15/12/2024
The Outbreak of the South Sudan Civil War in December 2013, A Tragic Political Divide
In December 2013, South Sudan, the world’s youngest nation, descended into a brutal civil war that has since shaped its political and social landscape. The conflict was rooted in political divisions between President Salva Kiir and his then-Vice President Dr. Riek Machar, whose disagreements spiraled into a devastating war that claimed thousands of lives and displaced millions.
The immediate trigger of the conflict occurred on the evening of December 12, 2013, when President Salva Kiir ordered General Marial Chinuor to disarm the Presidential Guards, also known as the Tiger Division. This order was carried out, with all soldiers in the unit being disarmed. However, the following day, General Marial Chinuor reversed the directive, rearming soldiers from the Dinka ethnic group while leaving their Nuer counterparts unarmed.
This move sent alarming signals to the Nuer soldiers within the unit, who interpreted the selective rearmament as a potential threat against them. In response, the Nuer soldiers forced their way into the armory to rearm themselves, not to attack their colleagues but to ensure their safety amidst rising tensions.
The situation escalated rapidly. What began as a split within the Tiger Division erupted into open gunfire at the Giada military headquarters in Juba, sparking a larger conflict. The violence quickly spread beyond the military to civilians, with Dinka soldiers and militias reportedly targeting Nuer civilians, including women, children, and the elderly.
President Salva Kiir’s handling of the situation exacerbated the conflict. Instead of calling for calm, he invoked historical grievances, referencing the 1991 split between Dr. John Garang and Dr. Riek Machar, further inflaming ethnic tensions. This rhetoric fueled retaliatory violence and deepened the divide between South Sudan’s ethnic communities, particularly the Dinka and Nuer.
The conflict soon engulfed the nation, with atrocities committed on both sides, including massacres, sexual violence, and the destruction of communities. Despite international efforts to broker peace, the violence continued for years.
In 2018, the Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in South Sudan (R-ARCSS) was signed, raising hopes for a lasting peace. However, implementation has been slow and fraught with challenges, including political instability and a lack of commitment from the parties involved. To date, no one has been held accountable for the atrocities committed during the war, leaving a deep scar on the nation’s collective conscience.
The December 2013 conflict stands as a tragic reminder of the devastating consequences of political and ethnic divisions. While the R-ARCSS remains a beacon of hope, its success hinges on genuine political will and the pursuit of justice for those who suffered during the war. Without accountability and reconciliation, the wounds of 2013 will continue to haunt South Sudan’s journey toward peace and stability.
Repost
