The Focus

The Focus The Focus is a news, information and entertainment medium that is focused on disseminating factual a

Amanze Obi’s spiral of liesBy Bayo Onanuga On Monday  11 December, I stumbled on the 6th, in the series of opinions abou...
16/12/2023

Amanze Obi’s spiral of lies

By Bayo Onanuga

On Monday 11 December, I stumbled on the 6th, in the series of opinions about the last general election being peddled by Daily Sun columnist, Amanze Obi. I was shocked by the cocktail of lies and fallacies put forward by the writer, on why his candidate, Peter Obi lost the last presidential election and President Bola Ahmed Tinubu won. This spurred my frantic search for the 5th edition. It was more of the same, indeed dangerous as Amanze tried, albeit fruitlessly, to instigate Christians and their leaders against President Tinubu and Vice President Kashim Shettima. Believing so much in his concocted Islamic conspiracy against Christians, Amanze Obi wondered why there was no “fury”, or ‘outrage’ displayed by the Christians after Tinubu’s election.

In the two articles that I read, Amanze, disappointedly, packed too many falsehoods about the last election such that ignoring him will be a great disservice to our people, especially the younger, impressionable, easily excitable ones. To Amanze and his ilk, I will say it is too early to start distorting the story of the last election, with clearly revisionist misleading information, that one will only come across at beer parlours or market places.

In trying to decode Tinubu’s emergence as candidate of the APC, Amanze Obi invented a conspiracy of northern muslims who had “the temerity to insist on a muslim-muslim ticket as a condition for power shift to the south”. There was nothing of such. Tinubu went into the primary election to slug it out with Rotimi Amaechi, Yemi Osinbajo, both Christians and Ahmad Lawan, a muslim. Religion was not the issue at this stage. What was at stake was each candidate’s appeal to party delegates. Tinubu won a landslide victory, because many delegates believed he has the experience, political and national network to beat other candidates from the other parties and succeed President Muhammadu Buhari. Tinubu, as candidate, saw himself as a nationalist. It was the myopic and parochial political opponents that tried, in vain, to define him by his faith. The opposition ought to have known that a man whose wife is a Christian, whose children are allowed to practice their own faith, cannot be stereotyped by his faith.

This worldview of the candidate explains why throughout his campaign, he did not appeal to the base sentiments of his religion, he did not see himself as a Jihadist, unlike another candidate that rallied clerics to see the election as a ‘religious war’. Tinubu sold his programme of action to make our country better to voters, even when he was the target of unprecedented vitriolic attacks by opponents, the worst political behaviour ever witnessed in our political history.

When Tinubu chose Kashim Shettima, as his running mate, he was reawakening the spirit of June 12, 1993 presidential election, in which an Abiola-Kingibe combination resoundingly won the election. The victory was cruelly annulled by the military junta, led by General Ibrahim Babaginda.

When Tinubu chose Shettima, religion was not part of his political calculation. He was focused on a higher ideal, placing factors such as competence, innovation, compassion, integrity, fairness, and adherence to excellence, above religious sentiments.

Tinubu’s statement after announcing Shettima’s nomination as his running mate is worth recalling:

“I am mindful of the energetic discourse concerning the possible religion of my running mate. Just and noble people have talked to me about this. Some have counselled that I should select a Christian to please the Christian community. Others have said I should pick a Muslim to appeal to the Muslim community. Clearly, I cannot do both.

“Both sides of the debate have impressive reason and passionate arguments supporting their position. Both arguments are right in their own way. But neither is right in the way that Nigeria needs at the moment. As president, I hope to govern this nation toward uncommon progress. This will require innovation. It will require steps never before taken. It will also require decisions that are politically difficult and rare.

“If I am to be that type of President, I must begin by being that type of candidate. Let me make the bold and innovative decision not to win political points but to move the nation and our party’s campaign closer to the greatness that we were meant to achieve.

“Here is where politics ends, and true leadership must begin.

“Today, I announce my selection with pride because I have made it not based on religion or to please one community or the other. I made this choice because I believe this is the man who can help me bring the best governance to all Nigerians, period, regardless of their religious affiliation or considerations of ethnicity or region”.

The result of the election in all the six zones showed that Tinubu’s political calculation worked. Just like it worked for Abiola-Kingibe in 1993.

