Philippine Vission TV

Philippine Vission TV ♥️✌️

16/01/2025

Napakaswerte ng Distrito 2 Mabini Batangas Dahil may isang mapagmahal na Mahal Cong Mayora, Congresswoman Atty. Gerville "Jinky Bitrics" Luistro At Ipagpatuloy Ang nagawa sa kanyang Distrito 🙏🙏🙏♥️♥️

Maraming salamat po sa pagbibigay ng pagkakataon upang mas makilala ng ating mga kababayan sa Iloilo, at mapag-usapan an...
16/01/2025

Maraming salamat po sa pagbibigay ng pagkakataon upang mas makilala ng ating mga kababayan sa Iloilo, at mapag-usapan ang ating mga isusulong sa hinaharap.

Karangalan po nating makasama ang ilan sa mga magagaling na Anchor na sina Aksyon John Paul Tia, RadyoMan Regan Arlos, RadyoMan Novie Guazo, at Bombo Donnie Degala.





16/01/2025
16/01/2025

SINO po ang nakakaalam nang pinangyarihan nito?

Mangyaring itawag po ninyo sa ating opisina para sa kaukulang aksyon.

RSAP Hotlines:
09176782016
09209601999
09171623303

Maraming salamat po.

Congressman BONIFACIO L BOSITA

16/01/2025

As always, a Duterte ally is spreading fake news.

----------------

Fact-Check: Walang Budget Cut sa NCIP para sa Scholarships at Training!

Mga kababayan, linawin natin ang usapan tungkol sa budget ng NCIP (National Commission on Indigenous Peoples) para sa scholarships at training. Heto ang mga facts:
1. Budget Buo at Walang Bawas
Ang budget na P235,990,000 para sa scholarships at training ng NCIP na nakapaloob sa 2025 National Expenditure Program (NEP) ay eksaktong inaprubahan sa 2025 General Appropriations Act (GAA). Walang nabawas, buo pa rin!
2. Pondo Lahat Naka-allocate
Lahat ng pondo para sa scholarships at training ay naaprubahan at intact. Walang binawasan ang Kongreso sa aspetong ito.
3. Sa NCIP ang Sagot Kung May Suspension
Kung may isyu ng suspension ng applications para sa scholarships, dapat direktang manggaling sa NCIP ang paliwanag. Ang malinaw lang ngayon: ang pondo para sa programa nila ay buo.

Sa mga nagpapakalat ng maling impormasyon, huwag na tayong magpadala. Mag-research muna at kunin ang mga detalye mula sa official sources.

16/01/2025

‘Saang planeta galing ang ₱58?’: House leader slams DA over ‘unrealistic’ rice price ceiling, calls it a ‘disservice to consumers’

A House leader on Wednesday criticized the Department of Agriculture (DA) led by Sec. Francisco "Kiko" P. Tiu Laurel Jr. for setting the maximum suggested retail price (MSRP) for rice at ₱58 per kilo, calling the figure “unrealistic” and “a disservice to consumers.”

Deputy Majority Leader and Iloilo 1st District Rep. Janette Garin expressed her frustration during the hearing of the Quinta Comm, also known as the Murang Pagkain Supercommittee, chaired by Albay 2nd District Rep. Joey Sarte Salceda.

Garin accused the DA of failing to address key issues in the rice supply chain that have driven up prices. The panel decided to invite Laurel to the next hearing.

“Bakit naman si DA may MSRP na ₱58, saang planeta ito nanggaling, Mr. Chair?” Garin said during her interpellation, stressing that the MSRP should have been lower after the price of regular milled rice dropped.

Salceda questioned DA Undersecretary Asis Perez on the basis of the P58 per kilo MSRP.

“Diyos ko ang taas nun,” said Salceda nothing that the cost of imported rice has gone down to between P44 and P47, while the buying price for palay (unmilled rice) has fallen as well.

Garin said that in an inspection and consultation with the wholesalers in Bulacan, “it was announced in the media by no other than Sec. Kiko Tiu Laurel together with the DA family that they will bring down the price of rice to P45 to P49, parang P49 yung premium.”

