The New Horizon Sikkim

The New Horizon Sikkim Dependable,dedicated and determined An independent media house
(1)

The basic idea about creation of this page is to provide information,to be transparent and to be accountable to the people.To give minutes to minutes and to report everything in punctual and actual way.

From Nehru to Modi: The Evolution of Opposition in Indian Democracy;The opposition parties play an essential role in the...
06/06/2024

From Nehru to Modi: The Evolution of Opposition in Indian Democracy;

The opposition parties play an essential role in the democratic framework of any country, and India is no exception. The foundation of a healthy democracy lies in its ability to accommodate diverse voices and dissenting opinions, ensuring that governance is inclusive and accountable. The role of the opposition is particularly challenging in political climates where power is centralized and leaders are idolized. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, one of the principal architects of the Indian Constitution, was a staunch critic of the cult of personality that often surrounds political leaders. He believed that such idolization could undermine the democratic process and inhibit the growth of a true democratic ethos. Ambedkar warned against the dangers of hero-worship in politics, stating, "Bhakti in religion may be a road to the salvation of the soul. But in politics, Bhakti or hero-worship is a sure road to degradation and to eventual dictatorship." This perspective highlights the critical need for an opposition that can challenge the centralization of power and prevent the erosion of democratic values.

Since gaining independence, Indian democracy has been marked by its inclusive nature, where the opposition's role has been both admired and respected. This respect for the opposition was evident from the very beginning. For instance, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, a prominent leader who later became Prime Minister, once reflected on Jawaharlal Nehru's leadership. He remarked, "ऐसा नहीं है कि नेहरू जी से मतभेद नहीं थे। चर्चा के दौरान ये चीजें गंभीर रूप से सामने आती थीं। मैंने एक बार उनसे कह दिया था कि आपका मिला जुला व्यक्तित्व है। आप में चर्चिल भी हैं और चैंबरलेन भी है। वह इस बात पर नाराज नहीं हुए।"(It is not that there were no differences with Nehru Ji. These things used to come up seriously during discussions. Once, I told him that he had a mixed personality. There is both Churchill and Chamberlain in you. He did not get angry at this)." Vajpayee recalled an incident in Parliament where Nehru, despite being the target of fierce criticism, invited him to a party in the evening and praised his performance in the House. Nehru's ability to engage with his critics and appreciate their perspectives highlighted the democratic spirit that he espoused.

Nehru's inclusive approach was further demonstrated when he invited several opposition leaders to join his first Cabinet. Notable among them were Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, a prominent social reformer and jurist, and Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, a respected political leader. This move was not merely symbolic; it was a testament to Nehru's commitment to a government that represented diverse viewpoints. However, the respect for opposition saw a dramatic decline during the Emergency period (1975-1977) under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. Opposition leaders were imprisoned, and civil liberties were curtailed. Atal Bihari Vajpayee famously stated, "जहाँ विरोध और विरोधियों को ग़द्दार मानने का भाव है, वहाँ लोकतंत्र समाप्त होता है और तानाशाही का उदय होता है!" (Where there is a sentiment of considering opposition and opponents as traitors, there democracy ends, and dictatorship rises!). This period was a dark chapter in Indian democracy, highlighting the dangers of suppressing dissent.

In recent years, the role of the opposition has come under scrutiny, particularly since the formation of the Modi government at the Center. The 2024 general elections for the 18th Lok Sabha were particularly notable for the intense competition between the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) and the Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance (INDIA). Despite the NDA managing to secure a victory, the opposition emerged stronger, ensuring that the government does not have an unchecked mandate. The public's decision not to grant any single party a clear majority reflects a desire for balanced governance and accountability. On the eve of June 9, 2024, Narendra Modi is set to take oath for his third consecutive term as Prime Minister. However, this time, the dynamics are different. With a more robust opposition, the government will likely face increased scrutiny and will have to engage more constructively with dissenting voices. This scenario can potentially lead to a more accountable and participatory governance model.

