Yusra Alexander

Yusra Alexander If you never try, you will never know

Antarctica mysteries to be mapped by robot planeA team of scientists and engineers have landed in Antarctica to test a d...
06/02/2024

Antarctica mysteries to be mapped by robot plane

A team of scientists and engineers have landed in Antarctica to test a drone that will help experts forecast the impacts of climate change.
The autonomous plane will map areas of the continent that have been out of bounds to researchers.
It has been put to the test in extreme weather around Wales' highest peaks.
Its first experiment will survey the mountains under an ice sheet to predict how quickly the ice could melt and feed into global sea-level rise.
Scientists want to understand Antarctica better but they are limited by the existing technology.
Strong winds, below-freezing temperatures and sudden storms are common. These dangerous conditions, as well as dark winters and the need to transport pilots and large amounts of fuel, put limitations on use of traditional crewed planes.

The British Antarctic Survey developed the new drone with UK company Windracers to be easily repaired if something goes wrong.
The drone was tested in Llanbedr, Eryri (also called Snowdonia) in north Wales - a stand-in for the difficult weather and terrain of Antarctica.
During a practice run in strong winds with rain lashing the airfield, engineer Rebecca Toomey explained that the drone can fly to remote areas without concerns for pilots' safety.
It can carry 100kg of cargo up to 1,000km. Instruments including radar and cameras are loaded in the back of the drone and on its wings. Its route is programmed in and an engineer monitors the flight from a computer.
Rebecca will operate the drone from Rothera base in Antarctica, but eventually the British Antarctic Survey hope to fly it from the UK.
It also uses much less fuel than traditional planes - 10 barrels compared to 200 on one research flight - reducing the environmental impact of scientific research on the planet.

The data it collects will be processed at the British Antarctic Survey headquarters in Cambridge.
Scientist Tom Jordan explains that some of it will feed into a model of the continent called BEDMAP2 that shows the complex shape of the land under the ice.
Drawing a question mark over parts of the map, he explains that large areas of Antarctica are still unmapped because no-one has ever been able to get there.
"You can see the mountain ridge under the ice here and here. Does that continue across? Are parts under sea level? I don't know," he says.
"This survey work is really exciting because it's a proper blank in the map."
Antarctica's vast ice covers huge mountains ranges - some the size of the European Alps - and trenches and valleys. Some areas are below sea level.

It is vital that scientists understand this topography because it determines how quickly the ice will melt.
An ice sheet exposed to warming waters will probably melt more quickly. But if complex mountains block its path, it will decline slower, Tom says.
In its first experiment, radar on the drone will fire radio waves at an ice sheet called Fuchs Piedmont. Some will go into the ice sheet, hit the ground at the base and bounce back. The drone will listen for those reflections and use them to draw the shape of the land.
"It builds up this picture - going line by line. This is another thing that drones are great for - doing things that are really boring," he explains.
Current models of global sea-level rise from melting ice sheets have wide margins, but with a better understanding of Antarctica's topography, Tom says scientists can make more accurate predictions.
"That will help us plan the future," he says.
The first flights will be in the next few weeks. Other experiments include surveys of marine life like krill, which are a vital part of the food chain, and surveys of environmentally sensitive areas.

Amazon's record drought driven by climate changeOne of our planet's most vital defences against global warming is itself...
25/01/2024

Amazon's record drought driven by climate change

One of our planet's most vital defences against global warming is itself being ravaged by climate change.
It was the main driver of the Amazon rainforest's worst drought in at least half a century, according to a new study.
Often described as the "lungs of the planet", the Amazon plays a key role in removing warming carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
But rapid deforestation has left it more vulnerable to weather extremes.
While droughts in the Amazon are not uncommon, last year's event was "exceptional", the researchers say.
In October, the Rio Negro - one of the world's largest rivers - reached its lowest recorded level near Manaus in Brazil, surpassing marks going back over 100 years.

As well as being a buffer against climate change, the Amazon is a rich source of biodiversity, containing around 10% of the world's species - with many more yet to be discovered.
The drought has disrupted ecosystems and has directly impacted millions of people who rely on rivers for transport, food and income, with the most vulnerable hit hardest.
One trigger for these dry conditions is El Niño - a natural weather system where sea surface temperatures increase in the East Pacific Ocean. This affects global rainfall patterns, particularly in South America.
But human-caused climate change was the main driver of the extreme drought, according to the World Weather Attribution group, reducing the amount of water in the soil in two main ways.