Garin stressed that this did not happen.

Sultan Kudarat Rep. Honacio Suansing Jr., who was present in the said meeting, agreed with Garin.

“We all agree, the rice miller there, importers, traders that we will lower the price of rice to P40 and the supply is unlimited. Tapos na tayo dapat ‘dun, in NCR (National Capital Region) area dapat marami ng P40 per kilo na bigas na binibigay sa Kadiwa and other outlets ng DA that is the agreement last December,” Suansing said.

The price of regular rice is being sold at P37 to P38 in the market.

“How can we control the price of rice when the agency that is supposed to guide us is pe***ng it at a high price?” Garin asked.

Garin cited reports showing that the landed cost of imported rice ranged from P35 to P39 per kilo, significantly lower than the DA’s MSRP.

Even with logistics and markups, she argued, rice should not exceed P45 to P49 per kilo at retail.

“Kung ang landed cost ay P35, maibebenta mo siya ng P42 to P43. ‘Yung iba namang landed cost ay P39, maibebenta mo siya ng P47 to P48. Pero siyempre, ‘pag may damage, logistics, aakyat siya, pinakamataas P49,” she explained.

Perez defended the P58 MSRP as part of a pilot program for Metro Manila, stating that it was designed to address higher rice prices in the area, reportedly ranging from P62 to P64 per kilo.

Perez said the P58 price “is based on the landed cost of imported rice, plus a reasonable mark-up for all those involved in the distribution chain, mahaba po ‘yang chain na yan.”

“Linawin ko lang, Mr. Chair, na ‘yung MSRP is a pilot program that will implement only in Metro Manila kung saan may nakikita kami mga presyo na P62, P64, P60,” Perez explained.

However, Garin dismissed this explanation, calling it a “wrong solution” that fails to tackle the root causes of high rice prices.

“No, I’m sorry, Mr. Chair. I’m sorry, Usec Asis, but that is a wrong solution. Wido-wido ‘yun. How do we resolve the problem of mahal na bigas? Magkano ang landed cost? Magkano ang kapital ng local farmer? Magkano ang pwedeng ipatong ng mga dadaanan?” she argued.

Garin also accused the DA of neglecting its responsibility to monitor and regulate the supply chain, alleging that collusion among traders and monopolistic practices among retailers were inflating prices.

She reiterated her call for the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) to probe the matter.

“Apparently, there’s a flow of at least five traders before the rice reaches the actual retailer. And I remember, Mr. Chair, I previously filed a motion directing the NBI to look into the traders in between because the collusion is happening here. We can’t just turn a blind eye to this,” she said.

The seasoned legislator pointed to lower rice prices in Mindanao, where rice was reportedly sold for P37 to P45 per kilo, with premium varieties capped at P50.

“Ang katanungan nito, ba’t nagagawa doon sa Mindanao? Bakit dito hindi?” Garin asked.

The Iloilo lawmaker criticized the DA’s method for setting the MSRP, arguing that it was based on inflated market prices rather than actual production costs and reasonable margins.

“Bumalik tayo sa wholesalers, nagsalita ang ibang traders, nagsalita ang retailers, pinuntahan natin ang Bulacan. At ang ipinapakita doon, it was Secretary Laurel who mentioned P45 to P49 max, Mr. Chair. In other words, the basis of the MSRP is wrong. And it’s opening the possibility of abuse,” Garin said.

Garin concluded by holding government officials accountable for what she described as inaction on systemic issues in the rice market.

“Collusion among the traders, monopoly among the retailers in the market, and our government officials who are supposed to look into this not really doing their job. These are the problems we need to solve,” she declared.

The Quinta Comm is tasked with addressing the systemic challenges of soaring food prices, smuggling, price manipulation, and hunger—issues that have left millions of Filipinos struggling to access affordable and secure food.