It was not true that Tinubu ‘roundly lost the ‘Christian South’ as Amanze wrote. Indeed there is no such geographical or demographic division in our country. While we have a preponderance of Christians in the South-East and South-South, we cannot say the same of the South-West where the two predominant faiths have adherents. Tinubu won the South-West, and had very poor number from the South-East because the voters erected an iron curtain against other candidates, except Peter Obi, who belongs to their ethnic stock. Tinubu also had a good showing in the South-South states of Edo, Delta, Cross River and Rivers, where he had, at least the mandatory 25 percent of the votes. Again, Amanze was wrong to say that Tinubu did not have ‘the right appeal’ to the voters in the entire three zones in Southern Nigeria, as the facts above have demonstrated. The only place where the voters were blinded about Tinubu was in the South-East and all Nigerians know why that was so.

In the second part of Amanze’s article that I read, it was shocking that Amanze was still peddling the egregious lie that Peter Obi and not Bola Tinubu won the election, even when third-placed Obi still has second placed Atiku Abubakar to surpass to claim the trophy.

Let me say loud and clear. Obi lost the election. INEC did not scheme him out. The so-called popular impression about his purported victory was the product of an echo chamber of Obi’s supporters. You all hoped Obi would win, you even conducted fake polls, but the reality of Nigeria’s electoral map made all the pre-poll projections unrealistic.

Of the three major candidates, Obi had the narrowest path to victory. Outside his home base in the South-East, part of the South-South and Lagos, where he sprang an electoral upset, Obi only showed presence in the northern part of the country in the predominantly Christian states, such as Nasarawa, Plateau and Benue, where he was checkmated by Governor Hyancinth Alia, in favour of the APC candidate, now President Tinubu. In more populous North-West states, Obi was not in contention. He was a political paper weight. Similarly, in Kwara, Niger and Kogi states, Obi had scant appeal. He suffered similar fate in Adamawa, Gombe, Bauchi, Borno, Yobe and Taraba.

It is uncharitable and malicious for Amanze to attribute Tinubu’s victory to other factors other than his popularity with the voters. In the three horse race, Tinubu was the pre-eminent favourite of the Nigerian people.

Obi’s supporters who often adduce extraneous reasons to Obi’s political Waterloo, often forget the APC was in control of 21 states before the election. Polls by the APC before the election showed that our candidate was destined to win at the first ballot, despite all the obstacles of currency and petrol scarcity and the incumbent’s unpopularity in some parts of the country.

The election result was an upset of sort as we did not expect a tight race.

No one in his right senses would have expected Tinubu to come back empty handed in states under the control of his party. Despite the upsets in several states, our candidate was able to muster the votes that matter, pulling 25 percent of the votes in 30 states, leading in 11, recording tight race in Katsina, Sokoto, with the presumed ‘northern candidate’. Not to forget, our candidate reaped a political windfall from the crisis in PDP, which boosted his votes in Rivers and Oyo.

Amanze Obi should desist from spreading fantasies about the last election. Tinubu won it free and fair. "Popular impression” not based on hard facts, does not win any election. Any candidate who wants to win a general election must work hard to win plural votes in four of the six regions that make up the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Peter Obi succeeded only in two and fell seriously short in the other four.

I will end with this story about the 1979 election, which Shehu Shagari won. In Ogun State capital, Abeokuta, the popular impression was that Shagari’s National Party of Nigeria would sweep the polls. The party was the noisiest, the most visible in the city as it had in its fold many prominent sons of the town. But an opinion poll conducted by the PUNCH newspaper showed contrarily that Awolowo’s Unity Party of Nigeria was headed to victory. The election result affirmed the pre-poll prediction and also affirmed that Shagari and Awolowo would emerge the two leading candidates.

The PUNCH poll was unlike the ‘arrangee’ polls conducted by Peter Obi and his friends before the election. The latter gave Obi’s supporters false hopes, false expectations of a forlorn victory. Amanze, it’s time to shake off your disappointment and quit the business of election fortune-telling.

-Onanuga is Special Adviser to President Tinubu on Information & Strategy

NLC/TUC CANNOT BE A LAW UNTO THEMSELVESFollowing from the hazy events sorrounding the NLC protest or is it labour party ...
10/11/2023

NLC/TUC CANNOT BE A LAW UNTO THEMSELVES

Following from the hazy events sorrounding the NLC protest or is it labour party campaign rally of November 1 2023 in Owerri the Imo state capital, the Nigeria Labour Congress raised an alarm that it's president Joe Ajaero had been abducted by operatives of the Nigeria police force and issued an ultimatum for his release within 24 hours, failure which it threatened to embark on a nationwide strike.

