Project 2025 Is Here—And Trump's Not Hiding It Anymore.
During his campaign, Trump swore he had nothing to do with Project 2025, the radical right-wing blueprint to reshape America. Now, as President-elect, he's embraced its architects and their agenda with open arms. What does this mean for the future of democracy? Dive into our latest investigative piece to uncover the full story: Read More
💔🇺🇸 The Demise of Justice and Democracy in America 🇺🇸💔
Today marks a somber chapter in our nation's history. Special Counsel Jack Smith has moved to dismiss the federal cases against President-elect Donald Trump, including those concerning election interference and the mishandling of classified documents.
AP NEWS
This decision underscores a troubling reality: the immense influence of money and special interests has overshadowed the pillars of justice and democracy. As Trump prepares to re-enter the White House, these developments paint a bleak picture of America's future.
We must confront this moment with unwavering resolve. The integrity of our democratic institutions is at stake. Let us unite in the pursuit of accountability and the preservation of the values that define our nation.
On November 25, 2024, Special Counsel Jack Smith moved to dismiss two significant federal cases against President-elect Donald Trump:
Election Interference Case: This case accused Trump of attempting to overturn the 2020 election results. Smith's decision to dismiss aligns with the Department of Justice's longstanding policy that prohibits the prosecution of a sitting president.
AP NEWS
Classified Documents Case: This case involved allegations of Trump unlawfully retaining classified documents after leaving office. The dismissal follows a July 2024 ruling by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, who found that Smith's appointment violated the Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
PEOPLE
These decisions effectively conclude federal efforts to hold Trump accountable for these charges as he prepares to assume the presidency again.
Sources:
Associated Press:
AP NEWS
The Wall Street Journal:
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
ABC News:
ABC NEWS
The New York Times:
PEOPLE
#JusticeOverturned #DemocracyAtRisk #StandForTruth 🌟 Stay in the Loop with a Twist!
Crave more than just the run-of-the-mill news? Dive into the audacious and razor-sharp commentary at Pigsf
💔🇺🇸 The Demise of Justice and Democracy in America 🇺🇸💔
Today marks a somber chapter in our nation's history. Special Counsel Jack Smith has moved to dismiss the federal cases against President-elect Donald Trump, including those concerning election interference and the mishandling of classified documents.
AP NEWS
This decision underscores a troubling reality: the immense influence of money and special interests has overshadowed the pillars of justice and democracy. As Trump prepares to re-enter the White House, these developments paint a bleak picture of America's future.
We must confront this moment with unwavering resolve. The integrity of our democratic institutions is at stake. Let us unite in the pursuit of accountability and the preservation of the values that define our nation.
On November 25, 2024, Special Counsel Jack Smith moved to dismiss two significant federal cases against President-elect Donald Trump:
Election Interference Case: This case accused Trump of attempting to overturn the 2020 election results. Smith's decision to dismiss aligns with the Department of Justice's longstanding policy that prohibits the prosecution of a sitting president.
AP NEWS
Classified Documents Case: This case involved allegations of Trump unlawfully retaining classified documents after leaving office. The dismissal follows a July 2024 ruling by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, who found that Smith's appointment violated the Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
PEOPLE
These decisions effectively conclude federal efforts to hold Trump accountable for these charges as he prepares to assume the presidency again.
Sources:
Associated Press:
AP NEWS
The Wall Street Journal:
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
ABC News:
ABC NEWS
The New York Times:
PEOPLE
#JusticeOverturned #DemocracyAtRisk #StandForTruth 🌟 Stay in the Loop with a Twist!
Crave more than just the run-of-the-mill news? Dive into the audacious and razor-sharp commentary at Pigsf
🎪 Trump’s Sentencing Delayed—The Circus and Its Enablers Roll On🎪
Step right up! Justice took another nosedive as a Trump-appointed judge hit pause on sentencing the Ringmaster-in-Chief for his *34 felony convictions.*
Yes, Donald J. Trump, guilty of falsifying business records to cover up a sex scandal, won’t face justice next week—or anytime soon. Prosecutors now suggest delaying sentencing until after Trump’s presidency, essentially handing him a "Get Out of Accountability Free" card.