Historically, effective oppositions have played a critical role in shaping government policies and ensuring that the executive remains answerable to the legislature. As former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill once remarked, "The opposition is not only there to oppose, but to propose." This dual role of opposing government policies and proposing alternatives is fundamental to a functioning democracy. Indian history is replete with instances where a vigilant opposition has contributed significantly to the nation's political discourse. The first major instance of a robust opposition can be traced back to the early years post-independence when leaders like Ram Manohar Lohia and J.B. Kripalani provided a strong counter-narrative to the ruling Congress party. Their criticisms were not merely oppositional but were aimed at pushing the government towards more effective governance and social justice.

During the 1970s, the opposition's role became even more pronounced. The emergency period is often cited as a time when the opposition was most needed and, subsequently, most persecuted. Leaders like Jayaprakash Narayan, who spearheaded the Total Revolution movement, galvanized public opinion against the authoritarian tendencies of the Indira Gandhi government. This period underscored the essential role of the opposition in defending democratic principles and civil liberties. In the contemporary context, the Modi government's tenure has been marked by significant political and economic reforms. However, these changes have also sparked considerable debate and controversy. The opposition has been instrumental in highlighting issues such as the impact of demonetization, the implementation of the Goods and Services Tax (GST), and the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. By raising these issues, the opposition has ensured that the government remains responsive to public concerns.

One of the key responsibilities of the opposition is to act as a watchdog, scrutinizing the actions of the government and ensuring transparency. This role becomes even more critical in times of majoritarian rule, where the ruling party enjoys substantial legislative support. A vigilant opposition can prevent the abuse of power and ensure that minority voices are heard. As Mahatma Gandhi once said, "Honest disagreement is often a good sign of progress." Constructive criticism from the opposition can lead to more refined and effective policies. The opposition also plays a vital role in legislative functions. By participating in debates, proposing amendments, and questioning government decisions, the opposition contributes to the law-making process. This ensures that laws are not merely rubber-stamped but are thoroughly debated and scrutinized. The parliamentary system thrives on this dynamic interaction between the ruling party and the opposition.

Former President of India, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, emphasized the importance of a dynamic opposition when he said, "A nation can be successful when it has a vibrant opposition. An opposition that questions and pushes the government to do better." Moreover, the opposition's role is not confined to the legislative arena. It extends to mobilizing public opinion and fostering civic engagement. Through rallies, public meetings, and media interactions, the opposition can highlight issues that may not receive adequate attention from the government. This mobilization can lead to greater public awareness and participation in the democratic process. As Nelson Mandela pointed out, "A critical, independent, and investigative press is the lifeblood of any democracy. The press must be free from state interference." While Mandela referred to the press, the principle equally applies to the opposition in a democratic setup.

The opposition's significance also lies in its ability to present an alternative vision for the country's future. This is crucial for a healthy democracy, as it provides voters with choices and prevents the stagnation of political ideas. The 2024 general elections demonstrated this, with the INDIA bloc presenting a formidable challenge to the NDA by offering alternative policies and perspectives. This competition of ideas is essential for the evolution and progress of any democratic society. In the context of coalition politics, the role of the opposition becomes even more nuanced. Coalition governments, by their nature, require negotiation and compromise. An effective opposition can exploit the fractures within the ruling coalition, holding the government accountable and ensuring that diverse voices within the coalition are represented. This scenario is likely to play out in the current political landscape, where the Modi government, despite its victory, will need to address the concerns and suggestions of the opposition to ensure stable governance.

Looking ahead, the role of the opposition in India is poised to become even more critical. With the advent of new technologies and social media, the opposition has new tools at its disposal to reach out to the public and galvanize support. However, these tools also come with challenges, such as the spread of misinformation and the need for responsible use of digital platforms. As the political landscape evolves, the opposition must adapt to these changes while remaining steadfast in its core responsibilities of accountability, representation, and advocacy. In conclusion, the opposition is an indispensable pillar of democracy. It ensures that the government remains accountable, represents diverse viewpoints, and offers alternative policies for the country's development. Historical and contemporary examples from Indian democracy underscore the importance of a strong and effective opposition. As India moves forward, the role of the opposition will continue to be crucial in shaping the nation's democratic journey. The 2024 elections have set the stage for a more balanced and accountable governance model, and it is up to the opposition to seize this opportunity to strengthen India's democratic fabric. As the new government takes charge, the opposition's vigilance and constructive engagement will be key to ensuring that democracy thrives and the interests of all citizens are safeguarded.