Barely within 24 hours, Nigerians were regaled with the picture and a video of the NLC president in a vehicle looking battered and the NLC claimed that it's president Joe Ajaero was brutalized with accusing fingers pointed at the Nigeria police force. The NLC also pointed accusing fingers at Governor Hope Uzodinma of Imo State as being responsible.

Following this allegations, the Nigeria police force came out and denied involvement in the brutalization, claiming that it rescued the NLC President by taking him into protective custody to save his life when he was under attack. The Imo State government also came out to deny involvement in the matter.

As a discerning political observer, what came to one's mind, was to ask that since Mr. Ajaero was brutalized and accusing fingers are being pointed in two directions of the Imo State government and the Nigeria Police force, who really is responsible? The Nigeria police force like we all know is an independent institution that is not answerable to the Imo State Government, so who really is NLC alleging as being responsible for it's president plight, is it the Nigeria police force or Imo State government or both?

The NLC even went further by demanding the immediate removal and prosecution of the Imo State Commissioner of Police, the area commander and others on the basis of it's allegations for the brutalization of Mr Ajaero. The statement made made many Nigerians and persons of sound minds to ask that, what manner of reasoning is this? A party to a matter alledges and at the same time make demands, which amounts to being the accuser, prosecutor, judge and jury in your own case. This is a total negation of the principle of justice and fair hearing which asserts that you can't be a judge in your own case.

For our information, Mr. Ajaero is an adult in control of his senses and being the victim, he should come out to narrate his story rather than what we are hearing from a third party, the NLC who have taken up the narration rather than the victim himself, thus one is confused by this and am sure millions of Nigerians are.

However, we must state that different narrations of what transpired and resulted in the brutalization of the NLC president continue to dominate the public space. One version which sticks out strongly is that the NLC mobilized workers in Imo State for a protest against the state government labour policies even in the face of a court injunction barring NLC and TUC from embarking on any protest in the state and that when some of the workers who heeded the invitation amassed at the venue, they discovered that it was a labour party campaign rally and felt angry that they were deceived by the NLC through Mr. Ajaero for a partisan political campaign ahead of the forthcoming gubernatorial election in the state which was less than two weeks, and in that fit of anger over the deception and disagreement, a fracas ensued and the NLC president was assaulted by angry workers.

Again, we ask that was it only the NLC president that went for this protest rally/labour party campaign without his executive members and others who had the same mandate with him because how come he was the only one who was assaulted? Was the NLC president running a one man show on this adventure in Imo State? Can the NLC avail us videos or images for us to have a glimpse of the protest rally/campaign in Owerri so that some light can be thrown into this event of many versions? A lot of things don't add up in the story that is coming out from the NLC.

We are also aware that the Imo State Governor Senator Hope Uzodinma came out openly to condemn the NLC president Joe Ajaero partisanship in the politics of Imo State by pleading that he separate labour issues from his political partisanship in his Ajaero home state, in order not to imperil the hard fought reputation and integrity of the NLC which is a product of centuries of dedication to the worthy cause of labour struggles.

Mr. Joe Ajaero is not the first president of the NLC and won't be the last, but his political partisanship in this dispensation is rubbing off damagingly on the image and integrity of the Nigeria Labour Congress, his sincerity and objectivity to lead the struggle of the Nigerian workers outside of his political interest, sticks out like a sore thumb and is questionable.

While we concede that the NLC has a right to speak for it's president if his right or that of any worker or Nigerian has been assaulted, but as Nigerians we also have a right to know the truth in order to be on the same page in the agitation for justice because we don't know whose turn it will be tomorrow, but we must warn that the NLC cannot take the law into its hands by being a judge in a matter in which it is an interested party by issuing threats, ultimatum, placing fatwa on a Nigerian citizen Governor Hope Uzodinma, embarking on economic sabotage of airport blockade, etc, it is absolutely unacceptable and condemnable.

The NLC and it's sister organization TUC cannot be a judge in their own matter, this runs contrary to the tenets of natural justice and is totally unacceptable. The NLC president was alledgely brutalized by persons whose identity the Nigeria state and people cannot authenticate, save for the narration from Ajaero and NLC, and yet they have taken it upon themselves against fair hearing and justice to unilaterally alledge, prosecute and pass judgement by issuing threats, ultimatum, placing fatwa, embarking on economic blockade of the livelihood of Nigeria and Nigerians as well as threatening our democracy.

