INDIA PAK JUNG DAILY

09/05/2025

**Pakistan Air Force's Superiority Over Indian Air Force: Key Factors Behind Recent Aerial Dominance**

The recent escalation between India and Pakistan, culminating in Pakistan’s claimed downing of multiple Indian aircraft—including the advanced **French-made Rafale**—has raised critical questions about the balance of air power in South Asia. While India possesses numerical and budgetary superiority, Pakistan’s qualitative edge in **training, technology, and strategic doctrine** has proven decisive. Below is a detailed analysis of the factors that contributed to Pakistan’s aerial dominance in recent clash1. Superior Pilot Training & Tactical Proficiency**
Pakistan’s **intensive pilot training programs** emphasize **realistic combat simulations, rapid decision-making, and air superiority tactics**, making its pilots among the most skilled in the region.
- **Joint exercises with NATO and the U.S.** (e.g., Red Flag, Green Flag) have honed PAF’s combat readiness, with Western forces ranking Pakistani pilots as "among the finest" .
- **High accident rates in the IAF** (due to outdated Soviet-era doctrines and training inefficiencies) contrast with PAF’s **low crash rates and superior maintenance culture** .
- In the **2019 Balakot skirmish**, PAF’s **F-16s** outmaneuvered Indian jets, downing a **MiG-21 Bison** and capturing its pilot—demonstrating tactical superiority despite numerical inferiority .

# # **2. Advanced Chinese-Pakistani Fighter Jets (J-10CE & JF-17 Block III)**
Pakistan’s reliance on **Chinese-made 4.5-generation fighters** has neutralized India’s Rafale advantage.
- **J-10CE**:
- Equipped with **AESA radar, PL-15 beyond-visual-range (BVR) missiles**, and superior electronic warfare systems.
- **Confirmed by U.S. officials** to have downed at least two Indian jets, including a Rafale .
- **JF-17 Thunder Block III**:
- A cost-effective, lightweight multirole fighter with **AESA radar, high off-boresight missiles, and advanced avionics**.
- **156 JF-17s** in service, making it the backbone of PAF .

**Rafale’s Weaknesses Exposed:**
- Despite being a **4.5-gen fighter**, India’s **limited fleet (only 36 Rafales)** and **lack of full Meteor missile integration** reduced its effectiveness .
- **PL-15 vs. Meteor**:
- The **Chinese PL-15 missile (used by PAF) outperformed** India’s Meteor in BVR engagements, forcing Rafales into disadvantageous positions .

3. Integrated Air Defense & Electronic Warfare Systems**
PAF’s **layered air defense network** neutralized India’s numerical advantage.
- **HQ-9/P (Chinese S-300 equivalent)** and **LY-80** SAM systems provided long-range coverage .
- **Electronic warfare superiority** disrupted Indian radar and communications, degrading IAF’s situational awareness .
- **Mobile SAM batteries** allowed rapid repositioning, making suppression difficult for Indian SEAD (Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses) missions .

4. Strategic Restraint & Full Fleet Utilization**
- **PAF deployed its entire fleet** against India, while the **IAF had to reserve jets for China**, diluting its combat power .
- **Lean, agile force structure** (387 vs. India’s 616 jets) meant PAF could **focus on quality over quantity** .
- **Pakistan’s entire military doctrine** is built around **asymmetric warfare**, ensuring maximum efficiency with minimal resources .

# # **5. Psychological & Morale Factors**
- **PAF’s high morale** (rooted in Islamic nationalism and combat experience) contrasts with **IAF’s internal issues** (caste/religious divisions, high su***de rates) .
- **Swift Retort (2019) and recent clashes** reinforced PAF’s reputation for **precision strikes and rapid retaliation**, demoralizing Indian pilots .