Sushma Swaraj, a respected Indian politician and former External Affairs Minister, emphasized the importance of the opposition's role in a democracy. She once said, "The role of the opposition is not to oppose for the sake of opposition but to act as a vigilant and constructive critic, to ensure that the government works in the best interest of the people." This perspective underscores the essential function of the opposition in maintaining a check on governmental power and ensuring that policies are crafted with the public's best interests in mind. Swaraj's tenure in Indian politics was marked by her ability to engage in constructive criticism while maintaining respect for democratic institutions and processes. She believed that a robust opposition was vital for the health of democracy, as it ensured that the ruling party did not become

The End of an Era: Lessons from the Fall of India's Longest-Serving Chief MinistersIn the annals of Indian politics, the...
05/06/2024

The End of an Era: Lessons from the Fall of India's Longest-Serving Chief Ministers

In the annals of Indian politics, the narratives of Jyoti Basu of West Bengal, Pawan Kumar Chamling of Sikkim, and Naveen Patnaik of Odisha illustrate the complex interplay of leadership, governance, and the phenomenon of anti-incumbency. Despite their towering presence and significant achievements, these leaders were ultimately ousted by the electorate, underscoring the inevitable demand for change in democratic systems. This article delves into their tenures, their achievements, and the eventual downfall, highlighting the lessons learned from their prolonged incumbency.

Jyoti Basu, a stalwart of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), held the position of Chief Minister of West Bengal for an unprecedented 23 years and 137 days, from 1977 to 2000. His administration was marked by significant socio-economic changes, particularly through land reforms that benefited millions of landless farmers and efforts to decentralize power through Panchayati Raj institutions. Basu's tenure brought stability and growth to West Bengal, establishing a legacy of progressive governance. However, his era also saw bureaucratic stagnation and economic challenges, demonstrating the difficulties of maintaining a balance between long-term stability and the need for continuous innovation and reform. Despite his accomplishments, Basu stepped down voluntarily in 2000, paving the way for Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee to succeed him. However, the Left Front's dominance in West Bengal politics eventually waned, culminating in a significant defeat in the 2011 state elections to the Trinamool Congress (TMC) led by Mamata Banerjee. This shift underscored the electorate's fatigue with long-term incumbency and desire for new leadership.

Pawan Kumar Chamling, who served as Chief Minister of Sikkim from 1994 to 2019, holds the record for the longest uninterrupted rule by any Indian Chief Minister, spanning 24 years and 165 days. Under his leadership, Sikkim became a model for organic farming and made notable advancements in education and healthcare. Chamling's rise to power was a significant political shift, as the Sikkim Democratic Front (SDF) ousted the long-serving Nar Bahadur Bhandari of the Sikkim Sangram Parishad (SSP) in 1994. Bhandari's regime faced mounting dissatisfaction due to allegations of corruption and autocratic governance, which Chamling leveraged by promising transparency, development, and inclusivity. Despite these achievements, the SDF faced an existential crisis in 2019 as the electorate turned to Prem Singh Tamang (P.S. Golay) of the Sikkim Krantikari Morcha (SKM). Further compounding the party's decline, several loyal members defected to the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which previously had no significant presence in Sikkim. By 2024, Chamling was the lone SDF MLA, a stark contrast to the party's former dominance, highlighting the vulnerabilities of a party overly reliant on a single leader.

