am talking about the workplace insofar as the "school board", education is industrial education. This is the production of "identical people" according to "identical programs". So - the funeral of industrial society, the funeral of dialectics, the nullification of dialectics - nobody needs it - in our great march into the Past: they create a challenge. The challenge is not to the Sovereign. And "philosophers". Who is ready to risk his head and say: “Sire! You missed! AFTER the dialectic, ANOTHER dialectic arises: post-dialectics, meta-dialectics – and not the theory of Armageddon!”

The nullification of THIS dialectic, in which there is always war - even when there is peace - as everyone is preparing for the next war, leads to a dialectic of accords, agreements, cooperation in this wonderful full world. There are no contradictions in the Fullness. There is the unity of the Fullness, its indivisibility. There - happiness, delight, surprise, joy, pleasure, children. Not: funerals and mourning. Fullness has no boundaries. TAM - other laws apply. Life there is different.

Another question is how to navigate the Portals. Where is the key? And in which direction does the door creak as it opens? And who is working as Peter today? Whose change?

21/01/2022

ABOUT ZEROING THE METHODOLOGY

What do we know about METHOD? First, it's a series. Television. Secondly, this series is temporal. Thirdly, THIS can be used - doing something. However, it is also possible to talk about the Method - as did, for example, DECARTES. So that:
- first something is and happens,
- then - IT - becomes "visible" or "intelligible" - separated from everything else, for example, "drawn on the sand" (board),
- then - tools and a way to study this - separated (we understand that "tools" - will also have to be made, adapted to the study process ("telescope" - for example, does not exist in nature - it will have to be made and, consequently, create another whole many technologies...
- further - the Method is described - as an instruction: point by point ...,
- and, finally, the text About the Method appears: it contains all the iterations, all the difficulties, all the pitfalls and whirlpools are exposed, scary traps are marked with flags ... traps that you can easily fall into - if you do not try to bypass them ...
This is how the "methodology" was born. We already have FIVE notes here that can easily become and turn into CHAPTERS (or sections) of a long text…

It's time to be clear. Today, probably, few people know about this (about the method). The school spends a lot of the life time of children - who are imprisoned for 11 years - in order to push into the children's heads a lot of information that is identified as "knowledge" and divided-distributed as "objects". What skills, for example, can we talk about - that they are assigned in the current school? Stadium? Computer class? Slate? Kitchen? And in life? How many skills do you need to live a happy life? How many skills does it take to be loved? And for wealth: how much? What is the relationship, for example, between geometry and a political career? Or between love and sinuses? What grades did President Putin have in physics? Why in physics and what does this subject have to do with it? Well, for example, physics is a science in which respect for the LAWS is instilled. Mathematics? It is necessary for children to respect numbers and ANSWERS. Biology? It is clear - for "humor jokes" about s*x and love ...))) Each "subject" of the school curriculum has its real purpose! Secret! History textbooks - as I remember - are such drawing aids. Usikov on the characters. This tutorial teaches you how to find reasons to laugh and smile in the most boring place. So the "method" - falls into the field of human attention relatively late. One can even notice that the person who can say a few sentences to the question “about the method” belongs to the Russian elite. Or: has incredible potential for a political career.

Why do I need this my indiscreet mark about the method? Let me explain: just to point out that "education" - ignores this topic. There are stories about Descartes' methods. Leibniz, Einstein, Galileo, Fermi and all sorts of other characters, there are "quests", there are computer games, there are wins (losses) - only "methodologies": no! There are complex devices with instructions for them, but the user does not care at all - who, how and when made his gadget ?! The one who got behind the wheel of a car should not know anything about "internal combustion".