As we write, the NLC and TUC knowing well that we operate a constitutional democracy in which we are governed by laws, has not deemed it fit to report what happened to the NLC president Joe Ajaero to any security or state agencies as required by law. Rather the NLC and TUC have taken the law into their hands by engaging in acts inimical to national security, economy and our democracy which stands condemned in all ramifications.

The assault on Mr Joe Ajaero the NLC president is a criminal matter that borders on an assault on the constitution of the Federal republic of Nigeria and is not a labour issue for which the organized labour is issuing threats of a nationwide strike, blockade of airports, threats to shutdown power supply to Imo State and other condemnable acts that is a threat to our democracy and national security.

The NLC and TUC cannot be bigger than our law, they must submit to our constitutionally established dispute resolution mechanism rather than this barbaric route of taken the law into their hands which makes them liable for infractions of our law which represents the collective will of the Nigerian people that they always profess to agitate for.

The NLC and TUC must be admonished that Nigerians will not sit idly and watch them imperil our hard earned democracy by anti democratic acts against the conduct of a free, fair, credible and successful election in Imo State on the 11th of November 2023, Nigerians and the international community are hereby put on notice to hold the NLC and TUC responsible for any acts of breach of the credible and successful conduct of that election and threat to national security.

The NLC and TUC cannot and must not be allowed to be a law unto themselves, never.

A word is enough for the wise.

Thank you.

Yours Sincerely,

Nelson Ekujumi,
[email protected]

STATE HOUSE PRESS RELEASETIME FOR ATIKU ABUBAKAR TO FINALLY GO AWAY AND END HIS AMBITION TO BE PRESIDENTFormer Vice Pres...
31/10/2023

STATE HOUSE PRESS RELEASE

TIME FOR ATIKU ABUBAKAR TO FINALLY GO AWAY AND END HIS AMBITION TO BE PRESIDENT

Former Vice President and Peoples Democratic Party Presidential candidate in last election, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, unraveled on Monday at a press conference in Abuja where he finally found his voice after more than 96 hours to respond to his trouncing at the Supreme Court in a landmark judgment on his grossly incompetent election petition appeal.

We were wrong to expect that Atiku at 77 would play the statesman and sportsman and accept, with equanimity, the verdict of the highest court and the people of Nigeria.
Instead, he unashamedly constituted himself into a demagogue and anarchist in the way and manner he sought to pull down and delegitimize all the institutions of State, all in a futile bid to achieve what he could not get via the ballot box.

At his press conference where he laboured, in vain, to once again manipulate public opinion and blame the judiciary for his self-inflicted defeat in the 25 February Presidential election, Alhaji Atiku launched a diatribe against the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and judiciary, particularly our apex court, for not bending the law and the constitution to satisfy his whims and caprices.

Atiku tried very hard to perfect his act of misinformation by seeking to lay claim to faux morality and higher ideals when in actual fact his entire life is antithetical to any higher ideals.

For instance, Atiku claimed he worked along with others to end military rule in Nigeria when he was known to be in bed with the same junta who held democracy hostage and incarcerated his mentor, Major-General Shehu Musa Yar'Adua (rtd), till death. He distanced himself from him while in detention to keep alive his governorship ambition on the platform of one of those inglorious Abacha political parties.

Atiku's brand of politics is such that once an electoral process or election does not go his way or pave the way for his victory, democracy becomes dysfunctional and must therefore be imperiled. For him, democracy should either go his way or the highway.

The PDP candidate was uncharitable and pugnacious in his choice of words and his view about Nigeria. We can only imagine the level of frustration that could make a former Vice President of Nigeria to hold such pessimistic view of a country where he once occupied the second highest position. The PDP candidate said Nigeria is doomed just because he failed to achieve his personal ambition.

We want to tell Alhaji Atiku this: Nigeria is not doomed. It is only Atiku's inordinate ambition to be President that is doomed. Nigeria is moving forward and set to achieve its manifest destiny as one of the most respected and successful nations of the world under the leadership of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

Contrary to Atiku’s gloomy submission on our democracy, we are excited to tell the world that our democracy is thriving and blossoming. It is the reason, for the first time, since 1999 the character of our National Assembly and its outlook reflect the diversity and plurality of the choices and preferences of voters as a rainbow coalition of different parties as opposed to the practice in the past where just two parties dominated the national parliament.