Naveen Patnaik's tenure in Odisha spanned 24 years and 76 days, ending on June 4, 2024, when he was voted out in the state elections. Patnaik's rule was characterized by significant developmental strides and effective disaster management, earning him widespread popularity. His government’s welfare schemes and disaster management efforts were widely appreciated, contributing to his long-standing incumbency. However, despite his significant popularity, issues such as unemployment, rural distress, and allegations of corruption began to overshadow his achievements. The electorate, yearning for change and fresh leadership, opted for a new direction. Patnaik’s defeat underscores the phenomenon of anti-incumbency, where prolonged incumbency can lead to complacency and voter fatigue. The lesson here is the importance of continuous introspection, reform, and adaptability for political parties and leaders to remain responsive to the electorate’s evolving needs.

The fall of these leaders offers critical lessons for political parties. Long-term governance can bring stability and development but also risks stagnation and voter fatigue. Anti-incumbency reflects the electorate's desire for change and fresh perspectives, necessitating continuous introspection and adaptability from political parties. The experiences of Basu, Chamling, and Patnaik underscore the importance of fostering internal democracy, cultivating new leadership, and addressing contemporary challenges effectively. Over-reliance on a single leader can stifle innovation and responsiveness, making it imperative for parties to embrace more democratic structures and remain connected with the grassroots.

For the Communist Party of India (Marxist), the Sikkim Democratic Front, and the Biju Janata Dal, the road to revival lies in embracing these lessons. By promoting young and dynamic leaders, implementing policies that address current issues, and maintaining internal cohesion, these parties can regain the trust and support of the people. The legacies of Basu, Chamling, and Patnaik, while significant, also serve as cautionary tales about the perils of prolonged incumbency. Their stories highlight the dynamic nature of political power and the necessity of adaptability in sustaining democratic governance. The electorate’s demand for change, fresh leadership, and innovative solutions continues to shape the political landscape, ensuring that democracy remains vibrant and responsive to the needs of the people.

These narratives reflect the dynamic nature of Indian politics and the enduring demand for accountability and innovation. While long-term leadership can drive significant development and stability, it also necessitates constant vigilance against complacency and the pressures of anti-incumbency. The political careers of Basu, Chamling, and Patnaik highlight that the essence of democracy lies in its ability to adapt and renew itself, ensuring that the voices of the electorate continue to steer the course of governance. Their legacies, while marked by significant achievements, also remind political parties and leaders of the importance of continuous engagement, reform, and the nurturing of new leadership to meet the ever-evolving aspirations of the people.



Sikkim Express Sikkim Chronicle Albert Gurung Summit Times Sikkim Democratic Front (SDF) Indian Express CMO Odisha The Times of India The Lallantop North East Web Shots EastMojo

Citizen Amendment Act 2019 likely to be implemented by this week or most probably by the next week. Will it be implement...
29/01/2024

Citizen Amendment Act 2019 likely to be implemented by this week or most probably by the next week. Will it be implemented in Sikkim????

The CAA provides citizenship on the basis of religion to six undocumented non-Muslim communities (Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians) from Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh who entered India on or before 31st December, 2014.
It exempts the members of the six communities from any criminal case under the Foreigners Act, 1946 and the Passport Act, 1920.
The two Acts specify punishment for entering the country illegally and staying here on expired visas and permits.

A media report said the rules for the Citizenship (Amendment) Act of 2019 were ready with the central government and would be notified "much before" the announcement of the Lok Sabha elections in 2024.

Now the question is will it be implemented in Sikkim?? If yes will Art 371f be safeguarded or will be diluted???

Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju tweets that he has met with Chief Minister PS Tamang. He writes: Union of India is also ...
05/02/2023

Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju tweets that he has met with Chief Minister PS Tamang. He writes: Union of India is also filing a Review Petition in Supreme Court to support Sikkim Govt through Solicitor General of India. Govt of India stands with the people of Sikkim.

I assure all the people of Sikkim that this judgment does not deal with or dilute Article 371F of the Constitution and has nothing to do with anyone's citizenship. We value the Constitutional status of every genuine Indian and will be protected at any cost.

