01/09/2023
The next AQ isn't out for another month, by which time there will only be a couple of weeks before the referendum. AQ takes pride in its support for the 'YES' and as such we're publishing October's editorial here, now.
From the upcoming edition of AQ:
As I sit down to write this in early September, the Voice to Parliament referendum campaign has only just begun – and I hope that everyone will unashamedly be voting ‘YES’.
Between now and the 14th October I doubt the ‘No’ campaign will abandon its cynical, destructive, and opportunistic tactics, much of which has relied on wilful misrepresentation of the facts. I only hope that the majority of Australians see through these enough to make an informed, conscious decision.
This is not to decry ‘No’ voters as racist or backward – Australia’s democracy is one of the strongest in the world and exercising our vote should be a badge of pride for everyone. My criticism is levelled at Australia’s media concentration laws that have created media titans that uncritically (and gleefully) align with the modern conservative predisposition to smash things with no plan or will to rebuild.
Fundamentally, the Voice is not a radical proposal – other countries around the world have instituted far stronger Indigenous representation mechanisms that would give the Liberal party and Sky News night terrors. And their democracies and societies are stronger for it.
Previously I’ve lived in New Zealand. They are decades ahead of Australia in their respect, inclusion, and pride in Māori culture, both in their social and political spheres.
Our parliament is full of lobby groups, party-backed think tanks, and self-interested stakeholders – many of whom buy their way into the ears of our politicians. Why then is it radical that Indigenous groups – historically excluded from the political process and without wealthy backers – should not have the same opportunity to advocate for their interests as cashed up property developers do?
Where is the outrage when legislators consult with industry and unions, but not with First Nations?
The power of the Voice will not be in its existence in the constitution – it will be in the shared value it creates for all Australians by promoting equity, discussion, and understanding, as well as a shared pride in what Australia uniquely represents.
The Voice is not a monolith carved into the Constitution; what the Voice IS remains to be legislated and will be shaped by ongoing debate between ALL Australians. This referendum is simply a commitment to that process, acknowledging that Indigenous citizens having more of a say in the decisions that affect them, means that we all stand to benefit from a more cohesive, fair, and forward-thinking country.
- The Editor