Why? Oh, he’s *busy*. “Running the country” apparently exempts him from paying for crimes that would land anyone else behind bars. His lawyers, flush with donor cash, invoke a 1963 law on smooth presidential transitions—because hush-money scandals apparently qualify.
Let’s pause to appreciate Glen Kirschner’s pointed outrage here.
How can a system built on "equal justice under law" function when prosecutors, judges, and yes, Supreme Court justices twist themselves into pretzels to accommodate a man *convicted of felonies*? This isn’t about constitutional balance; it’s about power, privilege, and a glaring lack of courage to enforce accountability.
Justice Merchan, while undecided, entertains arguments to freeze the case for four years, leaving the jury’s guilty verdict in limbo. Prosecutors are left to plead for basic respect for the jury’s role. Meanwhile, Trump’s legal circus spins this as a “decisive win” while his other criminal cases gather dust.
This is no longer just a broken system—it’s a system complicit in its own demise. The Supreme Court’s prior rulings favoring Trump only embolden this farce, turning the judicial branch into his personal shield. If no one enforces the law, what’s left? Accountability is out the window; the clowns run the show, and Trump remains the ringmaster.
Enjoy the popcorn, America. The circus is here to stay. 🎟️
🌟 Stay in the Loop with a Twist!
Crave more than just th
📰 PIGSFLY NEWS EXCLUSIVE | TRUMP'S DEFENSE PICK: APOCALYPSE NOW OR NEVER?"
💥 FOX NEWS HOST TURNED DOOMSDAY ARCHITECT? 💥
Step aside, Nostradamus—the real prophets of doom are here, and one of them might just end up running the Pentagon. Michael Popok of *The Intersection* dives deep into the unsettling worldview of Pete Hegseth, Trump’s nominee for Secretary of Defense, whose ideology appears to be less about safeguarding democracy and more about ushering in a divine reboot of Earth, apocalypse-style.
🔥 ALT-RIGHT CHRISTIAN NATIONALIST? OH, ABSOLUTELY.**
Hegseth isn’t just your standard-issue Fox News firebrand or Trump loyalist. No, Pete’s aspirations go much deeper—and darker. A fervent supporter of alt-right Christian nationalist ideologies, Hegseth reportedly subscribes to a belief system that sees global catastrophe (read: World War III) as a *necessary step* to fulfill biblical prophecy. Forget diplomacy; it’s fire and brimstone all the way down.
According to Popok, Hegseth’s theological fervor is more than a personal quirk—it’s a potential threat to national and global security. His “divinely inspired” vision isn’t just about personal salvation; it’s about remaking the world order through chaos.
🚨 TOO EXTREME FOR THE NATIONAL GUARD
Popok reminds us that Hegseth was deemed **too much of a security risk** to serve at Biden’s inauguration, with his tattoos and rhetoric raising alarms among military officials. The man whose bicep screams “Deus Vult” (a phrase embraced by white nationalist groups) wasn’t exactly who you wanted standing guard after the Jan. 6 insurrection.
But this isn’t just about ink. The concerns stem from Hegseth’s apparent disdain for democratic institutions and his enthusiastic embrace of far-right extremism. Military officials feared he could be an insider threat—and now Trump wants to hand him the nuclear codes.
🌍 WWIII AS A RELIGIOUS GOAL?
The most chilling takeawa
📣 “Voters, you’re about to get what you voted for. Buckle up🗳️👀
🔴 Trump’s latest plan? Demand total obedience from the GOP, use a “phony” Senate recess, and stack the Cabinet and courts with unvetted picks.
Imagine Senate seats filled without so much as a public hearing or a single confirmation question.
Enter John Thune, the senator from South Dakota rumored to be Trump’s preferred choice for Senate Majority Leader, and with him a possible path for the President-elect to circumvent Senate oversight entirely.