Message from the official page of Hon'ble Chief Minister.I met the Hon’ble Union Minister of Law, Government of India Sh...
05/02/2023

Message from the official page of Hon'ble Chief Minister.

I met the Hon’ble Union Minister of Law, Government of India Shri Kiren Rijiju today and submitted a memorandum to apprise and discuss in detail the observations of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.

During the discussion, the Hon’ble Law Minister patiently heard the issues regarding observation of the Hon’ble Apex Court which had given impression that the Sikkimese of Nepali origin are the persons of foreign origin settled in Sikkim.

I highlighted, and emphasized the provision of India Constitution under Article 371F wherein the full protection and rights of Sikkimese people are safeguarded.

Hon’ble Law Minister was apprised that Government of Sikkim has filed review petitions before the Hon’ble Apex Court to suitably address the matters in the larger interest of all the Sikkimese people.

The Hon’ble Law Minister assured that the Government of India is also filing a review petition, and will extend full support to the Government of Sikkim in this regard. He further confirmed that the Solicitor General of India will appear before the Hon’ble Apex Court and Government of India is seriously taking this matter for an early resolution in the interest of all the Sikkimese.

Hon’ble Minister of Tourism & Civil Aviation and Commerce & Industries, Government of Sikkim Shri Bedu Singh Panth was also present during the meeting.

प्रेस विज्ञप्तिमितिः 05/02/20235 जनवरी 2013-को दिन सुप्रीम कोर्टमा दर्ता गरिएको मुद्दाको फैसला सुनाउँदा 13 जनवरी 2023-को...
05/02/2023

प्रेस विज्ञप्ति

मितिः 05/02/2023

5 जनवरी 2013-को दिन सुप्रीम कोर्टमा दर्ता गरिएको मुद्दाको फैसला सुनाउँदा 13 जनवरी 2023-को दिन देशको सर्वोच्च अदालतले दिएको पर्यवेक्षण खण्डमा सिक्किमे नेपालीहरुलाई विदेशी मूलको भनिएकोमा सिक्किम क्रान्तिकारी मोर्चाले अघिबाटै आपति जनाउँदै ग्रम्भीर भएर काम गरिरहेको पुन: जनाउनु चाहन्छुl यही संदर्भमा सिक्किमे नागरिक समाजले गठन गरेको संयुक्त कार्य समिति (Joint Action Committee)-ले आगमी 8 फरवरीको दिन आह्वान गरेको सिक्किम बन्दलाई सिक्किम क्रान्तिकारी मोर्चा पार्टी पूर्णरूपले समर्थन जनाउँदछ। सिक्किमे जनताको हक, हित, अधिकार, अस्तित्व अनि पहिचान सुरक्षित र अक्षुण्ण राख्नुको निम्ति एसकेएम पार्टीले कुनै राजनैतिक अहम नराखी समस्त सिक्किमे जनतासँग काँधमा काँध मिलाएर काम गर्नेछ।
सिक्किमे नेपालीहरुलाई युगौंदेखि लागेको विदेशी वा अनुप्रवेशकारीको कलंक सधैंको निम्ति मेटाउनुको निम्ति एसकेएम पार्टीले निर्णायक लड़ाई लड़्ने कुरा पार्टी अध्यक्ष एवं मुख्यमन्त्री श्रीमान प्रेमसिंह तामाङले जनाइसक्नु भएको छ।
Joint Action Committee-को तत्वावधानमा आगामी 8 फरवरी 2023-को दिन हुने सिक्किम बन्दलाई पार्टीका सम्पूर्ण कार्यकर्ता अनि आम जनताले पूर्णरुपमा साथ दिने अनि सफल बनाउने संदेश वा आह्वान यही प्रेस विज्ञप्तिबाट आधिकारिक रूपले गर्नु चाहन्छु।
एसकेएम पार्टी यो पनि विश्वास प्रकट गर्दछ कि- यो बन्द शान्तिपूर्ण हुनपर्छ। कुनै पनि राजनैतिक उद्देश्यप्रेरित महत्वाकांक्षीहरुले यो बन्दको साहारा लिएर राज्यमा अशान्ति फैलाउनु खोजे बन्द आयोजक अनि पुलिस प्रशासनले कड़ाभन्दा कड़ा कानुनी कदम उठाउनु पर्ने अपील पनि एसकेएम पार्टी गर्दछ। ज्याक (JAC)-को उच्च स्तरीय प्रतिनिधि टोली आज केन्द्रिय मन्त्री वा केन्द्र सरकारका प्रतिनिधिहरूसँग बात गर्नको निम्ति दिल्ली प्रस्थान गरेको खबर ज्याक अध्यक्ष श्री शान्त प्रधानको भीडियो रिलिजबाट थाहा लागेको छ। उहाँहरूको यो यात्रा अति नै सफल रहोस् भन्ने हामी कामना गर्दछौं। सिक्किम क्रान्तिकारी मोर्चा पार्टीका अध्यक्ष एवं राज्यका मुख्यमन्त्री श्रीमान प्रेमसिंह तामाङ यही विषयमा केन्द्रिय मन्त्रीहरूसँग भेटघाट गर्न आज दिल्ली पुगिसकेका छन्। उहाँको यात्रा अनि केन्द्र सरकारका मन्त्रीहरूसँगको भेटघाट सिक्किमे जनताको निम्ति अति नै लाभकारी होस् भन्ने कामना पनि व्यक्त गर्दछौं।