My father-in-law had a car. In TE, Soviet times. Immodest. VOLGA GAZ-21. Father-in-law worked at a "chemical plant" and now: he was lucky. True, the whole family then all their lives - paid for the "loan": but that's another topic. Of course, it was great when I came to them (my father-in-law with my mother-in-law) in the Crimea to get into a car and explore the secret places of our Crimea ...))) And my father-in-law often asked me - why don't you get yourself a car? And I refused as much as I could. Like - Soviet fun with a "car" - this is a garage, SaturdaySunday joy: s*x while servicing your car; this is a garage brotherhood-drunkenness, it is ... in short, a hassle! I do not want! However, new times came and one day I was paid a fee for my exercises. Such that I could afford to buy a car. Yes, at the same time. And a dacha - so that there is something to carry sheep and strawberries, fishing rods and tomato seedlings ...))) And now - attention - a question !!! What did I miss? ... (yes, at that very happy moment in my father-in-law's life: after all, he finally waited for us to have a topic for leisurely conversations there, in the Crimea) ... That's right: a driver's license. And I went to study. It was then that I discovered that I was outdated! The teacher told us for our money - about the "Rules of the road"! I diligently followed the ups and downs - which awaited me on the roads. He took pity on his father-in-law. I was worried about my worthless fate: instead of philosophy - this is THIS, this is WHAT should be studied! When, before the end of my training procedure, there were THREE classes left, and I still didn’t hear anything about the “car device”: I became sad. And, feeling sad, he dared to ask a question to our Teacher: “And when will we begin to study the“ device of a car ”?! He shocked me with his straightforward army answer (the man was a military pensioner): NEVER!

And I ... felt sad ... (((In vain. Although, in that first year of my automobile happiness, I drove my first AUDI - to the Crimea. And when I returned - it was just that, the first "default". And the specialists in counter A .Chertkov to my question about why the engine is knocking like that? - they advised me to simply “top up the oil”!

Can you imagine my hatred for the "car teacher" for not bothering to tell me for my money - WHERE to add "oil" when you hear a suspicious knock?! And now, imagine, during the default - I'm standing in the store, and on the shelves - a lot of cans of "oil". And I: I don't know - WHICH one of them is MINE!? It's good that the seller - during my amazement - managed to change the prices twice! It was difficult for us “with him” to find out what kind of “oil” I need ?! Do you think that's all?! The happy owner of the container (that's me) is approaching his car. And here comes the second act of the ballet! It is necessary to understand - IN WHAT PLACE IS IT poured ???! What have been subdued? Are you laughing?! And I silently walked around my car and looked for a "hole"! A compassionate woman approached me. Says, "What's my dear, saddened?" And I? I honestly answer - yes, the oil needs to be “filled in” somewhere! You can't imagine the sparkle in her wide eyes!!! She helped me open the hood…))) She says: well, pour it!... And I, in suffering and hatred for our “colonel”, almost sobbing, ask: “WHERE???!” The kind fairy woman showed me where and even turned the lid off, because there was no hole in the lid! Fairy - showed me - where is the PIECE! It’s clear, I thought - if it’s a probe, then it’s supposed to be probed! And later I found out myself - to what division you need to pour from the bottle, what is the norm ... and all the accompanying circumstances ... About the fact that there are different brands of the same product. But not so. That THIS is oil, let's say, for one, and the other for another! ... And now, attention, the question is: what was so difficult for my “teacher” to tell me about the “signs” of trouble and about “consumables”? well, so that I don’t have saddles and my hair doesn’t stand up ... It didn’t cost anything. I would: carefully wrote everything down. This would have saved me many minutes for a quiet life ... But there are also pads. And the "secret" ... And many other unknown things - about rubber, diameters and Nokia. THIS is how I guessed that there are times when "exploitation" is separated from "manufacturing". Preparation from consumption. I realized that the world has entered an era of new surprise, a new world of gadgets - without methods. So the Method - crumbled, and the "methodology" - ceased.

After all, the matter also concerns the existence of "universal methods". Remember - how in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, various specialists in mathematics and philosophy were shocked by this. which turned out to be. that "mathematics" is not a "rigorous science" at all!?... Don't you remember? Let me remind you: the case concerned the theory of sets and, the foundations of mathematics and the paradoxes of mathematics. Who wants:google. Will you object? Well, take a chance, without someone else's help, to define the UNIT ... (((For a long time, philosophy was such a ... chicken coop. For the "sciences." All sciences sat on poles inside philosophy. Philosophy was such a household shed! And then, a little later - when the smart people managed to find out that God did not just create EVERYTHING, but also so that people would enjoy the beauty of the world in its knowledge. purpose .... And: any such other. High. And: low. It is no coincidence that Aristotle (long ago ...) talked about metaphysics. Although, there is an assumption that those who rewrote these texts - simply - called the book that way, since it already stood on the shelf - AFTER "Physics". For those who are not in the know: there was no printing yet, they had not been invented. And since in Metaphysics the old man talked about EVERYTHING - as he pleases - then this way of "reasoning about everything" THEN was called one of the methods.Is it clear?If You run the risk of chatting incoherently about whatever you want - then you: exactly = METAPHYSICIST! The main thing is that you yourself should feel that you are terribly logical and consistent. And all this is important! They - these guys who talk about "Important" often still like to take some piece of the world, tear it off - from everything else and ... - well, crumble it into pieces! This skill is called "analysis". Only, of course - already much later than the old man Aristotle. Aristotle did not have tool gadgets. Unless - his head ... So: it was difficult for him. He proved everything with speech, conversation, logic and hands. Ancient Greek thinkers - must have had strong fists. Well, and, probably, also a helmet with a shield in the pantry. Head: keep.