So, will Thune and his so-called “institutionalist” allies stand up against a takeover of the Constitution’s checks and balances? Or will they enable Trump’s handpicked loyalists to occupy every powerful office in sight? 👔
📺 VIDEO: *Did Trump Just Rig the Vote?* Popok is @ The Intersection, here to break it down.
Here’s what the media is starting to catch on to:
"What are recess appointments, and how could Trump use them?"** – *Associated Press*
“Trump is eyeing a procedural loophole to seat his Cabinet picks without Senate approval.”
"House Results: Republicans Win Majority"** – *The Times*
*“With GOP control over both chambers, Trump’s control over Washington just expanded.”
"Trump Takes Aim at Republicans"** – *The Atlantic*
*“Trump wants to sidestep even his party’s leadership. Bypassing scrutiny could change everything.”
"GOP alarm at Gaetz nomination"** – *The Australian*
*“Rumors swirl that Trump’s AG pick, Gaetz, could be slipped in through a recess backdoor.”
The stakes? A “loyalty-first” government where the Senate’s role to advise and consent becomes just another formality. Stay tuned.
🌟 Stay in the Loop with a Twist!
Crave more than just the run-of-the-mill news? Dive into the audacious and razor-sharp commentary at Pigsfly Newspaper! Click your way to spectacle and insight
🌟 Make sure to hit the like button and follow us on Facebook Pigsflyne
🗣 Pigsfly News: The Drama of American Democracy – Brought to You by Big Oil, Elon Musk, and Trump’s Vengeance Tour
🌐 Buckle up, folks. If you thought Donald Trump’s first term was a show, his second is gearing up to be a full-blown blockbuster. It’s like someone handed the government to Big Oil, Elon Musk, and their privileged NEPO babies with instructions to make “democracy” a personalized toy. Oh, and in this “new” era, the DOJ might just be the first department fed through the wood chipper, rebranded to serve “Donald’s personal justice.” 🪵🪓
🚨 And here’s the kicker: Trump has tapped Susie Wiles as his White House chief of staff. According to Ari Melber and an insightful discussion featuring Jelani Cobb and Molly Jong-Fast, this "historic election win" sets the stage for a more refined—err, let’s call it targeted—approach to justice. Career lawyers at the DOJ are either bracing for impact or eyeing the exits as they contemplate working under a president who blames the DOJ for his “torments.”
🧩 Here’s a sneak peek at the upcoming reality show*—DOJ vs. Trump 2.0. Will he go full “revenge mode” on special counsel Jack Smith? Replace civil rights staff with ultra-loyal cronies? Run off deep-state dissidents and, maybe, just maybe, bring in a new AG who would fit better in a Western movie than the Justice Department? GOP favorites like Mike Lee, Kash Patel, and *Ken Paxton* are practically in the green room, ready for their big break. 🎬
💣 DOJ staff, from the Civil Rights Division to National Security, brace for Trump’s “creative” remakes, especially those who have even a distant association with *Mueller* or *Smith*. The widespread fear? Getting sidelined, frozen out, or finding themselves in the crosshairs of the new administration’s personal vendettas. Meanwhile, those who can stomach it urge career officials to hang on, pointing out the vital role these folks play as the “last guardrails
🚀💰 Trump + Musk = Billion-Dollar Bromance: Power, Cash, & Control! 💰🚀
Imagine Neil Diamond’s *You Don’t Bring Me Flowers* remixed into ABBA’s *Money, Money, Money*—the anthem for Musk’s alliance with Trump. With a $100 million campaign investment, Elon Musk has not only gone all-in for Trump but seems ready to buy influence at the top levels of government. According to sources, Musk has even suggested Trump fill his administration with key SpaceX employees, including top spots at the Department of Defense, one of SpaceX’s biggest customers.