Firstly, the Amazon is typically receiving less rainfall than it used to between June and November - the drier part of the year - as the climate warms.
Secondly, hotter temperatures mean there's more evaporation from the plants and soils, so they lose more water.

The researchers used weather data and computer simulations to compare drought conditions in two scenarios: one with human-caused warming, and one without.
In a world where humans hadn't heated up the planet by around 1.2C, such an intense 'agricultural drought' - where a lack of rainfall and high evaporation dry out the soils - may only have happened around once every 1,500 years, the study suggests.
Climate change has made a drought of this severity around 30 times more likely, according to the researchers, and one is now expected to happen every 50 years under current conditions.
"This really is something quite exceptional," says Dr Ben Clarke, a researcher with the World Weather Attribution group.
As the map below shows, drought hit almost all of the Amazon basin. This scale - and intensity - makes it different to previous droughts, Dr Clarke told BBC News.
And if warming continues, such extreme droughts could become even more common.

"If we continue burning oil, gas and coal, very soon, we'll reach 2C of warming and we'll see similar Amazon droughts about once every 13 years," says Dr Friederike Otto, a senior lecturer in climate science at Imperial College London.
More frequent and intense droughts test the Amazon's resilience. That has already been stretched by deforestation - around one-fifth of the rainforest has been lost over the last 50 years.
Trees help the area retain and release moisture, fuelling their own clouds, and they also help to cool temperatures.
While the effect of deforestation was not directly tested in this latest study, previous research has shown it increases the vulnerability of the rainforest to drought.
Lungs of the planet
The world's largest rainforest is seen as crucial in the battle to limit global warming.
"The Amazon could make or break our fight against climate change," says Regina Rodrigues, a professor of physical oceanography and climate at the Federal University of Santa Catarina in Brazil.
In a healthy state, it takes up more carbon dioxide (CO2) than it releases.
This limits CO2 increases in the atmosphere from human activities, keeping a lid on temperatures.
But there is evidence that this may be changing, as trees die back due to drought, wildfires and deliberate clearance to make room for agriculture.
There is concern that if climate change and deforestation continue at their current pace, the Amazon could soon reach a "tipping point".
If crossed, this could lead to the rapid and irreversible dieback of the whole rainforest - potentially leading to the region becoming a significant source of CO2 emissions.
It's not known exactly where such a threshold might sit.
"I don't think that [tipping point] is what we are seeing [yet], at least in all but the driest part of the Amazon forest," says Yadvinder Malhi, a professor of ecosystem science at the University of Oxford, who was not involved in the latest study.
Despite the latest record drought, there has been some encouraging progress.
The rate of deforestation fell in 2023 compared with the year before, according to the Brazilian space agency, with President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva pledging to halt it completely by 2030.

This - alongside urgent action to slash the greenhouse gas emissions that are fuelling global warming - can still help to protect what's left of the Amazon, researchers say.
"The loss of the Amazon forest is far from inevitable in the short-term," as long as fire and deforestation can be controlled, Prof Malhi told BBC News.
"But we do need to get to grips with stabilising global climate, as the risk increases with every fraction of a degree the planet warms."

UK government plans further nuclear power expansionThe government is exploring plans to build a new large-scale nuclear ...
17/01/2024

UK government plans further nuclear power expansion

The government is exploring plans to build a new large-scale nuclear plant, despite concerns about delays to existing projects.
Ministers say the project would be the biggest expansion of the sector in 70 years, reducing reliance on overseas supply.
The new plant would quadruple energy supplies by 2050, they say.
But concerns have been raised, with existing nuclear projects already behind schedule and over-budget.
The government's Civil Nuclear Roadmap is intended to bolster the UK's energy independence by exploring a new site for another nuclear power station of the size and scale of the £30bn plants under construction at Hinkley Point in Somerset and committed to Sizewell in Suffolk.
Industry sources have told the BBC the leading candidates would include Wylfa on Anglesey or Moorside in Cumbria.