Is it clear that "universal methods" were produced, prepared and developed inside - in the kitchen, in olive groves, at symposiums (where it was supposed to drink hard, eat watermelons, fish, touch slaves - for all sorts of soft places) on nudist beaches, near temples… The world was not yet ONE! And the question of a "single method" was not important. The worship of Venus was different from the worship of Zeus, and Zeus was stronger than other small gods-heroes. The adventures of each were not like the lives of others. Therefore, all the stories about the private private life of the gods were full of special details. Not similar to the circumstances of the life of other gods. After all, Love is not like Trade. Boys to girls. Athens on Syracuse. Sea to mountains. Greek life is all about variety and different pleasures. There are still no requirements - to swear allegiance to "United Greece"! And there is no united Greece.

I am not a supporter of "formations". They don't exist in my life. I am prepared for the fact that people understand the world differently, that among them there are fools and smart people living by their own laws. Moreover, there are different "circles of fools" and "society of smart." Club life there: clubbing! Only here is ONE approaching: ONE God, ONE country, One language, ONE logic, ONE world, ONE death, ONE love, ONE war… This “loneliness” thing is connected with the birth of ONE God! A multitude becomes a multitude of miracles, gifts, mysteries and sacraments, testimonies, gospels, etc. The world is built hierarchically: like a Church, like a Temple. BELIEF is something complicated. This is not a joke to you. For faith - went to the stake. They did feats. They gave their lives. THEY knew that there was a GOD and that he was with Them!

It took a lot of time - in order for knowledge to appear from within faith. Sciences. Research. Capitalism is no joke! This is the lifestyle of many people. Each of them has always had its own interest. Respected by others. There were rules. Norms. The laws. Punishments. Codes. Executions. Fortresses. It is clear that there was also a need to use the SAME rules. Like this? Well, for understanding, rubles are exchanged for dollars in Moscow, Perm or Ryazan according to the same rules. A stamp in your passport stating that you are married: the same everywhere. Rubles in Perm and rubles in Moscow: the same. Objects, means, tools: different. But the rules and methods are the same!...)))
This is the fact that the objects are different, but the methods are similar: it created confidence that it is possible to build ONE MEGA theory about WAYS! The Soviet nerds liked the story about "dialectics". What is it about? About simple. About the fact that there are sides always and everywhere. The parties can become "opposites" and begin to "fight". This "struggle" is what "dialectics" is! It has its own "laws". Nobody can avoid it. Then came stories about classes and about the victory of the workers, about communism and enemies... A class of privileged new "priests" - "philosophers" arose. A horde of philosophers was needed so that everyone believed, so that all this (about opposites, enemies and victory) was considered faith. Cornerstone. And - it is clear: again - "all as one! ..."

For a long time, all sciences were kept separately in their “subject areas”. However, the moment has come when computers and social networks have come to THIS world. Libraries have become "electronic". Texts - reachable from any part of the world. Communication is always relevant when there is a desire. Communications: regular. Mira - crumbled into many specific details. And it turned out that you can live your whole life - never thinking about its meaning and the world "in general". Everything I need to know, he will tell me. For instance? On TV. PARTY: will decide - because it is smarter ...

The end of socialism also marked a line in attempts to preserve one doctrine of method, one methodology for many. But private life does not require the same solutions! Capitalism - expects from you initiative and authorship, action - unlike the actions of the rest! Capital is waiting for you to privatize your destiny and your life. AGREEMENTS? Only possible when you have appropriated yourself! He came to himself - he appeared to himself!