---

# # # **Conclusion: A Shift in South Asian Air Power Dynamics**
While India **spends far more on defense**, Pakistan’s **superior training, Chinese technology, and integrated air defense** have allowed it to **punch above its weight**. The **downing of Rafales by J-10CEs** marks a **strategic milestone**, proving that **quality, not just quantity, dictates air combat outcomes**.

**India’s key weaknesses:**
Over-reliance on **imported systems** with poor interoperability.
**Bureaucratic procurement delays** (e.g., Tejas delays, Rafale fleet limitations).
**Lack of real combat experience** compared to PAF’s battle-hardened pilots.

**Pakistan’s strengths:**
Elite pilot training & NATO-standard tactics**.
Chinese 4.5-gen jets (J-10CE, JF-17) with superior BVR missilesIntegrated air defense & electronic warfare dominance**.

**Future Implications:**
- **China’s role as Pakistan’s arms supplier** will grow, further tilting the balance.
- **India must accelerate indigenous fighter programs** (e.g., AMCA) to counter PAF’s qualitative edge.

For now, **Pakistan’s air force remains the dominant force in South Asian skies*u*—proving that **strategy and skill can overcome raw numbers

12/06/2023

Reasons of Military Dominance in Pakistan By Major Qaiser Jadoon

Why military is more powerful than civil government in Pakistan detail anylisis

In Pakistan, as in most countries, the military and civil government have distinct roles and powers. While both institutions play vital roles in the country, the military has historically wielded significant influence and power. Here is a detailed analysis of why the military is considered more powerful than the civil government in Pakistan:

1.Historical factors: Pakistan has experienced multiple military coups and periods of military rule throughout its history. The country has been under direct military rule for nearly half of its existence since gaining independence in 1947. These prolonged periods of military rule have allowed the military to consolidate its power and establish a strong institutional presence within the country.

2. Security concerns: Pakistan faces several security challenges, including internal instability, regional tensions, and conflicts with neighboring countries like India and Afghanistan. Given these challenges, the military has traditionally been allocated a significant share of the national budget, enabling it to develop and maintain a well-equipped and powerful force. This allocation of resources enhances the military's influence and strengthens its position in the country.

3. Strategic influence: The military in Pakistan often plays a significant role in shaping the country's strategic policies, particularly in matters related to national security, foreign relations, and defense. The military leadership has been involved in decision-making processes, sometimes even superseding civilian authorities. This influence allows the military to assert its power and shape important policy directions, often at the expense of civilian institutions.

4. Economic involvement: The military in Pakistan has significant economic interests and controls various business enterprises, including industrial units, commercial ventures, and even agricultural lands. These economic interests provide the military with an additional power base and financial resources outside the control of the civilian government. Such involvement also allows the military to exert influence over economic policies and decision-making.

Control of key institutions: The military in Pakistan has historically maintained a firm grip on key institutions such as the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), which is the country's intelligence agency. The ISI has a broad mandate, including domestic and foreign intelligence operations, and its influence extends to matters beyond security. This control over key institutions allows the military to extend its power and influence over various aspects of governance.

5. Political instability: Pakistan has experienced frequent political instability, with weak and fragmented civilian governments often struggling to maintain a cohesive and effective administration. This instability creates a power vacuum that the military has historically capitalized on, leading to military interventions and assuming control of governance. The military's ability to step in during such periods of instability reinforces its position as a powerful institution in the country.

6. Public perception and support: The military in Pakistan enjoys a significant level of public support and admiration due to its role in national defense and security. The military has been involved in various by humanitarian and relief efforts, and its contributions during natural disasters or emergencies have garnered public support. This positive perception further enhances the military's power and influence in the country.

Conclusion
It's important to note that the power dynamics between the military and civil government in Pakistan have evolved over time, and there have been efforts to strengthen democratic institutions and civilian rule. However, the factors mentioned above have historically contributed to the military's perception of being more powerful than the civil government in Pakistan.
By Major Qaiser Jadoon

28/08/2022

28/08/2022

Terrible situation of Flood
God help us Ameen