Thursday's announcement also pledged £300m to produce nuclear reactor fuel in the UK, currently only commercially produced in Russia, which it said would lower bills and improve energy security.
But recent nuclear projects have been beset by delays, cost overruns and in the case of Sizewell C, continuing local opposition.
In total, the government has now earmarked more than £1bn for the Sizewell C project, building on its original £700m stake as part of its plan to rapidly expand the UK's nuclear energy sector.
The Association for Renewable Energy and Clean Technology (REA) said all clean energy needed fast-tracking.
Nuclear power currently provides around 15% of the UK's electricity but many of the country's ageing reactors are due to be decommissioned over the next decade.

'Dragging their feet'
Progress can be slow - to get from planning to "power on" can take nearly 20 years. Consultations for Sizewell took 10 years alone.
The majority of construction there is yet to start and strong local opposition to the project remains.
The government will hope to address such problems by streamlining the development of new power stations. By introducing smarter regulation it anticipates it will be able to deliver new nuclear power plants faster.
Jack Abbott, an expert in the clean energy sector, who is also a Labour candidate in the neighbouring constituency to Sizewell, said the government had been "dragging their feet" on nuclear for too long.
"Fourteen years and not one new site opened, despite inheriting 10 approved sites from the last Labour government. Labour supports expanding the UK's nuclear power fleet, which must form a critical part of our future energy mix," Mr Abbott said.
The REA is also sceptical. It said the government had been exploring a new private-led nuclear plant for years. However, the association did commend the government on its plans to commit £300m to produce reactor fuel in the UK.
Policy director Frank Gordon added: "We need to accelerate the deployment of all clean energy sources, especially renewable power from diverse sources, plus supporting the roll-out of the much-needed clean technologies, energy storage working at all scales and duration."

But the government said the plans would also support thousands of jobs, as well as "pushing Putin out of the global market" to provide a quarter of the UK's electricity needs.
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said nuclear was the "perfect antidote to the energy challenges facing Britain".
Of the two consultations being published on Thursday one will focus on "a new approach" to siting future nuclear power stations, empowering developers to find suitable locations. The other will lead on encouraging private investment.
"Community engagement will remain critical to any decisions, alongside maintaining robust criteria such as nearby population densities," the government said.
Tom Greatrex, chief executive of the Nuclear Industry Association, welcomed the publication of the roadmap and streamlined regulation but said the UK needed to develop both large and small nuclear generation "at scale and at pace".

UK weather: 2023 was second warmest year on record, says Met OfficeLast year was the UK's second warmest on record, acco...
04/01/2024

UK weather: 2023 was second warmest year on record, says Met Office

Last year was the UK's second warmest on record, according to provisional data from the Met Office.
This puts it just behind 2022, which recorded an average temperature of only 0.06C higher.
For both Wales and Northern Ireland, 2023 was their hottest year on record.
The national weather service said climate change has made the high temperatures "significantly more likely".
Met Office Senior Scientist Mike Kendon said: "The observations of the UK climate are clear. Climate change is influencing UK temperature records over the long term, with 2023 going down as another very warm year.
"While our climate will remain variable, with periods of cold and wet weather, what we have observed over recent decades is a number of high temperature records tumbling."

The summer in the UK was bookended by the hottest June and joint hottest September on record, with temperatures reaching over 33C.
The UK has some of the oldest temperature records in the world. The Central England Temperature series kept by the Met Office goes back to 1659.
Despite successive hottest years on record the government was warned in July of leaving the UK unprepared for climate change, by its own advisors. In 2022, around 3,000 more deaths than average in the over-65s were reported and 20% of operations were cancelled
On Tuesday, Doug Parr, Greenpeace UK's policy director, said that the recent actions of Prime Minister Rishi Sunak on climate change will only worsen the impact.
"Climate alarm bells are ringing, but Sunak has his fingers in his ears. "Our Prime Minister's newest plans consist of ramping up oil and gas drilling in the North Sea and delaying key policies that would slash emissions from cars and housing - or scrapping them altogether."
A government spokesperson said: "We are committed to tackling climate change by meeting our net zero targets and international commitments, all without placing undue burdens on families."