In today's Nigeria, votes count. No amount of deliberate distortions of facts about our recent election by Alhaji Atiku and his partner, Peter Obi can vitiate the continuous improvement of our electoral process which local and international observers have hailed. As declared by the Supreme Court, IReV was not designed as an online collation centre. It was simply a public viewing centre for results.

PDP and Atiku, including Peter Obi’s faction of Labour Party cannot continue to insist on their own reality against commonsense, logic and the law.

Atiku and his army of hirelings knew why they lost the election. The PDP candidate lost because Nigerians preferred Bola Ahmed Tinubu and voted for him to be president. Tinubu, along with his APC, won because he offered a better vision for our country’s future. The All Progressives Congress as a united and formidable party which ran a well-coordinated campaign with his rank and file intact.

Atiku lost because he went into a major election with a fragmented and tattered umbrella that could not hold together. There was no way Atiku and PDP could have won the election with the party platform under which he contested broken into four parts. If Atiku was not harboring a delusion of grandeur, we wonder how he could have envisaged any possible pathway to victory with Mr. Peter Obi's Labour Party, Dr. Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso's NNPP and PDP G-5 Governors who took away possible PDP votes, while the APC went into the election as a strong, viable and unified entity.

Alhaji Atiku Abubakar claims he loves Nigeria and embraces “integrity” so much. We found such claim to be sheer hypocrisy as Atiku remains one of the worst examples of kleptocracy in Africa. The US Congress lists Atiku’s money laundering as one of the very rare cases of corruption at the highest level of governance in the world.

His avarice sent congressman William Jefferson to jail after the FBI busted a bribery scandal in which Atiku was involved from head to toe and for which he was marked down by the U.S. agency.

Now as we get to the proper business of governance after Atiku’s unwarranted distraction, we have picked some clear lessons going forward. One is that our institutions must be strengthened on diligent and sturdy wings, enough to withstand and identify from afar rabble-rousers who masquerade as statesmen.

Second, our institutions must also ensure that corrupt, desperate, self-serving serial losers should not have a space in our democracy. Because if they don’t win the battle, they might burn the nation.

We want to advise Atiku that after over three decades of elusive bid for the Presidency of Nigeria, he must now end his unprofitable bid and go away from any venture that will further pollute the political atmosphere and national harmony.

Bayo Onanuga

Special Adviser to the President on Information & Strategy

October 30, 2023

NLC/TUC STRIKE, IN WHO’S INTEREST?Barring last minute change of decision by the organized labour unions in obeisance to ...
01/10/2023

NLC/TUC STRIKE, IN WHO’S INTEREST?

Barring last minute change of decision by the organized labour unions in obeisance to the restraining court ruling on its strike, the Nigeria society from the 3rd of October 2023 might witness another round of industrial unrest as championed by the NLC/TUC arising from their national executive council meeting, in reaction to the federal government response to the aftermath of the fuel subsidy removal on the Nigerian worker.

Before we proceed in this exercise, it is important for us to situate the issues in proper perspectives for understanding and clarity of purpose. However, in doing so, one is not oblivious of the fact that sentiments and emotions might becloud the reasoning of some persons whose only idea of objectivity, truth and pro people, is if one takes or support positions against government actions or policies in the absence of rationality, fact and logic. Nevertheless, we are unmoved and cannot be cowed from expressing our views on national issues which is a fundamental human right, no matter whose ox is gored.

On the issue of fuel subsidy removal, it's an indisputable fact that Nigerians are collectively on the same page over the removal of this virus that has ravaged the Nigerian economy to our collective detriment and which must be exterminated to allow the economy and Nigerians breathe.

It is not in doubt that strike action by labour unions is one of the legitimate instruments employed to ventilate its grievances to employers or government over work conditions. From that premise, the resort to strike is a legitimate and fundamental right of the worker or workers which is indisputable and non-negotiable.

In addition, an indisputable truism is that strike action is a serious business that ought to be employed as a last resort and must not be turned into a blackmailing tool, else it becomes trivialized and loses its cherished import.

As regards the threatened latest round of strike by the organized labour, the question that should bother any discerning mind, is in whose interest is this strike?

