10/07/2023
UNIUYO DISOWNS OBA'S STAR WITNESS, SAYS HE MISLED THE COURT WITH FORGED DOCUMENTS
…UWEM OKOKO CONFIRMS INEC RESULT TALLIED WITH UNIT RESULTS FROM PDP ACCREDITED AGENTS
A Director of Human Resources with the University of Uyo, Mr. Linus Okoko has established that a petitioner star witness, one Daniel Edet Akpan recently paraded by the YPP and its Governorship candidate, Senator Bassey Albert to testify before the Governorship Election Petitions Tribunal sitting in Uyo, claiming to be an Administrative Officer with the University is a actually an impostor, who should be made to face the full weight of the law, as the institution has no such name on its nominal roll.
Testifying, Monday at the tribunal, Mr. Okoko told the court that there is also no Faculty of Environmental Sciences in the University of Uyo, but Faculty of Environmental Studies, contrary to the claims by the said impostor. He also told the tribunal that all the documents paraded by OBA's star witness never emanated from the University of Uyo, as they are all forged documents.
He also revealed that the said Daniel’s letter of appointments and letter of promotion, which he tendered before the court on the day he testified are also forged.
Mr. Linus Okoko also hinted that the staff number cited by Daniel Edet Akpan as his, actually belongs to Mrs. Theresa Inokon, a staff of the Security Directorate of the University, while the reference number on the Promotion Letter he provided belongs to Mr. Nse Okon Udoh, an Environmental Officer in the Directorate of Security Service.
“I have conducted a thorough search on the University staff records. My Lord, I have produced the staff records of the University that were required by the court, I discovered that his letter of appointment as Clerical Officer is also forged. All documents tendered by Daniel Edet did not emanate from the University of Uyo".
“Its not possible not to know the head of department where you are working. If you don't know any other person, you must know the name of your boss whom you are working under”.
“The Man(Daniel Edet Akpan) is a forger. The University doesn’t address letters to staff with their village addresses, but their faculties and department.,” he said after being shown Daniel’s supposed promotion letter.
“There is no way two people can have same staff number. If I had seen the said Daniel Edet Akpan the day he came here as a witness to the Petitioner, I would have ensured he is arrested. He is an impostor.”
Testifying earlier, the State Collation Agent for the 3rd respondent in the Akwa Ibom Gubernatorial election, Engr. Uwem Okoko told the tribunal that the results declared by the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC as final result of the Governorship election in the State, were a true reflection of what transpired at the polling units across the State.
He maintained that the result were genuine, and that his party, the PDP is well grounded across the State.
Engr. Okoko who voted at his polling unit Ikot Essien Village in Ikot Abasi on the day of election, said upon conclusion of voting at his unit, he had also monitored the conduct at other locations, saying it was peaceful and orderly and that his party, the PDP is a well structured political party from the unit to ward and to local government level.
“In all the units I visited, there was orderly and peaceful conduct of election, and the result that was declared were a true reflection of what transpired”.
As contained in his witness statement, Okoko tendered results sheets local government by local government, as received by the agents of his political party from all parts of the State.
The results included polling unit results, wards and local government results from each of the 31 local government areas of Akwa Ibom State.
Counsel to Petitioners, Tunde Olaola, worried that such evidence is being received tells the court that the witness did not plead Form EC8A in his written statement.
Tayo Oyetibo however pointed out in the witness statement of Engr Okoko, where he mentioned Form EC8A and other forms he received from his party agents.
Not satisfied, Tunde fires on that his witness was not allowed to also tender some documents previously, but Tayo Oyetibo had to explain to him how the background to the tying of results to respective polling units, was established by his witness in his statement.
The tribunal overruled the apparently inexperienced young YPP Counsel and coached him that there is a clear difference between dumping of documents which has attempted to do, and identifying of documents as the PDP was doing.