Average rainfall last year was also up, by 11% across the UK, but by more than 20% in England and Northern Ireland.
Scientists predict the UK will experience hotter, drier summers and warmer, wetter winters due to climate change. As the air warms up it is able to hold more moisture, resulting in increased rainfall.
The record temperatures in the UK were also seen across the world. There were wildfires in Greece, Tunisia and Hawaii, historically high sea temperatures in the Atlantic, a record wildfire season in Canada and worrying lows in Antarctic sea-ice.
In January, the Copernicus Climate Change Service is expected to confirm that 2023 was the hottest year globally. The above average temperatures have been likely driven in large part by climate change but also by the natural weather phenomenon El Niño.
During an El Niño event, winds in the eastern Pacific weaken, keeping warm waters closer to the surface and sending them eastwards. This releases more heat into the atmosphere, creating warmer and wetter air.
It is not known for sure how long the El Niño will last but it is expected it will run through the first half of this year. This will likely also make 2024 the world's hottest on record, and push the world past the key 1.5C warming milestone.

Hitting the threshold would mean the world is 1.5C warmer on average than it was during the late 1800s, when fossil fuel emissions from industrialisation really began to ramp up.
The 1.5C figure has become a symbol of global climate change negotiations. Countries agreed to "pursue efforts" to limit global temperature rises to 1.5C under the 2015 Paris agreement.

Examining COP28's potential impact on climate changeOnce the gavel came down in Dubai, the warm words flowed - but will ...
18/12/2023

Examining COP28's potential impact on climate change

Once the gavel came down in Dubai, the warm words flowed - but will it really have an impact on climate change?
The agreement reached in this glitzy metropolis for the first time nails the role of fossil fuel emissions in driving up temperatures and outlines a future decline for coal, oil and gas.
In UN terms that is historic, and the biggest step forward on climate since the Paris agreement in 2015.
But by itself, will this deal be enough to save the "north star" of this COP - keeping temperatures under 1.5C this century?
Most likely not.
The major element of the deal, the transition away from fossil fuels in energy systems, is indeed a landmark moment.

But the language is far weaker than many countries desired.
The UAE presidency had included strong text on the idea of a fossil fuel phase out from the start of the meeting.
But in the face of opposition from many, they dropped it from their first attempt at a draft agreement,
Cue fury among progressives and much finger pointing at oil producers.
This wasn't all the fault of countries like Saudi Arabia.
A key factor in softening the text was the attitude of middle-income developing countries who were very uncertain about the much hyped phased out of fossil fuels.

For Nigeria, Uganda, Colombia and others there were complaints that they needed to use revenues from the sale of coal, oil and gas to ensure they could pay for the transition to greener energy.
Colombia complained that by moving away from fossil fuels, credit agencies had downgraded their rating, meaning that international loans to go green would cost them far more.
The final pact now calls on countries to "transition away" from fossil fuels specifically for energy systems, but not for plastics, transport or agriculture.
The agreement also has many other elements that will help limit emissions including a new commitment to triple renewables and energy efficiency by 2030.
This will see wind and solar displace some coal, oil and gas.
Another important factor is the requirement for countries to submit stronger carbon cutting plans by 2025.

If China and India put a rapid transition to green energy at the heart of these new commitments, that could make a massive difference to the global effort.
But there is also a recognition of the role of "transitional fuels" in the agreement - which is UN code for continuing use of natural gas.
There is also support for the use of carbon capture and storage, a technology that oil producers want to use to continue drilling.
Small island states were also irate that the deal was gavelled through while they weren't in the room.
They see the lack of greater short-term emissions cuts as the key weakness that threatens their way of life.
"We feel you, we see you. And we see that this text might not be enough for you, or your children," said German foreign minister Annalena Baerbock.
She said the deal in Dubai is just a starting point - and I think that is an important takeaway.
Observers here believe that this meeting and the next two COPs, in Azerbaijan and Brazil, are part of a package deal that will help the world correct course on climate.
The view is that with the cost of renewables continuing to fall, the pressure on fossil fuels will continue to grow.
The feeling here is that in 2025, Brazil's President Lula will have chance to put fossil fuels beyond the pale, for ever.

Americans have specific expectations for their cars. Do EVs need to evolve to meet their demands – or are consumers' per...
11/12/2023

Americans have specific expectations for their cars. Do EVs need to evolve to meet their demands – or are consumers' perceptions miscalibrated?