Formed under House Resolution (HR) No. 254, introduced by Speaker Ferdinand Martin G. Romualdez, this supercommittee brings together five key committees to identify gaps in government programs and hold accountable those responsible for market abuses.

The joint panel is composed of the Committees on Ways and Means, Trade and Industry, Agriculture and Food, Social Services, and the Special Committee on Food Security.

16/01/2025

Speaker Ferdinand Martin G. Romualdez engages in a cordial conversation with the delegation of Hungarian lawmakers, led by Mr. Zsolt Nemeth, Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the Hungarian National Assembly, during their courtesy call at the House of Representatives Wednesday afternoon. They explored avenues to further bolster not only inter-parliamentary relations but also the bilateral diplomatic, economic and trade cooperation for the mutual benefit of Philippines and Hungary.

16/01/2025

DDS are truly stupid liars. The quality of their anti-Speaker Martin rhetoric has plummeted lower than the netherworlds.

All the budget cuts that they are alleging as the handiwork of Congress were, in truth, done by the Senate.

Read this and weep.

-----------

Sino Ba Talaga Ang May Sala? Kwento sa Likod ng Panggugupit sa Pondo ng DepEd, PhilHealth, at DSWD

Grabe, trending ngayon ang usapan tungkol sa 2025 national budget! Bakit kamo? Aba, kasi naman binawasan nang malala ang pondo ng DepEd, PhilHealth, at DSWD. Ang tanong ng bayan: sino ang salarin? Ang dami nang bumabanat sa House of Representatives na sila raw ang nagbawas ng pondo. Pero teka, chill lang, kasi hindi ganito kasimple ang kwento. Kung tutuusin, ang tunay na “gupit master” dito, eh, ang Senado. Oo, Senate boys, kayo ‘yun.

Ano Ba Talaga Nangyari?

Ganito kasi ‘yan: kada taon, ang national budget ay parang teleserye—may bida, kontrabida, at syempre, plot twist. Una, gagawa si Presidente ng plano (tinatawag na National Expenditure Program o NEP), na parang wishlist ng gobyerno kung saan mapupunta ang pera. Ipapasa ‘yan sa House of Representatives, na magre-review at mag-aapruba bago ipadala sa Senado. Pero, sa pinakakritikal na eksena—ang Bicameral Conference Committee (Bicam)—dyan nagaganap ang malaking balyahan sa budget.

Ayon sa mga record, halos sinunod ng House ang plano ni Pangulong Marcos. Dinagdagan pa nga nila ang pondo ng mga ahensyang importante:
• DepEd: Nilagyan pa ng dagdag na PHP 563 milyon para sa mga eskwelahan.
• PhilHealth: Binuhusan ng PHP 51 bilyon para sa healthcare ng bayan.
• DSWD: Binigyan ng PHP 83.47 bilyon dagdag para sa tulong sa mahihirap.

Bakit Binawasan ang Budget ng OVP?

Binawasan ng House ang budget ng Office of the Vice President (OVP) ng PHP 1.29 bilyon. Bakit? Hindi lang dahil sa kontrobersyal na Confidential and Intelligence Funds (CIFs) na dapat naman para sa mga ahensyang may hawak ng seguridad tulad ng PNP at DND. Isa pang dahilan: upang i-centralize ang pondo sa mga ahensyang may mandato na magpatupad ng mga programa at serbisyo.

Ang mga pondong tinanggal sa OVP ay inilipat sa:
• DSWD para sa ayuda sa mahihirap.
• DOLE para sa employment programs.
• DOH at PhilHealth para sa serbisyong pangkalusugan.

Pagpasok ng Senado: Ang “Bicam Slasher”

Pero ang tunay na suntok sa budget? Nangyari sa Bicam. Pagdating sa negosasyon, biglang ginupitan ng Senado nang malala ang pondo ng mga ahensya. Ito ang mga nangyari:
• DepEd: Nabawasan ng PHP 11.57 bilyon.
• PhilHealth: Sinagasaan ng PHP 74.43 bilyon na bawas.
• DSWD: Na-chop ng PHP 95.92 bilyon.