जेकब खालिङ
प्रवक्ता, एसकेएम एवं
मुख्यमन्त्रीका राजनीतिक सचिव, सिक्किम सरकार।

Government of Sikkim has filed review petition in Supreme Court of India: Prem Singh TamangChief Minister of Sikkim Prem...
02/02/2023

Government of Sikkim has filed review petition in Supreme Court of India: Prem Singh Tamang

Chief Minister of Sikkim Prem Singh Tamang through his Facebook handle writes:

"This is to inform everyone that the Government of Sikkim has filed review petitions before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India for suitably addressing the grievances and sentiments of the people of Sikkim concerning certain observations in the judgment pronounced on 13th January 2023.

The Additional Advocate General of Sikkim and the Law Secretary, Government of Sikkim are handling the matter in New Delhi with legal experts.

I will be going to New Delhi to personally meet the Hon’ble Law Minister, Government of India Shri Kiren Rijiju Ji with top law officials of the country for further action.

I reassure everyone that the matter is being dealt with in all seriousness, and I will do everything possible to protect the rights and dignity of all the Sikkimese people."

सिक्किमका स्वास्थ्य मन्त्रीले दिए राजीनामाDr.M.K. शर्माले सिक्किम सरकारको सूचना प्रविधि विभाग, स्वास्थ्य तथा परिवार कल्य...
02/02/2023

सिक्किमका स्वास्थ्य मन्त्रीले दिए राजीनामा

Dr.M.K. शर्माले सिक्किम सरकारको सूचना प्रविधि विभाग, स्वास्थ्य तथा परिवार कल्याण मन्त्री पदबाट राजीनामा दिएका छन्।

02/02/2023

सदन र संसदमा नबोलेर सडकमा के को नाटक? सर्वोच्च न्यायालयका न्यायाधीशहरूको गल्ती देखाउने ज्ञानी सरकार आफ्नो भूल स्वीकार गरेर सुधार गर्न किन चाहँदैन?

आज प्रश्न सिधा छ। हामी इतिहासको अत्यन्तै संवेदनशील घडीमा छौँ। जनविश्वास पाएर जनप्रतिनिधि बनेकाहरू किन यति धेरै असंवेदनशीलता र गैरजिम्मेवारीपन देखाइरहेका छन्। एकजना सांसद छन्, हिजो कुनचाहिँ गाउँमा भाषण गर्दै मिडिया नेताको पछि मात्रै लाग्यो, हामीले भारतलाई आलु दिन सक्दैनौँ यसैले अब प्रतिभा दिनुपर्छ भन्दै थिए। मुख्यमन्त्री एवम् गृह विभागका मन्त्री एउटा प्रेस विज्ञप्ति दिएर कता पसे थाहा छैनन्। कानुन मन्त्री कहाँ छन्? अनि सत्तारूढ दलनै आज सडकमा जुलुस गर्न निस्किने रे'।