While electric vehicle sales in the United States are rising, demand has slowed. According to a July 2023 Pew Research Center survey, half of Americans say they're unlikely to consider an EV, and 13% are sure they don't want one. In fact, according to the report, the share of the public interested in purchasing an EV is down 4% from May 2022.
Analysts point to affordability issues and lack of confidence in charging infrastructure as the main drivers, but car manufacturers also face another challenge to convince consumers to ditch the combustion engine: US drivers don't believe a new electric auto could be a wholesale replacement for their current car.
It's not that Americans are opposed to EVs, per se – it's rather that an overwhelming swath of consumers want EVs that can take them as far on a single charge as they can get on a tank of gas. And in a country where the top-selling vehicles are pickup trucks and large SUVs, buyers are less likely to downsize to go electric.
Right now, says Chris Hopson, a principal analyst at S&P Global Mobility, for most consumers switching to an EV would mean a change of lifestyle. It's a switch many seem unwilling to make. "Beyond affordability, the next thing is, 'I want my lifestyle not to change because of my vehicle'," he says.
A demand for road-trip readiness
Driving range is among the biggest sticking points Americans cite for their EV-buying hesitancy: a May 2023 Bloomberg survey showed American drivers want their EV to go at least 300 miles (482km) on a single charge, and fewer than 10% would settle for a car that couldn't go at least 200 miles (322km).
While EV range has more than doubled since the first vehicles were introduced over a decade ago, most have not hit that 300 miles benchmark. And even EVs that tout a possible range above 250 miles (402km) may not actually get that far in practice. Things like using heat or air conditioning, driving in rain or into a headwind, driving at higher speeds or sitting in stop-and-go traffic can all considerably reduce that range.
The fixation on mileage may be misplaced, however, given Americans don't actually tend to go all that far when they get behind the wheel. A 2022 study from the US Bureau of Transportation Statistics showed more than half of all daily trips – by any mode of transportation – were fewer than 3 miles (4.8km). In fact, only 2% were longer than 50 miles (80.4km).
Perhaps the idea of the open road is too strong to compel drivers to settle: even if most travel is just around town, Americans want to know they could set out on an epic road trip if they wanted.
Hopson also points to lack of consumer confidence in charging. Charger infrastructure and dependability has lagged, and Hopson says Americans would rather know their vehicle can do several hundred miles at a time than risk being stranded.
"If you don't have home charging," he says, "there's issues around road trips, and how to charge, where to charge or when to charge." Buyers may simply be waiting, he says, "for the next generation of batteries that are all quick-charging", or for charging infrastructure that guarantees a working charger at least every 200 miles or so.
A recent S&P analysis showed that among people who do make the switch to an EV, some feel considerable disappointment. The survey – which did not include the drivers of Telsas, which dominate the market ­– showed nearly half of households who own a non-Tesla EV decide to buy a gas-powered car next.
Bigger's still better
On Car and Driver's 2022 list of the best-selling vehicles in the United States, half of the top ten – including spots one and two – were large pick-up trucks. The popularity of trucks and large SUVs has remained steady in the United States, and EV options in those segments remain limited. The ones that have hit the market have come with some considerable drawbacks.
"They've created [some] electric vehicles and said, 'you can do 350 miles in this, you can go off-roading, it's as big a vehicle as you want and you can fit this many people in it'," says Hopson. "The technology is a wonderment, but the engineering means the battery has to be this big, it has to weigh this much and the cost is this much. The reality is they're just guzzling in a different way, from an energy perspective."
The most noable example of this may be GM's reissue of the Hummer, a large SUV that was discontinued in its combustion-engine iteration, in 2010. The new EV version, which claims a range up to 381 miles (613km), weighs nearly 10,000lbs (4,539kg). The battery alone weighs as much as an entire Toyota Corolla.
Between the lithium needed to power the battery and the energy grid use to charge it, non-profit research group American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy found that the Hummer EV emits as much or more greenhouse gas as a standard-sized sedan.
While other larger EVs, like Ford's F-150 Lightning electric pickup truck, showed early promise and popularity, sales have slowed to a crawl as consumers find that using an EV truck the way they use a gas or diesel-powered one – towing, for instance – can cut the truck's range by a third or more.
Many Americans are simply waiting for a better EV option in the truck or vehicle category, or perhaps waiting for a certain manufacturer to release an EV version of a specific model, says Russell Hensley, co-lead of the Center for Future Mobility in the Americas at consulting firm McKinsey & Company. "You haven't got the full suite of vehicle choice at this point," he says. And in the meantime, a big "percentage are thinking, well, we'll just take one more internal combustion engine before we pivot".
A wave of change on the horizon
Whether or not cars that check Americans' boxes eventually enter the market, adoption will eventually rise, says Hensley, and EVs will take over. The wave of change is coming, he says, and generational differences when it comes to embracing that wave are unignorable.
In a recent McKinsey and Co survey, millennials – respondents between the ages of 25 and 40 – said they were three times as likely as Baby Boomers (people older than 56) to switch car brands for something that offered better connectivity, and seven-times as likely to switch for better autonomous driving features.
Essentially, says Hensley, the results speak to Baby Boomers' resistance to change, and unwillingness to let brand new technology alter their lifestyle, especially compared to younger people. "I think there is a fundamental difference there just in terms of expectations out of a vehicle," he says.
Younger consumers, on the other hand, are more open to a paradigm shift in the way they think about driving. In other words, they might not expect an EV to do everything a gas-powered car can do. They might be open, instead, to shaping their lives around the tech, rather than expecting the tech to fit their existing lifestyle.
"Right now, the people who can most easily go out and buy an EV," says Hensley, referring to the Baby Boomers, who currently control 70% of the disposable income in the US, "are the ones with the least willingness to change".
Of course, that won't always be the case. As the buying power of millennials and younger generations grows, EV market share will too, he says. The big unanswered question, he adds, is whether it's really the cars that need to evolve in the meantime, or Americans' expectations.
"Let's say you get to the point where you can have all the attributes that you've had historically with an internal combustion engine," he says. "The question becomes more whether you actually need them, or whether you begin to change your behaviour."