Kung pagbabasehan ang mga numero, hindi fair na sabihin na House ang may kasalanan. Sa bersyon nila, pinrotektahan nila ang pondo ng mga ahensya tulad ng DepEd, PhilHealth, at DSWD. Ang malaking bawas lang nila ay sa OVP, at justified pa ito dahil questionable ang CIFs at ang pag-centralize ng mga programa sa tamang ahensya.

Sa kabilang banda, ang Senado ang nag-slash ng bilyon-bilyon sa Bicam. Kaya kung gusto natin malaman kung bakit lumiit ang pondo ng DepEd, PhilHealth, at DSWD, Senado ang dapat sumagot.

Dapat May Matutunan Dito

Kung ayaw nating maulit ang ganitong gulo, may mga kailangang ayusin:
• Transparency sa Bicam: Hindi pwedeng tago-tago ang negosasyon, lalo na kung bilyon ang usapan.
• Accountability ng Senado: Kailangang ipaliwanag ng Senado, lalo na ni Escudero, kung bakit nila ginupitan ang mga kritikal na pondo.
• Malinaw na patakaran sa CIFs: Para lang ito sa mga ahensyang may kinalaman sa seguridad, hindi kung kanino lang.
• Pagkaisa ng House at Senate: Imbes na magbangayan, dapat magtulungan ang dalawang kapulungan para masigurong walang naiiwang Pilipino sa usapang budget.

Konklusyon

Ang kwento ng 2025 budget ay hindi lang tungkol sa pera—kwento ito ng pulitika, kompromiso, at power play. Oo, napilitan ang House na sumang-ayon para hindi magka-impasse ang budget. Pero ang malaking tanong: Bakit napunta sa ganitong sitwasyon? Kung talagang gusto natin ng hustisya sa budget, panahon na para humingi ng paliwanag sa Senado. Ang budget ay para sa tao, hindi para sa pulitika. Kaya dapat malinaw: sino ba talaga ang may sala?

Taos-pusong pasasalamat po ang ating ipinapaabot sa FFCCCII sa kanilang token of appreciation at sa kanilang 70 years na...
16/01/2025

Taos-pusong pasasalamat po ang ating ipinapaabot sa FFCCCII sa kanilang token of appreciation at sa kanilang 70 years nang pagkilos para sa nation-building.

Saludo po kami sa inyong mga programa, gaya ng Libreng Gamutan, Barrio Schools, at iba pang mahahalagang proyekto para sa bayan!





16/01/2025
15/01/2025

JOINT COMMITTEE (MURANG PAGKAIN SUPER COMMITTEE) - JANUARY 15, 2025

COMMITEES ON WAYS AND MEANS, TRADE AND INDUSTRY, AGRICULTURE AND FOOD, SOCIAL SERVICES, AND SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON FOOD SECURITY

Agenda:
HR 254 – Authorizing the Committees on Ways and Means, Trade and Industry, Agriculture and Food, Social Services, and the Special Committee on Food Security to conduct a joint inquiry, in aid of legislation, relative to house resolutions and privilege speeches referred to the mentioned committees including motu proprio investigations on the implementation of government programs to address smuggling and price manipulation of basic goods and essential commodities, mitigate hunger, and promote food and nutrition security (Speaker Ferdinand Martin Romualdez)

15/01/2025

President Marcos and Speaker Romualdez Garner High Trust Ratings, Reflecting Strong Executive-Legislative Partnership

The latest Tugon ng Masa (TNM) survey conducted by OCTA Research from November 10 to 16, 2024, highlights the enduring trust and satisfaction of Filipinos in President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. and House Speaker Ferdinand Martin Romualdez. The two leaders recorded consistently high ratings, underscoring their strong partnership in driving the administration’s legislative agenda and addressing the country’s most pressing challenges.