विपक्षी दल र विभिन्न सङ्घ-संस्थाहरूले आफ्नो भूमिका निर्वाह गर्दै राम्रा-राम्रा र तर्कसम्मत सुझाव र सल्लाहहरू राखिरहेका छन् तर सरकारलाई पत्तो छैन। अनि आज जुलुस गर्ने रे'।

न्यायालयमा उक्त मुद्दामा एउटा प्रतिवादी सिक्किम सरकार पनि थियो। सरकार मुद्दा हारेको हो। लु मुद्दा हर्‍यो केही छैन, तर फैसला भित्र सिक्किमेली नेपालीहरू विदेशी मूलका सेटलर्सहरू हुन् भन्ने वाक्य कसरी पस्यो? 'सिक्किमे' शब्दको परिभाषामाथि अहिलेसम्मकै सबैभन्दा ठूलो प्रहार भएको छ। सरकारले केही गर्न सकेन। अहिले जुलुस गर्ने रे'। अझै आफैलाई परिपक्व भन्छ सरकार। न्यायाधीशको गल्ती देखाउँछ सरकार। अचम्म लाग्छ। सरकारमा बसेको चार वर्ष भइसक्यो सरकार र विपक्षीको भूमिका छुट्याउन नसकेको हो कि के हो?

न्यायालयमा मुद्दा दर्ता गराउनुक‍ो पछि मुख्य दिमाग जुन व्यक्तिको थियो सरकारले त्यै व्यक्तिलाई आफ्नो अतिरिक्त महाधिवक्ता बनायो। वर्षौंदेखि सिक्किमेको सुरक्षाको पक्षमा बोल्दै आइरहेका केबी राई, भरत बस्नेत र छितेन टाशी भोटियाहरू रून मात्रै सकेनन्। सकेसम्म कराइरहे। तर सरकारले उनीहरूलाई कहिले ध्यान दिएन। आज आएर आफ्नै जनताको पक्षमा कुरा राख्न नसक्दा सरकार मुद्दा हर्‍यो। न्यायालयमा मुद्दा हारेपछि सडकमा जुलुस गर्ने रे'। यो कस्तो नाटक हो?

अर्का एकजना नेता छन्। वर्तमान मुख्यमन्त्रीका राजनैतिक सल्लाहकार अहिले एउटा गैरराजनैतिक मञ्चबाट कराइरहेका छन्। अचम्म लाग्छ, सरकारले अतिरिक्त महाधिवक्ताको नियुक्त गर्दा उनको सल्लाह लिएन रे'। सरकारले सबै कुरामा सल्लाह लिँदैन भन्दै अति गैरजिम्मेवारीपूर्ण बयान दिने व्यक्ति अहिले नेपालीक‍ो नेता हुन ख‍ोज्दैछन्। प्रश्न त उठ्छ। पद पनि नछाड्ने, आफ्नो पार्टीभित्र दह्रोसँग कुरा पनि नराख्ने, सरकारलाई जिम्मेवारी पनि नठहर्‍याउने अनि फेरि म लड्छु भन्दै बाहिर आएर बोल्ने। आज कुरा सिधा छ, टीएन ढकालले आफ्नो दुईपक्षीय कुरा छोड्नुपर्छ।

सर्वोच्च न्यायालयको भर्खरैको एउटा फैसलामा सिक्किमेली नेपालीलाई 'विदेशी मूलका सेटलर्स' भनेर उल्लेख गरिएको मात्रै कुरा छैन तर 'सिक्किमे' शब्द, त्यसको परिभाषा र त्यसको महत्त्वमाथि नै प्रहार भएको छ। सरकारले भर्खरै एउटा प्रेस विज्ञप्ति दिँदा यो कुरा किन देखेन? आज खाजा र गाडी भाडा निःशुुल्क बनाएर (मैले सुनेको मात्रै) भेला गरिएका कतिजना जनतालाई उक्त फैसला पढेर सत्तारूढ दलले विश्वास दिलाउने हो?