Musk’s companies (SpaceX, Tesla, etc.) are already dependent on government contracts and benefits—from billions in defense dollars to carbon credits and tax breaks. But having a “friend” in the White House? Priceless. A Trump win could give Musk the influence he’s wanted, not just in federal contracts, but possibly even in agency oversight—hinting at a conflict of interest that’s hard to ignore.
📉 “Annoying Oversight? Not for Elon”📉
Experts warn Trump’s DOJ may dodge investigations into Musk’s companies, letting Tesla and SpaceX skip over the usual scrutiny. Economist Hal Singer predicts Trump’s administration will investigate enemies, not friends, in what would be a clear favoritism play.
🌌 Mars or Bust: Musk’s Galactic Ambitions🌌
Musk is fixated on Mars and has Trump’s ear. While NASA pours billions into moon missions, Musk dreams of redirecting funds toward his Martian vision. With the right allies in place, NASA’s budget might just shift to fit his dreams.
💥 In the End: Billionaire Buddies Rewrite the Rules 💥
In this Trump-Musk love story, power isn’t romantic—it’s transactional. Musk’s $100 million investment may buy him influence, regulatory freedom, and a slice of the federal pie. Forget *flowers*; for Musk, it’s all *Money, Money, Money*.
🚀💰 Mega MAGA Meets Mega Bucks: Musk & Trump’s Billion-Dollar Bromance Takes Washington! 💰🚀
Imagine if Neil Diamond’s *You Don’t Bring Me Flowers* had a remix—this time with Mr. Musk singing a soulful serenade to a Trump presidency. Yet in *this* duet, it’s not flowers Musk wants. In fact, it's more like ABBA’s classic tune *Money, Money, Money*. The Musk-Trump dynamic hums with that theme: greenbacks, influence, and a whole lot of insider power.
Elon Musk, ever the visionary (and opportunist), has invested a whopping $100 million in Donald Trump’s campaign, ensuring his pro-MAGA propaganda graces every corner of the internet via his social media platform, X. But it doesn’t stop there. Musk’s private discussions with Trump weren’t just for show—they had real goals. Picture this: he’s handpicked some of his SpaceX lieutenants to slot into high-ranking government positions, especially within the Defense Department. Yes, the same Defense Department that forks over billions to SpaceX contracts.
So, is this a love song? Hardly. The Musk-Trump alliance appears less like a ballad and more like a cash-fueled transaction. Musk has made it clear: if Trump wins, he’ll have an “open-door policy” with the White House. From potentially steering federal policies in his companies’ favor to revisiting federal contracts, Musk’s moves could strategically remove any meaningful oversight on his businesses, including Tesla’s $1.79 billion in carbon credits and the $7,500 tax credit Tesla gets for electric cars, perks that help line the company’s bottom line.
🛑 Conflict of Interest?” The Room Cries Out! 🛑
Musk's companies—Tesla, SpaceX, Neuralink, and others—depend heavily on federal contracts and taxpayer dollars. Let’s just say, having a “friend in the White House” has perks. Not only could Musk steer federal agendas to benefit SpaceX’s Mars obsession (forget the Moon!), but he’s got his eyes on key regulatory
In this video, legal analyst **Glenn Kirschner** expressed deep concerns over Trump’s stated intention to wield “dictatorial” powers from his first day in office. Addressing viewer questions about the repercussions of Trump’s plans, Kirschner invoked the hope that “it’s always darkest before the dawn,” suggesting that the heightened challenges facing American democracy could still give way to renewal.
Kirschner’s commentary follows Trump’s sweeping victory, a win that reaffirms his hold on American politics and his commitment to a radical reshaping of governmental norms. With his promise to consolidate authority and remove institutional checks, Trump’s vision signals unprecedented changes that could strain the very foundations of democratic governance. His rhetoric, coupled with policy proposals that hinge on executive power and loyalty from federal agencies, has alarmed both political analysts and civil rights advocates.