Means? So, you have to talk to everyone. Separately. Give him reasons: to disagree with you. provoke him. Invite you to make your choice. Make YOUR decision. Create your existential strategy. Anthropic capital - does not arise as a result of "methodology", but - contrary to it! Methodology: is not PASSIVE!

And, therefore, it IS RESET to ZERO at the moment when you assign YOURSELF!

20/01/2022

GNOSEOLOGY IN THE STYLE OF ZERO

So, for the sake of order - “epistemology” is about how people know how, can and want to learn something, know, understand, answer questions and discuss various ignorance. I would say that this is like teaching how to deal with the emptiness in the head. The strange thing is that no one ever questioned this need, this greed, this goal in my presence. Like: teaching is light, but ignorance? Dark! No one ever doubted anywhere that "it's time to learn." In all government places, there was a truism and a poster hung - about “study-study-and-study-again” ... To study in order to forget about happiness? Or - to learn "not to ask stupid questions"? For example, about where are we all headed today? Because - and if I'm not on the way? Whose head will have to change? mine? Not mine?

Here, Peter - like me: all his life he taught students mathematics, design quirks with sets, algebras, geometries ... (((And now? He talks to cats. And cats hear him, understand, love him. Almost like me. I am smart - I spent my life on love. More precisely, on what I came up with for myself about love. My “identity” broke down, but I didn’t notice! There was a couple of cats - and my son put them to sleep. He found an excuse and put them to sleep. me - for something ... (((And Peter: no one takes revenge. And pensions - to feed the cats: enough - glory to the great Russian state! It turned out that the "methodology" is worse than cats: it is not affectionate. And here I have - instead of "methodology" - an evil "philosophy": it does not console. Go, he says, to the end! ... (((Reset to zero!

When I was young - for me it was not doubtful what professors, associate professors, assistants at my university told me about the internal harmony of philosophy. In which there is ontology, epistemology and various departments. Including the department of "dialectics". After all, I came to my faculty to study philosophy in a real way! What doubts can there be about the structure and departments?

Cheerful Vera Yakovlevna Komarova gave us a course on the history of ancient philosophy with ardor. And I ran away from Pythagoras, Plato, Aristotle and Socrates. I didn't have time to think about anything else. I was shocked by the content and poetics of these texts. In which the men quite seriously argued and talked about objects that were not around! It was a real escape from reality. It was knowledge - seasoned with some kind of "dissent"! It was so joyful and exciting to learn something that had nothing to do with Nevsky Prospekt, the Hermitage, the Moika, Perm, Pulkovo, worms, wolves and flies, Riga, the USA, communism, the Politburo and five-year plans ... I don’t know, will you understand? In those times, there were, as it were, several “rivers” that flowed and headed in different directions. "Streams of knowledge" - were not connected in any way with shop windows, prices, TV, weather and members of the Politburo. The streams did not merge, did not mix - each was on its own. After all, it's true - how are some Nicholas of Cusa and dialectical materialism related to each other? Or set theory and Rosenthal with arguments about a “bright future” without classes. TA study gave rise to horror in me: do I really have to read all the books that have accumulated in this majestic building of the Library of the Academy of Sciences?! Otherwise? Will I not know something? And I will become defective?... Do you remember what we were all trained for a third of our lives? To KNOW means to “learn a lesson”, to do your homework. AND? ANSWER. That is? To retell what happened to remember, to comprehend ... No one has ever taught anyone qualitatively NOT TO KNOW! I: DON'T UNDERSTAND...

Therefore, “study” was presented as a continuous stream of increasing the number of books read, lectures listened to, exams passed, seminars passed ... It is clear that the brain: exploded! Since the main task seemed to be the task of recording and storing, tidying up the book-text-store. THERE: sacred knowledge was kept. Ignorance, ZERO - was despised. Deviant, defective knowledge, corrupted knowledge turned out to be shameful. About him - it was impossible to report and admit. Tell me sincerely: I DON'T KNOW! And you become a laughing stock. Everyone will advise something like that, from the shelves with books. And the trolleybus goes along Nevsky - without this dust. Life and books from BAN: not connected, not connected: I exist independently, separately - in different realities. Plato - did not wear jeans. And Socrates: didn't use condoms.