Key Numbers: Trust and Performance Ratings
• President Marcos: The President achieved a 65% trust rating, slightly declining by 4 points from the previous quarter, and a 64% performance satisfaction rating, down by 2 points but still reflective of majority support.
• Speaker Romualdez: The Speaker earned a 58% trust rating, showing a modest 3-point decrease from Q3 2024, and a 59% performance satisfaction rating, maintaining steady support for his leadership of the House of Representatives.

These ratings place both leaders in the majority-trust and majority-satisfaction categories, making them among the highest-rated officials in government.

Strong Partnership as a Pillar of Success

The strong collaboration between President Marcos and Speaker Romualdez has been instrumental in achieving high public trust and satisfaction ratings. Their partnership is marked by:
1. Alignment on Key Policies: President Marcos’s “Bagong Pilipinas” agenda has been reinforced by Speaker Romualdez’s leadership in passing critical legislative measures. From economic recovery programs to social welfare initiatives, Congress has served as a dependable ally in implementing the President’s priorities.
2. Efficient Legislative Output: Under Romualdez’s leadership, the House has fast-tracked priority bills such as the 2025 General Appropriations Act and economic stimulus measures, which have been key to addressing inflation, promoting investments, and creating jobs.
3. Unified Leadership: The tandem of Marcos and Romualdez reflects political stability and cohesive governance, which resonates positively with Filipinos. This strong executive-legislative relationship has minimized partisan conflicts and ensured swift action on pressing national issues.

Regional and Demographic Breakdown

The survey results show that both leaders enjoy robust support across regions and socioeconomic classes:
• President Marcos:
• Trust is highest in Visayas (74%), followed by Balance Luzon (66%), Mindanao (65%), and Metro Manila (66%).
• Performance satisfaction is similarly strong in Visayas (72%) and Balance Luzon (65%), with Mindanao and Metro Manila registering 65% and 63%, respectively.
• Across socioeconomic classes, trust ranges from 60% (Class E) to 66% (Classes ABC and D), while performance satisfaction is highest among Classes ABC and D at 65%.
• Speaker Romualdez:
• Trust is strongest in Mindanao (66%), followed by Balance Luzon (61%), Metro Manila (61%), and Visayas (61%).
• Performance satisfaction mirrors this trend, peaking in Mindanao (69%), with Balance Luzon, Metro Manila, and Visayas recording 61% each.
• Socioeconomic support is robust among Classes ABC and D, both at 62% trust, while Class E recorded 54%.

Comparison with Other Leaders

The ratings of President Marcos and Speaker Romualdez surpass those of Vice President Sara Duterte, whose trust and performance satisfaction ratings fell to 49% and 48%, respectively, highlighting the effectiveness of the executive-legislative partnership as a key factor in public confidence.

Why Filipinos Trust Marcos and Romualdez

Political analysts attribute the high ratings of Marcos and Romualdez to their shared commitment to addressing key national issues:
1. Economic Recovery: Both leaders have prioritized measures to stabilize inflation, generate jobs, and attract investments, which resonate strongly with the public.
2. Social Services: Initiatives on education, housing, and healthcare have reinforced their image as leaders focused on inclusive governance.
3. Leadership Stability: Their seamless coordination has minimized political friction, creating a sense of stability and trust in the government’s ability to deliver.

Implications for Governance

The high trust and performance ratings of President Marcos and Speaker Romualdez demonstrate the public’s approval of their leadership and collaboration. As the administration continues its term, their partnership will remain crucial in advancing legislative priorities and addressing the evolving needs of Filipinos.

Conclusion

President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.’s 65% trust and 64% satisfaction ratings, alongside Speaker Ferdinand Martin Romualdez’s 58% trust and 59% satisfaction ratings, reflect a strong and effective executive-legislative relationship. This partnership has been pivotal in ensuring the success of the administration’s agenda and fostering public confidence in governance.

The Tugon ng Masa survey, conducted with 1,200 respondents nationwide and a ±3% margin of error, underscores the enduring appeal of cohesive leadership in navigating the nation’s challenges.

Address

Manila City
Manila

Telephone

+639686928905

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Philippine Vission TV posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Videos

Share