🔺 Domestic and Institutional Shifts 🔺
Trump’s plans for a “dictatorial” approach may see the removal of officials deemed oppositional, raising the specter of unchecked power within the executive branch. This reorganization could drastically reduce oversight and reshape the federal landscape into one more amenable to Trump's policy objectives. Such moves challenge the norms of accountability and are set to test the resilience of U.S. democratic institutions, potentially resulting in diminished independence within branches traditionally insulated from executive influence.
🌐 Foreign Relations and Security Concerns🌐
Trump’s return could also upend U.S. foreign policy. In his initial talks with Israeli Prime Minister **Benjamin Netanyahu**, Trump emphasized a cooperative stance on Middle Eastern security, focusing specifically on countering Iran. His pledge to prioritize “peace through strength” in Ukraine, greeted with mixed responses from global leaders, could signal a shift toward a more unilateral
🗳️ Early Voting Surge in 2024 Election: Key Takeaways 🗳️
The surge in early voting this election season is all about the issues voters are rallying behind. With health care, abortion rights, criminal justice reform, and the economy as the driving forces, voters are sending a clear message that they’re not waiting for Election Day to weigh in.
From the Harris campaign’s call to “bank those votes” early to Trump’s pivot from past criticism of early voting to an all-out push for early ballots, both sides are treating early voting as a high-stakes battlefield. Here’s where we stand:
🔍 What We’re Seeing So Far:
1. Democratic Edge: Democratic voters are leading the early voting charge, spurred by Harris’ campaign to capitalize on this “banked vote” advantage. This could be a strategic boon, especially if traditional Election Day hurdles emerge.
2. Republican Shift: Republicans are still largely inclined toward in-person voting, but this year, the GOP is also tapping into early voting enthusiasm. The idea? Lock down support sooner and expand voter turnout options.
3. Record-Breaking Numbers: Early data hints at potentially historic turnout, setting up a climactic finish to a tight race. This level of participation, driven by decisive issues, hints that voters from both sides are ready to speak loudly on policies impacting their daily lives.
With early ballots pouring in, we’re getting a real-time look at voter priorities in a race that’s shaping up to be as contentious and pivotal as ever. Stay tuned—Election Day may be the final act, but the story is already unfolding.
🌟 Stay in the Loop with a Twist!
Crave more than just the run-of-the-mill news? Dive into the audacious and razor-sharp commentary at Pigsfly Newspaper! Click your way to spectacle and insight
🌟 Make sure to hit the like button and follow us on Facebook Pigsflynewspaper
Ready for news that packs a punch? Visit us at Pigsfly Newspaper and never miss a
🗳️ It's a moment that defies belief: the American electorate has chosen to return a convicted felon, a man found guilty on 34 counts of falsifying business records, to the highest office in the land. This is the same individual who has faced credible allegations of sexual misconduct, who has been documented spreading falsehoods at an unprecedented scale, and who has repeatedly made statements that have been widely condemned as racist.
How did we arrive at this juncture? How does a nation that prides itself on the rule of law and moral leadership reconcile the election of someone who has so flagrantly flouted both? The implications for our democracy are profound. What message does this send about our collective values and the standards we set for our leaders?
As we grapple with these questions, it's imperative to reflect on the forces that have led us here. The disillusionment, the divisions, the disinformation—all have played a role in shaping this outcome. But acknowledging these factors does not absolve us of responsibility. The choice has been made, and now we must confront the reality of the horror and what it means for the future of our nation.
Early Voting Surge in 2024 Election: Key Takeaways 🗳️
The surge in early voting this election season is all about the issues voters are rallying behind. With health care, abortion rights, criminal justice reform, and the economy as the driving forces, voters are sending a clear message that they’re not waiting for Election Day to weigh in.
From the Harris campaign’s call to “bank those votes” early to Trump’s pivot from past criticism of early voting to an all-out push for early ballots, both sides are treating early voting as a high-stakes battlefield. Here’s where we stand:
🔍 What We’re Seeing So Far:
1. Democratic Edge: Democratic voters are leading the early voting charge, spurred by Harris’ campaign to capitalize on this “banked vote” advantage. This could be a strategi