I spent another 10 years moving towards understanding that "philosophy" is completely separate from "life". Of course, I could read various fascinating lectures, for example, in the GUFSIN ...))) About that - how bad it is: to watch American cinema! I just think these people looked at me with some bewilderment. After all, they knew a completely different life. And, I think, they were terribly surprised at what kind of nonsense I carried with such rapture and for so long! The cells in the pre-trial detention center were incomprehensible to me. They do not understand the words that I could pronounce. But we - from both sides - had to meet: this was required by the protocols of Soviet life. They didn't know what I knew. I didn't know what they knew. And that's precisely why: all of us - lost relative
Know everything at all? What for? If you have to know how to love today? How to repay tomorrow? How to choose your goals this week - for the rest of your life? Where to get money yesterday? How not to miss the milestone, how not to turn in the wrong direction - at the cornerstone? Today, in my seventies, I am pleased that I have always chosen pleasure over work. Only now - traveling for the joy in my life, for freedom and pleasure: I missed. I kept taking the wrong turn - that's why I'm ZERO today! Epistemology in the style of "zero" - gives rise to the result: existential bankruptcy. When all my friends are celebrating the victory, enjoying food, children, grandchildren, honor and respect - I am sitting in the last row - because no one called me. How to call Nobody for a holiday? How to see Nobody? Epistemology in the style of Zero - turns you into Zero, first of all, yourself. At this moment, insight and self-determination come, and emotional intelligence wins over memory. Epistemology in the style of Zero is not about the fact that THERE is nothing to know, not about contempt for “knowledge”, not about selection or order on the shelf where the first book is located next to the wall: and to the left of it there is nothing else. It's about being yourself: ZERO on a stick. You have nothing and no reason to "know". You can't, don't want to, and shouldn't waste time on THIS. You don't have the means to do it. Where did you get the idea that you have "tools"? With what fright do you talk so importantly about "methods"? If today you have received pleasure and tomorrow you will repeat it: this will be a real deterioration of the material of pleasure. A mockery of the moment, moment, originality. I know today that I know nothing. I do not understand. And, perhaps, I do not want to understand - after all, what happened yesterday has already happened. And will never happen again. So why do I need the lessons of yesterday, the past tense. I do not want.

True, one thing is bad - Emptiness is not for sale. Just like Light or Darkness. The Black Light has no price. I don't have anything to put a price tag on. But at a time when the Black Light becomes obvious to many, when the prospects are closed to them and it is not clear how to navigate where nothing is visible - the demand for the skills of turning Black into White, the skills of manipulating navigational signs become vital. Career "in Black": is it a task or a problem? Communication in Black and about Black: is it relevant? How to organize the Black Biennale? Remember, in childhood - horror stories, in the "pioneer camp"? “And then in a black-black light, black-black night, a black-black old woman came out from around the corner of the house ... and how ... she grabs you by the throat with her twisted hand and sparkles with black-black eyes!” It makes you want to sip a glass of sherry in the morning!

Let's highlight the nodes in our journey through the white silence? Will we cope with the weight of zero and darkness? 1. It is not at all obvious that there is something “outside” that is worth spending a fraction of your time on. Instead of reading every day (BAN is big, you can't see the ends and edges), it's worth living, loving, rumbling. 2. Zero is a drug, a motive, a temptation, a bank, an intangible asset that can ruin your whole life. Is it worth worrying about an empty wallet, a light on the horizon, and stars above your head? 3. Everything that happens is done and happens because inside you, inside any of us, there is a languor of zero, there is emptiness, there is darkness, there is light that you want to give away, get rid of them: fill with something. Own zero - seduces inaction, laziness, languor and pleasure. 4. Nothing inside requires transformation. 5. No one inside - does not force you to go outside and start to "know" something. Spend your whole life on learning, and then grow gooseberries in the country - waiting for the warm earth to begin to undead and caress you in your eternity?

Every day a new Me. Without a suitcase, warehouse or barge with dusty tons of "book knowledge". The Internet, computers and Clouds - freed me: finally I - became light, became like the wind, aroma, breath, trembling. Everything you want to know for today - what is served in my Menu for today - is available: it is stored by Iron Things. And you don't have to love them at all.

For love, there are soft, affectionate warm people with moist eyes and gentle hands.

Address


Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when EEI - publishing company posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to EEI - publishing company:

Videos

Шарлипупа и как её знать
Шарлипупа и как её знать

Shortcuts

  • Address
  • Alerts
  • Contact The Business
  • Videos
  • Claim ownership or report listing

  • Want your business to be the top-listed Media Company?

Share