COP28: UN climate talks go big on ending fossil fuelsCountries and oil companies at the UN climate talks have promised t...
05/12/2023

COP28: UN climate talks go big on ending fossil fuels

Countries and oil companies at the UN climate talks have promised to make major progress in tackling global warming in a large new energy pledge.
Around 100 countries promised to treble world renewable energy use by 2030.
And 50 oil and gas companies including Saudi giant Aramco pledged to stop adding to planet-warming gases by 2050.
That only covers emissions from production, not the burning of fossil fuels and critics said it would not meaningfully tackle climate change.
But countries pledging to triple renewable energy at the COP28 summit in Dubai said it would help remove fossil fuels from the world's energy system by 2050 at the latest.
Supporters, including the EU and COP28 host country the United Arab Emirates (UAE), want the pledge to be included in the final deal made at COP, meaning all of the nearly 200 countries represented here would sign up.

Climate groups cautiously welcomed the promise to ramp up renewables, but said that promises by oil and gas companies were "greenwashing".
"I am very sceptical," said Prof Bill Hare, CEO of Climate Analytics and author of numerous UN climate change reports.
"The real challenge for the oil and gas sector is to move away from producing oil and gas," he said. "Nothing else really matters in the end."

Fatih Birol from the International Energy Agency told BBC News that the fossil fuel industry should reduce its emissions from production by 2030, 20 years earlier than the date promised. They account for around 15% of global emissions - and that's before you even count the gases given off when their products are used to power vehicles and heat homes.
He said it is "facing a moment of truth now in Dubai... Is it going to be partnering with the rest of the world.. Or is it going to stick to their business plans?".
Addressing the summit on Saturday, COP28 President Sultan al-Jaber said the new pledge "adds up to more countries and more companies from more sectors than ever before, all aligning with our North Star of 1.5C".

World leaders agreed in Paris in 2015 to limit global warming to that amount.
Burning huge amounts of oil, gas and coal is driving climate change but leaders cannot yet agree on how fast the world should stop using them.
Mr Jaber called Saturday's pledge "a great first step".
"Whilst many national oil companies have adopted net zero 2050 targets for the first time, I know that they and others, can and need to do more," he said. "We need the entire industry to keep 1.5C within reach and set even stronger ambitions for decarbonisation."
The UAE says the Decarbonisation Charter will speed up climate action as oil and gas companies that account for 40% of the world's emissions promise to become net zero by 2050.
Reaching net zero means stopping adding greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.

Carroll Muffett, president of the Center for International Environmental Law, however, said that the only way to 'decarbonize' carbon-based oil and gas is to stop producing it "quickly, completely, and permanently".
"Anything short of this is just more industry greenwash."
The 50 companies, which also include the UAE's state oil company, also pledge to almost entirely stop releasing the potently planet-heating gas methane during oil and gas production by 2030.

Address

Almaty

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Yusra Alexander posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share


Other Digital creator in Almaty

Show All