One recollects that immediately after the presidential pronouncement of the removal of fuel subsidy, Mr. President also made a public announcement of the need to effect a positive change in the welfare of the Nigerian worker in line with economic reality and to put in place measures to ameliorate the conditions of not only the working class but the generality of Nigerians in the immediate and long term through the retooling of the economy for national prosperity.

Thus, following the removal of fuel subsidy and the attendant economic distortions, the federal government constituted a committee comprising representatives of the federal and states governments, the organized private sector and the organized labour to come up with recommendations on the way forward with regards to the economic conditions of the working class population.

Even while the constituted committee was work in progress, we are all living witnesses to the palliatives programmes of states governments like Kwara, Ogun, Edo, Lagos, Bornu, Oyo, etc who came up with policies such as reducing the official working days from 5 to 3, award of N10, 000 per month to workers, reduction of transport fares in BRT buses, purchase and deployment of mass transit buses at subsidized boarding costs among other relief measures to cushion the impact of the fuel subsidy removal.

In the midst of the economic dislocation and inconvenience caused by the removal of fuel subsidy which was expected and affecting all strata of the society, as a way forward, the federal government relinquished and decentralized some aspects of the distribution of the relief measures or palliatives to states governments and it's a fact, that we are living witnesses to the distribution of the palliatives in some states of which we have seen reportage in the media, but in some others, we are in the dark about what is being done, but it is expected that in due course, all the states governments will be made to render account of stewardship in this regard.

One must also add that in Lagos State, where yours sincerely lives, one has experienced as an eye witness, distribution of palliatives not only by the state government, but also by local government council and local development council areas administrations.

Even as Nigerians battle the economic hardship which is a global phenomenon, the organized labour at every turn of its engagement with the federal government on the aftermath of the removal of fuel subsidy, threatened going on strike, went on a one day strike and rally and later, on a 2 days strike and public rally to ventilate it's anger over the plight of workers and it's disapproval of government response to the issue of the palliatives and other matters.

However, an aspect of the labour statement on why it is going on strike is its claim that it's action is because of the suffering of the generality of the Nigerian people over the removal of fuel subsidy, which needs to be examined to determine the truth.

This statement in view of our present economic circumstances looks more like an attempt to pull wool over the eyes of Nigerians who have become traumatized by the broken record threat of strike by the organized labour at the slightest opportunity. That the Nigerian people are going through a lot because of the economic hardship is not in doubt, but the present situation though painful, is one in which the people have exhibited patience and understanding and are only looking for relief rather than the pains which the proposed strike portends.

So one wonders why the organized labour is trying to deflect from the truth that the primary focus of its present agitations at the federal level is the interest of federal workers which is legitimate and in order? In sincerity, one might be safe to assume that workers at the state and local government levels don't need to be part of this strike, because some of the palliatives which the federal workers are clamouring for through the organized labour, is already being enjoyed in the states even by the federal workers too, save for wage issues which is a national matter and is already being looked into by the tripartite committee.

But this is not to assert that the society as a whole has not benefitted from the struggles of the organized labour in the past, absolutely not. Infact, we must commend the organized labour for its sacrificial role in nation building which is indelible and must continue to constructively engage with this institution of national unity for our collective benefits.

But on this planned strike, we must affirm that it is not in the best interest of the generality of the Nigerian people and her economy that will be at the receiving end of this action. At the moment, over 80% of our working population are in the informal sector where they live on daily earnings, without which, it will be economic catastrophe and so we ask, how will the interest of this mass of our population and their dependents be ameliorated by an indefinite strike? Also if workers go on strike, the economy that is being retooled for optimal governmental responsibility will be deprived of the expected returns of the retooling process for the good of the people.

As at the last count, the organized labour went on a 2 days warning strike between September 5th and 6th 2023, the effect of that strike on individuals, businesses and the economy was incalculably in the negative in all ramifications.

If the ideals of labour is to create wealth for a better and prosperous society for all, then the planned indefinite strike needs to be rethinked, shelved and the federal government given more time to engage with labour on all the issues.

Therefore, without doubt, the proposed indefinite strike by NLC/TUC is not in the interest of Nigerians and Nigerian workers.

God bless the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

Thank you.

Yours Sincerely,

E-signed,

Nelson Ekujumi,
[email protected]

Address


Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The Focus posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to The Focus:

Videos

Shortcuts

  • Address
  • Telephone
  • Alerts
  • Contact The Business
  • Videos
  • Claim ownership or report listing
  • Want your business to be the top-listed Media Company?

Share