सरकारले रिभ्यु याचिका हाल्ने कुरा चल्दैछ। त्यसअघि सरकारले जनतालाई विश्वास दिलाउनुपर्छ कि उसले कसको माध्यमबाट रिभ्यु याचिका लगाउने छ? उहीँ पुरानै अधिवक्ताहरूको माध्यमबाट? जसले हामीलाई यो अवस्थामा पुर्‍याउन सबैभन्दा ठूलो भूमिका खेले उसलाई के गर्छ सरकारले? अनि सर्वोच्च न्यायालयले भावनात्मक भएर तिमीहरू विदेशी होइनौँ, मैले गलती गरेछु भन्छ? पुरानै दस्तावेज र आधारहरू राख्दा नयाँ फैसला आउँछ? न्यायालय यति मूर्ख हुन्छ? रिभ्यु याचिका दर्ता गरेपछि सरकार ढुक्कसँग बस्छ किनकि यो मुद्दा विचाराधीन हुन्छ। मुद्दा जति वर्षसम्म तन्किए पनि फैसला उस्तै आउँछ। बिचमा अरू बोल्न पाउँदैनन्। यसैले भन्दैछु, घरीघरी लागिरहने कलंकलाई सधैं सधैंका लागि मेटाउने अवसर पाएको छ सरकारले। किन ठोस कदम चाल्दैन सरकार? जनता साथमा छन्। प्रजातन्त्रमा सबैभन्दा शक्तिशाली जनता र जननिर्वाचित सरकार हो। हामी यो देशका नागरिक हौँ वा होइनौँ, त्यो त‍ोक्ने निकाय न्यायालय होइन। न्यायालयले त जस्तो तथ्यांक र दस्तावेज पेस गरिन्छ त्यस्तै विश्लेषण गर्छ। सरकारले विशेष विधानसभा सत्र ब‍ोलाएर 'सिक्किमे नेपालीहरू यहाँका मूलवासी हुन्' भनेर प्रस्ताव पारित गरोस् र न्यायालयमा त्यस्तै बलियो आधारहरू पठाओस्। गृहमन्त्रालयमा पठाओस्। हामी इतिहासकै अत्यन्त संवेदनशील घडीमा छौँ। सत्तारूढ दलको काम नारा जुलुस गर्ने होइन निर्णायक भूमिका निर्वाह गर्ने उत्तरदायित्व हो।

अनि विपक्षका अर्का एकजना विधायक, ठूला र परिपक्व भनिने नेता पवन चामलिङ कहाँ छन्। हिजो अस्ति भारतीय गोर्खाहरूलाई अन्याय भइरहेको छ भन्दै प्रेस बयान दिने नेता अहिले किन मौन छन्?

 Ace grappler Bajrang Punia became the only Indian to claim four medals at the World Wrestling Championships by clinchin...
20/09/2022



Ace grappler Bajrang Punia became the only Indian to claim four medals at the World Wrestling Championships by clinching a bronze in Belgrade.

Bajrang, who won a bronze in last year's Tokyo Olympics, eked out a close 11-9 win on points over Sebastian C Rivera of Puerto Rico in one of the bronze medal bouts in the 65 kg category.

Information source- Kreedon

 President of Sikkim Football Association (SFA) Sh Menla Ethenpa  appointed as Chairman, Finance committee of All India ...
20/09/2022


President of Sikkim Football Association (SFA) Sh Menla Ethenpa appointed as Chairman, Finance committee of All India Football Federation (AIFF).

 . Order for regulation and diversion of traffic movement.
20/09/2022

.

Order for regulation and diversion of traffic movement.

20/09/2022

Address

Gangtok
737102

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The New Horizon Sikkim posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to The New Horizon Sikkim:

Share

Category

Nearby media companies